Appeals are a critical opportunity to challenge convictions and sentences through a formal legal process. When trial errors occur, procedural violations happen, or constitutional rights are compromised, an appellate attorney can review your case and present arguments to higher courts. At Greene and Lloyd, we understand the complexities of appellate procedure and work diligently to identify viable grounds for appeal that trial counsel may have overlooked or inadequately developed.
Appeals provide a mechanism to address significant trial errors that may have affected your conviction or sentence. Appellate review can result in conviction reversal, new trials, sentence reduction, or case dismissal. Many convictions contain reversible errors—improper jury instructions, admission of illegally obtained evidence, ineffective counsel representation, or prosecutorial misconduct. By appealing, you preserve your rights and give the appellate court an opportunity to correct injustices that occurred at trial. The appellate process differs fundamentally from trial proceedings, requiring knowledge of appellate rules, standards of review, and persuasive legal writing.
Criminal appeals begin after sentencing and must typically be filed within specific timeframes established by Washington law. The notice of appeal triggers the appellate process, requiring the trial court to prepare the trial record for appellate review. Your appellate attorney will examine the entire record—transcripts, evidence, motions, and trial proceedings—to identify legal errors that affected your rights. Appellate arguments focus on questions of law rather than guilt or innocence, challenging whether proper legal procedures were followed and whether constitutional protections were upheld.
A direct appeal is filed after sentencing and challenges errors that occurred during trial. It reviews the trial record without presenting new evidence, focusing on whether trial procedures complied with constitutional and statutory requirements.
A habeas corpus petition challenges the legality of detention or conviction based on constitutional violations or ineffective assistance of counsel not properly addressed on direct appeal.
This claim asserts that your trial attorney’s performance fell below adequate standards, resulting in prejudicial errors that affected your trial outcome or sentencing.
A written document submitted to the appellate court presenting legal arguments, case law analysis, and explanations of why trial errors warrant reversal or modification of conviction or sentence.
During trial, your attorney must properly object to preserve issues for appeal. Appellate courts may not consider arguments that were not raised at trial. Make sure your trial counsel raises all potential legal defenses and objections when evidence is admitted or jury instructions are given.
Strict deadlines govern the appellate process—missing them can result in waiver of your appeal rights. After sentencing, contact an appellate attorney immediately to ensure your notice of appeal is filed within the required timeframe.
If direct appeal is unsuccessful, habeas corpus petitions and other post-conviction remedies may remain available. Ineffective assistance of counsel claims and newly discovered evidence can provide grounds for additional relief.
When trial included improper jury instructions, admission of illegally obtained evidence, or prosecutorial misconduct, comprehensive appellate representation becomes essential. These errors often meet the standards for appellate reversal if properly presented. A thorough appeal increases your chances of securing meaningful relief.
If your trial attorney failed to investigate, present viable defenses, or adequately cross-examine witnesses, ineffective assistance claims warrant comprehensive post-conviction representation. These claims require detailed performance analysis and prejudice evaluation. Full appellate review can expose deficiencies in trial counsel’s representation.
If your trial proceeded with proper procedures and limited legal violations, a focused appeal addressing specific preserved issues may be sufficient. A streamlined appeal can efficiently present your strongest arguments to the court.
Appeals focused solely on sentence excessiveness or illegal sentencing practices may not require extensive trial record review. Targeted legal arguments addressing sentencing law and proportionality can be effective without comprehensive appellate litigation.
Improper jury instructions or wrongfully admitted evidence can prejudice trial outcomes. Appeals challenging these issues often succeed when documented in the trial record.
Sentences that appear excessive compared to similar cases or violate sentencing guidelines warrant appellate review. Sentence modification appeals can reduce your time incarcerated.
When prosecutors withhold evidence or engage in misconduct, constitutional violations justify appellate reversal. These issues often provide strong grounds for conviction reversal or new trial.
Greene and Lloyd understands the appellate landscape in Washington and the specific challenges you face pursuing post-conviction relief. Our attorneys have handled direct appeals, habeas corpus petitions, and collateral relief proceedings in state and federal courts. We provide meticulous case review, identifying errors and developing persuasive appellate arguments that give your case the best possible chance for success. Our team combines thorough legal research with compelling brief writing to advocate for your rights before appellate courts.
We work closely with clients throughout the appellate process, explaining complex procedural rules and maintaining communication about case progress. Our attorneys understand that appeals offer critical opportunities to correct trial injustices and overturn wrongful convictions. We approach each appeal with dedication and attention to detail, preparing comprehensive briefs that address all viable legal arguments.
In Washington, a notice of appeal must typically be filed within thirty days of sentencing. This deadline is strict, and missing it can result in permanent loss of appellate rights. Certain circumstances may extend this deadline slightly, but immediate action is essential after sentencing to preserve your appeal rights. If you believe you have grounds for appeal, contact an appellate attorney immediately. We can review your case and ensure that all necessary filings are completed within the required timeframes. Delayed action can jeopardize your opportunity for post-conviction relief.
Yes, you can appeal your conviction even if you entered a guilty plea. However, appeals of guilty pleas face different standards than trial convictions. You can challenge whether your plea was voluntary and knowing, whether your attorney adequately advised you, or whether the court properly explained the consequences of your plea. Additionally, you may raise issues that do not challenge the validity of your plea itself, such as illegal sentences or post-plea trial errors. An appellate attorney can evaluate whether your guilty plea circumstances warrant appeal.
Appealable errors include improper jury instructions, wrongful evidence admission, prosecutorial misconduct, constitutional violations, trial procedure violations, and sentencing errors. Errors must be preserved on the record through timely objections at trial. Some errors are deemed fundamental and can be raised even without preservation. Common appeal grounds include ineffective assistance of counsel, discovery violations, insufficient evidence of guilt, and excessive sentences. Your appellate attorney will thoroughly review your trial record to identify all viable legal arguments for appeal.
The appellate process typically takes one to three years, though timeline varies by court workload and case complexity. Direct appeals to the court of appeals generally take twelve to twenty-four months. The appellate court schedules briefing, may schedule oral argument, and then issues a written decision. Post-conviction petitions may take longer, particularly habeas corpus proceedings. While appeals proceed, you may remain incarcerated or subject to sentence conditions. An appellate attorney can explain expected timelines for your specific case.
An ineffective assistance of counsel claim asserts that your trial attorney’s performance was deficient and prejudiced your case outcome. This applies when counsel failed to investigate, missed viable defenses, provided inadequate cross-examination, or otherwise performed below adequate standards. You must show both deficient performance and resulting prejudice. Ineffective assistance claims typically arise in post-conviction petitions or habeas corpus proceedings, as they often require evidence beyond the trial record. Successfully establishing ineffective assistance can result in conviction reversal and a new trial with different counsel.
Yes, you can appeal your sentence without appealing your conviction. Sentence appeals focus on whether the sentence is illegal, excessive, or improperly imposed. If your conviction is legally sound but your sentence appears disproportionate or violates sentencing guidelines, sentence modification appeal may be viable. Sentence-only appeals can be effective if sentencing errors are documented. Your appellate attorney can evaluate whether your sentence warrants appeal on these limited grounds.
A habeas corpus petition challenges the legality of your detention, typically on constitutional grounds not addressed or inadequately addressed on direct appeal. Habeas petitions often raise ineffective assistance of counsel claims, newly discovered evidence, or fundamental constitutional violations. Habeas corpus is a collateral remedy available after direct appeal concludes. Federal habeas corpus may be available if state remedies are exhausted. Your appellate attorney can determine whether habeas corpus proceedings are appropriate for your post-conviction relief.
After oral argument, the appellate court takes the case under submission for decision. The court of appeals panel meets to discuss the case and decide whether to affirm, reverse, or modify the trial court judgment. One justice typically drafts the court’s written decision. The appellate court issues its written opinion within weeks or months of oral argument. This opinion explains the court’s reasoning and whether your appeal succeeds. If you are unsuccessful, further appeal to the Washington Supreme Court may be possible in limited circumstances.
Yes, if your direct appeal is unsuccessful, additional post-conviction remedies may remain available. Habeas corpus petitions can raise ineffective assistance claims and other issues not adequately addressed on direct appeal. Federal habeas corpus may be available after state remedies are exhausted. Some cases warrant petitions to the Washington Supreme Court or, in extraordinary circumstances, the United States Supreme Court. An appellate attorney can evaluate what further relief may be possible after direct appeal concludes.
Criminal appeal costs vary based on case complexity, record length, and briefing requirements. Some appeals involve straightforward legal issues requiring focused briefing, while others demand extensive record review and research. Appellate attorneys typically charge hourly fees, flat fees for specific services, or combination arrangements. We provide fee consultations to discuss costs transparently. Many clients qualify for cost-effective representation arrangements. Contact Greene and Lloyd to discuss your appeal and learn about available fee options.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields