Defective Product Claims
Product Liability Lawyer in Burien, Washington
Understanding Product Liability Claims in Burien
Product liability claims arise when a defective or dangerous product causes injury to consumers. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we represent injured individuals in Burien who have suffered harm due to faulty manufacturing, inadequate warnings, or dangerous design flaws. Our approach involves thoroughly investigating how the product failed and identifying all responsible parties, from manufacturers to retailers. We understand the physical, emotional, and financial toll these injuries inflict on families and work diligently to secure fair compensation for your losses.
Why Product Liability Claims Matter
Product liability law exists to protect consumers and incentivize manufacturers to prioritize safety over profit margins. When companies cut corners or fail to warn consumers about known dangers, serious injuries occur that could have been prevented. By pursuing these claims, we help ensure that manufacturers maintain accountability and invest in proper safety measures. Beyond individual recovery, successful lawsuits send powerful messages to industries that defective products will not be tolerated. This legal action protects future consumers by motivating companies to conduct thorough testing, issue appropriate warnings, and implement safer designs.
Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd's Track Record
Understanding Product Liability Claims
Product liability encompasses three primary legal theories: manufacturing defects, design defects, and failure to warn. Manufacturing defects occur when a product deviates from its intended design during production, creating an unreasonably dangerous condition. Design defects exist when a product’s inherent design is unsafe, even if manufactured correctly, and a safer alternative design was feasible. Failure to warn claims arise when manufacturers neglect to provide adequate warnings about known risks associated with proper product use. Understanding which theory applies to your situation is essential for building a strong case.
Need More Information?
Product Liability Glossary
Manufacturing Defect
A flaw in how a product was made that causes it to deviate from its intended design and creates an unreasonably dangerous condition. Even one unit with a manufacturing defect can harm consumers and form the basis for liability.
Strict Liability
A legal doctrine holding manufacturers responsible for injuries caused by defective products regardless of whether they were negligent. Under strict liability, the focus is on the product’s condition, not the manufacturer’s conduct.
Design Defect
A fundamental flaw in a product’s design that makes it unreasonably dangerous even when manufactured correctly. Proving a design defect typically requires showing that a safer alternative design was feasible.
Failure to Warn
The manufacturer’s failure to provide adequate warnings or instructions about known risks associated with a product’s foreseeable use, resulting in consumer injury.
PRO TIPS
Document Everything Immediately
Preserve the defective product and take detailed photographs of the injury and damage before authorities dispose of evidence. Keep all medical records, receipts, and documentation of when and where you purchased the product. Written accounts of what happened, witness contact information, and photographs of your injuries significantly strengthen your claim.
Seek Immediate Medical Attention
Medical records establish a clear connection between the defective product and your injuries, which is essential for any claim. Delayed treatment can weaken your case and give insurance companies ammunition to dispute your damages. Comprehensive documentation from healthcare providers provides the foundation for calculating fair compensation.
Consult Our Attorneys Before Settling
Initial settlement offers from manufacturers or their insurers are typically far below what injured victims deserve. Insurance adjusters are trained to minimize payouts, and accepting their first offer can permanently waive your right to additional compensation. Our attorneys negotiate from a position of strength, armed with evidence and willingness to pursue litigation.
Comprehensive vs. Limited Approach to Product Liability
When Full Representation Protects Your Rights:
Multiple Potentially Liable Parties
Complex product liability cases often involve manufacturers, component suppliers, distributors, retailers, and sellers—each with their own insurance coverage. Identifying and pursuing all responsible parties requires thorough investigation and understanding of product supply chains. Focusing on just one party may result in missing significant sources of compensation.
Severe or Permanent Injuries
Life-altering injuries demand full representation to ensure damages account for long-term medical care, lost earning capacity, and diminished quality of life. Insurance companies aggressively defend against catastrophic injury claims, requiring the resources of a dedicated legal team. Comprehensive advocacy with medical experts and damages specialists maximizes recovery for your lifetime needs.
When Streamlined Resolution Works:
Clear Liability and Minor Injuries
Some cases involve obvious defects and straightforward injuries with predictable medical costs and recoveries. When liability is clear and damages are relatively modest, a more simplified negotiation approach may resolve matters efficiently. These scenarios are less common in product liability but may apply to minor injury cases.
Early Settlement Opportunities
Occasionally, responsible parties quickly acknowledge their liability and offer fair settlements without extensive litigation. These rare situations may resolve through prompt negotiation without requiring the full legal machinery. However, most manufacturers resist accountability and require persistent advocacy to achieve justice.
Common Product Liability Scenarios
Why Choose Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd
Our firm has dedicated decades to representing injured individuals against corporate manufacturers and their powerful insurance companies. We understand the tactics used to defend product liability claims and have developed successful counter-strategies backed by thorough investigation and compelling evidence. Our attorneys combine legal knowledge with practical understanding of how products are designed, manufactured, and fail. We invest whatever resources necessary to prove liability and maximize compensation for our clients.
Choosing Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd means gaining advocates who view your case as personal, not just another file. We handle every aspect of your claim, from preserving evidence to negotiating settlements to pursuing trial verdicts when necessary. Our commitment to transparency ensures you understand every decision affecting your case. We work on a contingency basis, meaning you pay nothing unless we recover compensation for you.
Contact Our Burien Office Today
People Also Search For
defective product attorney
manufacturing defect claim
design defect lawsuit
product injury compensation
failure to warn claim
product liability settlement
dangerous product lawsuit
consumer protection attorney
Related Services
FAQS
What is the statute of limitations for product liability claims in Washington?
Washington imposes a three-year statute of limitations for product liability claims, meaning you have three years from the date of injury to file a lawsuit. However, some cases involve the discovery rule, which extends the deadline if the injury wasn’t immediately apparent. This is why consulting an attorney quickly is important—delays can result in losing your legal rights entirely. We evaluate your specific situation to ensure we file within applicable deadlines and protect your claim.
How much does it cost to hire an attorney for a product liability case?
Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd handles product liability cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning we charge no upfront fees. You only pay attorney fees if we successfully recover compensation through settlement or trial verdict, typically taking a percentage of the recovery. This arrangement ensures injured individuals aren’t burdened with legal costs while fighting large manufacturers. We also advance case expenses, so you’re not out-of-pocket for investigation, expert testimony, or court filing fees.
What evidence do I need to prove a product was defective?
Proving a defective product requires the damaged product itself, medical records documenting your injuries, evidence of the product’s failure mode, and often testimony from engineers or safety specialists. Photographs of the defect, manufacturing dates, and maintenance records help establish whether the problem resulted from misuse or inherent defect. We work with product testing specialists who can demonstrate how and why the product failed, and we gather comparable product information showing safer alternatives existed. Our investigators thoroughly document the defect before it can be repaired or discarded.
Can I sue the retailer if the manufacturer is responsible?
Yes, retailers can be held liable for selling defective products under strict liability principles, even if they didn’t manufacture the item. Both the retailer and manufacturer can face liability, and pursuing both parties increases your potential recovery. Retailers have insurance coverage and often have deeper financial resources than small manufacturers, making them valuable defendants. Our attorneys identify all potentially liable parties to ensure comprehensive pursuit of damages on your behalf.
What types of damages can I recover in a product liability claim?
Product liability claims can recover economic damages including medical expenses, lost wages, rehabilitation costs, and future medical care. Non-economic damages compensate for pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and permanent disfigurement or disability. In cases involving egregious manufacturer conduct, punitive damages may be available to punish reckless disregard for consumer safety. We carefully calculate all available damages to ensure fair compensation reflecting the full impact of your injury.
How long does a product liability case typically take to resolve?
Simple cases with clear liability may resolve within 6-12 months, while complex matters involving multiple parties or severe injuries can take 2-4 years or longer. The timeline depends on investigation complexity, discovery disputes, expert testimony, and whether manufacturers cooperate or defend vigorously. We prioritize efficient case resolution while ensuring we never rush to settle prematurely. Our goal is achieving maximum compensation within a reasonable timeframe that allows you to move forward with your life.
What is the difference between a design defect and a manufacturing defect?
A design defect exists when a product’s inherent design is unreasonably dangerous, even if manufactured perfectly according to plans. This requires showing that a safer alternative design was feasible and that the manufacturer knew about the risk. Manufacturing defects involve deviations from the intended design that occur during production, making individual units dangerous. Design defect claims are more challenging legally but affect entire product lines, while manufacturing defect cases focus on isolated failures.
Can comparative fault reduce my product liability recovery?
Washington applies pure comparative fault principles, meaning your recovery can be reduced if you share any responsibility for the injury. However, most product liability cases don’t involve significant user negligence—the defect itself is the primary cause. Manufacturers often raise comparative fault defenses to minimize their liability, but strong evidence of the defect typically overcomes these arguments. Our experienced advocates are prepared to counter manufacturer attempts to shift blame to injured consumers.
What makes a product warning inadequate under Washington law?
A product warning is inadequate under Washington law when it fails to communicate the nature and severity of known risks in clear, understandable language. Warnings must be conspicuous, easily noticeable, and explain how to avoid the danger. If manufacturers were aware of risks and failed to warn consumers adequately, they face liability for resulting injuries. Small print warnings, confusing instructions, or warnings that appear only in difficult-to-find locations are typically considered inadequate.
Should I accept the manufacturer's initial settlement offer?
Manufacturer settlement offers are almost always substantially lower than what injured victims deserve, and accepting them prematurely forfeits your right to additional compensation. Insurance companies employ sophisticated tactics to settle cases quickly and cheaply, and their initial offers rarely reflect true case value. We negotiate from a position of strength, backed by thorough investigation and willingness to pursue litigation. Allowing us to fully develop your case before considering settlement typically results in significantly larger recoveries.