If you have been convicted and believe there were legal errors in your trial, an appeal may provide a path to challenge that conviction. The Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd represents clients throughout Midland, Washington who seek to overturn convictions or secure new trials based on trial court mistakes, ineffective assistance of counsel, or newly discovered evidence. Our legal team reviews case records thoroughly to identify viable appellate grounds and advocates for your rights at every stage of the appellate process.
A conviction does not always represent justice. Trial courts make procedural errors, evidence is sometimes suppressed improperly, and attorneys may fail to provide adequate representation. Appeals and post-conviction relief mechanisms exist to correct these injustices. Successful appeals can result in conviction reversal, new trials, or sentence reduction. Even when conviction reversal is unlikely, appellate work may preserve issues for future consideration or create a record for clemency or modification proceedings. Having an experienced appellate advocate working on your case significantly increases the likelihood of achieving a favorable outcome.
A direct appeal challenges the conviction or sentence by arguing that the trial court made legal errors. The appellate court reviews the trial record to determine whether mistakes affected your rights or the outcome. Appellate courts do not retry cases or hear new evidence; instead, they examine whether trial procedures were followed correctly and whether the law was applied properly. Different standards of review apply depending on the nature of the error, ranging from harmless error analysis to constitutional error standards. Understanding which appellate standard applies to your case is critical for crafting persuasive appellate arguments.
The standard of review determines how closely an appellate court will examine a trial court’s decision. Different standards apply to different types of issues: constitutional errors receive strict scrutiny, legal conclusions are reviewed de novo, factual findings receive deference to trial court determinations, and some evidentiary rulings are reviewed for abuse of discretion. Understanding the applicable standard is essential because it affects how strongly you must present your appellate argument.
A claim that your trial attorney’s performance fell below acceptable standards and prejudiced your defense, violating your Sixth Amendment rights. To succeed on this claim, you must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that there is a reasonable probability the outcome would have been different had counsel performed adequately. This is a common basis for post-conviction relief petitions.
An appeal filed immediately after conviction or sentencing that challenges trial court errors reflected in the trial record. Direct appeals must raise issues that were preserved through objections or motions at trial. They focus on questions of law and procedure rather than introducing new evidence. A successful direct appeal may result in conviction reversal or resentencing.
A legal error that occurred at trial but did not affect the outcome or violate fundamental fairness. Even if an error is proven, an appellate court may uphold the conviction if the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Conversely, constitutional errors receive stricter scrutiny and are less likely to be deemed harmless without reviewing the entire trial context.
Appellate success often depends on decisions made during trial. Timely objections and motions preserve issues for appeal, while failure to object may waive appellate review. Work closely with your trial attorney to identify potential legal problems and ensure proper preservation through appropriate trial motions. If you are considering appeal after conviction, consult with an appellate attorney as soon as possible to evaluate what issues remain available.
Appellate proceedings are governed by strict procedural deadlines that, if missed, may result in dismissal of your appeal or loss of claims. In Washington, notices of appeal must typically be filed within 30 days of sentencing, and post-conviction petitions have specific filing windows. Missing a deadline can permanently eliminate your appellate remedies. Early consultation with an appellate attorney ensures all critical dates are met and no opportunities are lost.
Appeals require different skills than trial work, and appellate attorneys understand how to identify viable issues, frame legal arguments persuasively, and navigate appellate court procedures. If you are assigned counsel on appeal, you have the right to request different representation if your trial attorney has conflicts or if you prefer appellate counsel. Securing qualified appellate representation significantly improves your chances of success.
If the trial court made legal errors regarding jury instructions, evidentiary rulings, constitutional violations, or procedural violations, an appeal provides the mechanism to challenge those errors. Appellate courts exist to correct such mistakes and ensure trials comply with legal standards. An experienced appellate attorney can identify errors that trial courts overlooked and construct arguments that persuade appellate judges to reverse convictions or order new trials.
If your trial attorney failed to investigate properly, missed critical deadlines, presented ineffective defenses, or failed to object to improper evidence, you may have viable ineffective assistance of counsel claims. Post-conviction relief petitions address these issues through affidavits, evidentiary hearings, and detailed legal arguments demonstrating how counsel’s deficiency harmed your defense. Appellate attorneys can document these failures and secure relief.
If your conviction is not in serious dispute but your sentence is excessive, focused sentence modification appeals may be more efficient than challenging the entire conviction. Washington courts will review sentences for excessiveness and may reduce them if proper legal standards were not applied. An appellate attorney can present sentencing arguments without litigating conviction-level issues.
In some circumstances, expungement, record vacation, or executive clemency may provide relief without full appellate litigation. These remedies address collateral consequences of conviction rather than the conviction itself. An attorney familiar with both appellate and administrative remedies can assess which approach best serves your long-term interests and circumstances.
Many convictions result from trial attorneys who failed to mount vigorous defenses, investigate thoroughly, or challenge weak evidence. Post-conviction relief petitions can overturn these convictions when inadequate representation is documented and prejudice is demonstrated.
Improper jury instructions, erroneous admission or exclusion of evidence, and procedural violations frequently provide grounds for appeal. Direct appeals address these errors by demonstrating how they affected trial fairness and outcome.
Evidence that was unavailable at trial but subsequently discovered may support post-conviction relief if it is material and credible. Post-conviction petitions allow courts to consider this evidence and determine whether conviction verdicts should be reconsidered.
The Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd combines trial experience with appellate knowledge to provide comprehensive representation at every stage of your case. We have handled numerous appeals and post-conviction matters across Washington, understanding how appellate courts evaluate cases and what arguments persuade judges. Our attorneys approach each appeal strategically, identifying the strongest possible arguments while addressing all preservation issues. We manage deadlines meticulously, prepare thorough written briefs, and present compelling oral arguments when necessary.
We recognize that appeals involve both legal analysis and personal stakes. A conviction affects your freedom, employment, housing, and family relationships. We treat every appellate case with urgency and care, exploring all available remedies and advocating tirelessly for your rights. Our firm maintains strong relationships with appellate courts throughout Washington and stays current on appellate law developments. When you retain the Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, you gain attorneys committed to challenging your conviction or sentence through every available avenue.
In Washington, you must file a notice of appeal within 30 days of sentencing to pursue a direct appeal. This deadline is strict, and missing it generally eliminates your appellate rights unless extraordinary circumstances justify the delay. Post-conviction relief petitions have different timelines, with some remedies available for longer periods. Immediately consulting with an appellate attorney after conviction ensures you meet all critical deadlines and preserve all available options. Your attorney will file necessary documents and notify appellate courts of your intent to challenge your conviction within the required timeframe.
A direct appeal challenges the conviction or sentence based on errors in the trial record, such as incorrect jury instructions, improper evidence admission, or constitutional violations. Direct appeals must raise issues preserved through trial objections and focus on legal questions rather than introducing new evidence. Post-conviction relief addresses issues unavailable on direct appeal, including ineffective assistance of counsel, newly discovered evidence, and other claims requiring factual development. Post-conviction petitions may involve evidentiary hearings where witnesses testify and new evidence is presented. Both remedies can overturn convictions, but they serve different purposes and follow different procedures.
Yes, you can appeal a guilty plea, though the appellate process differs from appeals challenging jury verdicts. When challenging a guilty plea, you must demonstrate that the trial court failed to ensure your plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, or that you received ineffective assistance of counsel in entering the plea. Appellate courts examine whether the trial court properly explained consequences, ensured you understood rights you were waiving, and confirmed your guilt. Successfully overturning a guilty plea conviction requires showing either a defective plea colloquy or inadequate legal representation during plea negotiations.
Ineffective assistance of counsel is a constitutional claim asserting that your trial attorney’s performance fell below professional standards and harmed your defense. To succeed, you must demonstrate both deficient performance and resulting prejudice, showing a reasonable probability that with competent counsel, the outcome would have been different. Deficient performance includes failing to investigate, missing deadlines, presenting weak defenses, or failing to challenge improper evidence. This claim is raised through post-conviction relief petitions and may overturn convictions or allow new trials. Documenting counsel’s failures through affidavits, trial records, and expert opinions strengthens these claims.
Appellate costs vary depending on case complexity, the number of issues raised, and whether oral arguments are necessary. Direct appeals typically involve brief preparation, appellate court filing fees, and attorney time for legal research and argument. Post-conviction relief petitions may require investigation, affidavit preparation, and evidentiary hearings, increasing costs. The Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd provides fee estimates during initial consultations and discusses payment options. We understand financial constraints and work to manage costs efficiently while providing thorough representation. In some cases, court-appointed counsel may be available at no cost to defendants who qualify.
The appellate process begins with filing a notice of appeal and obtaining trial transcripts. Your attorney then conducts legal research, reviews trial records, and identifies appellate issues. A comprehensive appellate brief is prepared and filed with the court, presenting your legal arguments. The prosecution files a responding brief, and you may file a reply brief. Many cases are decided on briefs alone, though oral arguments may be scheduled where attorneys appear before appellate judges to discuss the case. Appellate courts then issue written decisions affirming, reversing, or modifying convictions. The entire process typically takes 12-24 months.
New evidence is generally not presented during direct appeals, which focus on trial record analysis. However, post-conviction relief petitions can introduce new evidence not available at trial, such as newly discovered witness statements, scientific evidence, or DNA testing results. Evidence must be material, credible, and of such a nature that a reasonable jury would likely have returned a different verdict had it been presented. Evidentiary hearings allow witnesses to testify and courts to evaluate new evidence. If new evidence meets legal standards, courts may vacate convictions and order new trials.
Appeal success rates depend on the strength of appellate issues and legal arguments presented. Successful appeals typically involve clear trial errors, ineffective counsel, or newly discovered evidence. Appellate courts reverse convictions in a percentage of cases, though exact rates vary by jurisdiction and issue type. While appellate success is never guaranteed, qualified legal representation significantly improves your chances. Many appeals result in favorable decisions even when full conviction reversal is unlikely, such as sentence modification or new trial orders. Consulting with an experienced appellate attorney allows realistic assessment of your specific case’s appellate potential.
Yes, you can pursue sentence appeals separately from conviction appeals. Appellate courts review sentences for excessiveness, incorrect application of sentencing guidelines, and procedural errors in sentencing proceedings. Sentence modification appeals focus specifically on whether the sentence imposed violated legal standards or exceeded reasonable bounds. Even if your conviction is not seriously disputed, a focused sentence appeal may reduce an excessive sentence. Your attorney can assess whether sentence-only appeals are strategically advantageous or whether conviction appeals should also be pursued. Some cases benefit from multiple appellate strategies addressing both conviction and sentencing issues.
After conviction, immediately contact an appellate attorney to discuss your case and appeal options. Preserve evidence of trial errors, attorney communications, and any issues affecting your conviction. Do not delay consulting counsel, as appellate deadlines are strict and early consultation ensures all options are preserved. Your attorney will file necessary notices within required timeframes, request trial transcripts, and begin legal analysis of your case. Provide complete information about your trial, attorney’s performance, and any circumstances suggesting ineffective representation or trial court error. Early action protects your appellate rights and allows comprehensive development of your case.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields