When a criminal conviction occurs, the opportunity to appeal is a critical right that many defendants overlook. The appellate process allows you to challenge the conviction or sentence based on legal errors, procedural violations, or ineffective assistance of counsel. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we understand how to navigate the complex appellate system in Washington. Our team reviews trial records meticulously to identify issues that warrant appellate review and develop compelling arguments for reversal or resentencing. Whether your conviction resulted from a felony or misdemeanor charge, we provide thorough representation throughout the appeals process.
Appeals offer a legitimate pathway to challenge unjust convictions and sentences. Many trial-level errors go unaddressed without proper appellate advocacy. Our representation ensures that legal arguments are thoroughly researched, clearly presented, and strategically developed to maximize your chances of success. We examine trial transcripts, legal precedent, and sentencing records to build a compelling case for appellate relief. Having skilled appellate counsel can mean the difference between a conviction standing or being reversed entirely. Our commitment is to ensure your rights are protected at every stage of the appellate process.
The criminal appeals process begins with filing a notice of appeal within strict statutory deadlines. This notice must be filed in the trial court and signals your intent to challenge the conviction. From there, a trial transcript must be obtained and reviewed for potential errors. Our attorneys analyze whether trial court decisions violated your constitutional rights, involved improper evidentiary rulings, or resulted from procedural mistakes. We also evaluate whether jury instructions were accurate and whether sentencing was within legal parameters. This comprehensive review forms the foundation of our appellate strategy.
A detailed written document filed with the appellate court that presents legal arguments, case citations, and factual analysis supporting your position on appeal. The brief must address preservation of error and explain why the trial court’s decision should be reversed or modified based on legal principles and precedent.
A claim that your trial attorney’s performance fell below professional standards and prejudiced your defense. This ground for appeal requires showing both that counsel’s performance was deficient and that it affected the trial outcome.
The requirement that objections or challenges be made during trial to preserve the issue for appellate review. Failure to raise an issue at trial generally prevents appellate courts from considering it on appeal.
A legal mistake that occurred during trial but did not substantially affect the verdict or sentence. Harmless errors typically do not provide grounds for reversal on appeal.
Your notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of sentencing in felony cases and 10 days in misdemeanor cases. Missing this deadline generally bars you from pursuing appellate relief entirely. Contact our office immediately after conviction to ensure your appellate rights are protected and preserved.
Appellate courts can only review errors that appear in the trial record or were properly objected to during trial. Our team ensures that necessary documents, transcripts, and exhibits are obtained and organized for appellate review. Thorough record preservation is critical to identifying viable grounds for appeal.
Not every trial error justifies reversal—appellate courts apply harmless error analysis to determine whether mistakes affected your rights. Our attorneys know how to distinguish between errors that demand reversal and those deemed harmless. Understanding this distinction helps focus appellate arguments on the most compelling issues.
When your conviction involved violations of constitutional rights—such as improper searches, Miranda violations, or right to counsel issues—comprehensive appellate representation is essential. These constitutional errors can provide strong grounds for reversal and warrant thorough appellate advocacy. Our attorneys conduct in-depth analysis to develop persuasive constitutional arguments for the appellate court.
If your trial attorney’s performance was deficient and prejudiced your defense, a comprehensive appeal addressing ineffective assistance claims requires detailed factual investigation and legal analysis. We gather evidence of counsel’s failures, establish prejudice to your case outcome, and present compelling arguments for appellate relief. This type of appeal demands thorough preparation and strategic legal argumentation.
Some appeals focus narrowly on sentencing issues—such as miscalculations of guidelines or illegal sentence enhancements—without challenging the underlying conviction. When sentencing error is clear and well-documented, a focused appeal addressing only the penalty may be appropriate. This streamlined approach can effectively pursue resentencing relief.
Appeals based on established procedural violations with clear governing precedent may not require extensive briefing on multiple issues. When case law strongly supports your position, concentrating arguments on the strongest procedural issue can be an efficient strategy. Our attorneys assess which focused approach maximizes your appellate success.
Convictions resulting from jury trials provide multiple grounds for appellate challenge, including jury instruction errors and evidentiary rulings. Appeals of jury verdicts often succeed when jurors were misdirected or improper evidence was considered.
When judges impose sentences substantially above recommended guidelines without adequate justification, appellate review can result in resentencing. Challenging disproportionate sentences is a viable appellate strategy with documented success.
When trial evidence appears insufficient to support conviction beyond reasonable doubt, appellate courts can overturn verdicts. Insufficient evidence claims provide powerful grounds for appellate relief and reversal.
Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd has successfully represented clients through the appellate process across Washington State. Our attorneys bring proven experience in identifying appellable issues, developing compelling legal arguments, and securing favorable appellate outcomes. We understand the specific requirements of Washington appellate courts and tailor our strategy accordingly. Our team works diligently to review trial records, research governing law, and craft briefs that persuasively advocate your position. When you choose our firm, you gain access to counsel with substantial appellate practice background and a demonstrated commitment to pursuing justice through the appeals process.
We recognize that the appellate process can be confusing and overwhelming for clients facing an uncertain legal landscape after conviction. Our approach emphasizes clear communication about your appellate options, realistic assessment of case strengths, and thorough preparation at every stage. We maintain detailed contact with clients throughout briefing, oral argument preparation, and appellate court decision. Our goal is to provide compassionate, professional representation while aggressively pursuing every legitimate avenue for appellate relief. Contact us today to discuss your appeal and begin working toward a resolution that protects your rights.
In Washington, the notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of sentencing in felony cases. For misdemeanor convictions, the deadline is 10 days from sentencing. Missing this deadline is generally fatal to your appellate rights unless exceptional circumstances exist that warrant late filing. Our attorneys ensure strict compliance with all appellate deadlines to preserve your right to appeal. Once the notice of appeal is filed, the appellate process can proceed with adequate time for record review and brief preparation. Prompt action is essential—contact our office immediately after conviction to protect your appellate rights.
Yes, you can appeal after entering a guilty plea, though the grounds for appeal are more limited than when challenging a jury verdict. Appeals after guilty pleas typically address issues such as ineffective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations, constitutional violations in the plea process, or sentencing errors. You cannot generally challenge the factual basis of guilt through appeal after guilty plea, but legal and procedural issues remain subject to appellate review. Our attorneys evaluate whether constitutional or procedural defects in your plea agreement provide grounds for appeal and relief. If we identify viable issues, we pursue appellate remedies to challenge your conviction or sentence.
An ineffective assistance of counsel claim challenges your attorney’s performance during trial, arguing that their conduct fell below professional standards and prejudiced your case outcome. To succeed on this claim, you must show both that your attorney’s performance was deficient—such as failing to present evidence or investigate vital issues—and that this deficiency likely affected the verdict or sentence. Ineffective assistance claims require detailed factual analysis comparing actual performance against professional conduct standards. These claims can provide powerful grounds for appellate relief and even conviction reversal, especially when trial counsel failed to pursue obvious defense strategies or investigate significant mitigating factors.
The appellate process typically takes six months to two years from filing the notice of appeal through appellate court decision, depending on case complexity and court docket. Initial steps include obtaining trial transcripts and records, which can require several months. Brief writing and filing follow, with specific timelines established by appellate rules. After briefing is complete, the court schedules oral arguments if permitted, followed by decision issuance. Federal appeals may require additional time due to higher court dockets. Our attorneys manage the timeline efficiently while ensuring thorough preparation at each stage. We keep clients informed of progress throughout the process and prepare for potential oral argument or decision announcement.
Appellate courts review issues preserved during trial through proper objection or notice, including evidentiary errors, jury instruction mistakes, constitutional violations, and sentencing issues. Issues not preserved at trial generally cannot be raised on appeal unless exceptional circumstances apply. Constitutional errors may sometimes be reviewed even without preservation if they are fundamental to trial fairness. Ineffective assistance of counsel claims can be raised on appeal regardless of trial preservation. Our attorneys carefully analyze which trial issues are preserved and how to develop them persuasively on appeal. We identify the strongest potential grounds and focus appellate arguments on issues most likely to succeed.
Oral argument is not automatically granted in all appellate cases; some courts decide cases based solely on briefs. However, when requested and granted, oral argument provides an opportunity to directly address appellate judges and respond to their questions about your case. This personal presentation can significantly influence judicial decision-making and provides a platform to emphasize your strongest arguments. Our attorneys are experienced in appellate oral argument preparation and presentation. We prepare thoroughly to anticipate judicial questions and deliver compelling arguments that reinforce written briefs. Oral argument, when available, becomes a critical component of our appellate strategy.
Yes, you can appeal your sentence without appealing the conviction itself. Sentence-only appeals focus on whether the imposed penalty is legal, proportionate to the offense, and within statutory guidelines. Reasons for sentencing appeal include guideline calculation errors, improper sentence enhancements, or judges exceeding authority. This approach is often strategic when conviction has limited appeal grounds but sentencing concerns are substantial. Our attorneys identify sentencing issues that warrant appellate review and pursue resentencing relief. Sentence-only appeals can be efficient when conviction was fairly tried but penalty determination contained legal error.
After the appellate court issues a decision, outcomes include affirmance (conviction upheld), reversal (conviction overturned), or remand (case sent back for new trial or resentencing). If reversed, the prosecution may retry you, or charges may be dismissed if reversal is based on insufficient evidence. If remanded for resentencing, the trial court imposes a new sentence within legal parameters. You may petition for further review if the appellate decision can be challenged before a higher court. Our attorneys explain all available options following appellate decision and represent you in any subsequent proceedings. We pursue post-decision remedies that may further advance your interests.
Appellate representation costs vary depending on case complexity, whether oral argument is required, and the extent of record review needed. Some cases require focused appeals on specific issues, while others demand comprehensive brief writing addressing multiple grounds. We discuss fee arrangements and cost estimates during initial consultation. Many clients benefit from understanding the financial investment relative to potential appellate relief outcomes. Our firm offers transparent fee discussions to help clients make informed decisions about pursuing appellate representation. We work efficiently to provide thorough advocacy while controlling costs where possible.
Post-conviction relief petitions challenge convictions on grounds different from appeals, typically addressing constitutional violations or newly discovered evidence not available at trial. Appeals challenge trial court decisions and legal errors; post-conviction petitions focus on conviction validity based on new circumstances. Some grounds for relief are available only through post-conviction petitions, while others must be addressed on appeal. Our attorneys evaluate whether your situation warrants appellate or post-conviction strategy or both. Some cases benefit from filing successive post-conviction petitions on different grounds as new evidence emerges. We advise clients on the most strategic path to pursue conviction relief based on individual case circumstances.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields