If you have been convicted of a crime in Liberty Lake or Spokane County, an appeal may provide an opportunity to challenge your conviction or sentence. The appeals process involves presenting legal arguments to a higher court, focusing on errors that may have occurred during trial or sentencing. Our firm understands the complexities of appellate law and works diligently to identify viable grounds for appeal. Time is critical in these matters, as strict deadlines apply to filing appeals. We provide thorough case reviews and strategic guidance to help you understand your options and rights.
An appeal may be your last opportunity to correct errors in your case and protect your legal rights. Even if you accepted a plea or were convicted at trial, appellate review can identify issues that warrant reversal or modification. Successful appeals have resulted in reduced sentences, new trials, and complete dismissals of charges. Beyond the immediate legal outcome, an appeal allows your case to receive thorough examination by a neutral appellate court. We understand the emotional and financial toll of incarceration, and we work to exhaust all viable appellate remedies to improve your situation.
The criminal appeals process begins with filing a notice of appeal within strict statutory deadlines, typically within thirty days of sentencing. Your appellate attorney then obtains trial records and begins identifying potential legal errors or constitutional issues for appeal. The appellate brief is a written legal document presenting your arguments to the court, supported by citations to case law and the trial record. The prosecution responds with their own brief, and oral argument may be scheduled before a panel of appellate judges. Appeals focus on legal questions rather than factual disputes, making the quality of legal analysis crucial to success.
A formal document filed with the court to initiate the appellate process, which must be filed within statutory deadlines following sentencing or conviction.
A written legal document presenting arguments to the appellate court, identifying errors in the trial court and supporting why the conviction or sentence should be reversed.
The legal standard an appellate court applies when examining trial court decisions, ranging from strict scrutiny for constitutional issues to abuse of discretion for evidentiary rulings.
A constitutional claim asserting that trial counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial, which can support an appeal or post-conviction motion.
The deadline to file a notice of appeal is typically thirty days from sentencing, and missing this deadline eliminates your appellate rights in most situations. Contact an appellate attorney immediately after conviction to ensure deadlines are met and your case is properly documented. Delaying action can result in waiving valuable appellate claims.
Appellate courts review only the trial record, so it is essential to ensure a complete and accurate record of your trial proceedings. During trial, raise objections and create a clear record of any errors or issues you want reviewed on appeal. After conviction, ensure all relevant documents, transcripts, and filings are obtained for appellate review.
Different legal errors are reviewed under different standards on appeal, and not all trial court decisions can be overturned. Work with an attorney who understands which errors in your case meet the applicable standard for reversal. Knowing realistic prospects helps you make informed decisions about your appeal.
If your trial involved numerous errors, constitutional violations, or questionable legal rulings, comprehensive appellate representation ensures all viable claims are thoroughly developed and presented. Multiple issues require coordinated legal strategy and extensive briefing to be effective. An attorney handling only one claim may miss other potentially stronger arguments for reversal.
Felony convictions and lengthy sentences justify comprehensive appellate effort to explore every possible basis for relief. The stakes are higher with serious charges, making thorough legal analysis and strategic advocacy essential. Full representation includes examining sentencing errors, enhancement issues, and all available post-conviction remedies.
If your case involves one identifiable error that clearly prejudiced your trial, focused appellate work on that specific issue may be effective. Addressing a single strong claim thoroughly can sometimes be more persuasive than raising multiple weaker arguments. This approach works best when the error is obvious and well-supported by case law.
Misdemeanor convictions with short sentences may warrant a more focused appellate review of specific issues rather than exhaustive analysis. Limited representation can still identify reversible errors while managing costs. However, even misdemeanor convictions deserve competent appellate review to protect your record and rights.
If your trial attorney failed to present defenses, missed important legal objections, or performed inadequately, you may have grounds for appeal based on ineffective assistance of counsel. These claims can support reversal or new trial.
Improper jury instructions, evidentiary rulings, or procedural errors during trial can support appellate claims. Courts sometimes make mistakes in applying the law that prejudice your case.
Violations of your constitutional rights during trial, such as improper search and seizure or right to counsel issues, provide strong grounds for appeal. These claims receive searching appellate review.
Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd understands that your conviction and potential incarceration have profound consequences for your life, family, and future. We approach every appeal with the seriousness and attention it deserves, conducting thorough case review and developing strong legal arguments. Our attorneys are familiar with appellate procedure and the judges who hear criminal appeals in Washington State. We communicate regularly with clients about case progress and maintain realistic expectations about appellate prospects. Your appeal is not a routine matter to us—it is an opportunity to seek justice and protect your rights.
We serve clients throughout Liberty Lake, Spokane County, and Washington State with dedicated appellate representation. Our firm has successfully handled appeals involving various criminal charges, from drug offenses to violent crimes and white-collar matters. We are committed to thorough legal research, meticulous brief writing, and effective oral argument. We understand the emotional toll of the appellate process and provide compassionate representation alongside aggressive advocacy. Contact us today to discuss whether an appeal is viable in your case and how we can help.
In Washington, the deadline to file a notice of appeal is typically thirty days from the date of sentencing or conviction. This deadline is strictly enforced, and missing it generally eliminates your appellate rights unless exceptional circumstances apply. It is critical to contact an appellate attorney immediately after conviction to ensure your deadline is met and your appeal is properly filed. If you discover a conviction issue after the initial deadline has passed, you may still have options through post-conviction motions or other legal remedies. However, these alternative remedies have their own deadlines and requirements. Acting quickly is essential to protect your rights.
Yes, you can appeal a conviction even if you pleaded guilty. While guilty pleas are generally presumed valid, appellate courts can review whether your plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. You may also appeal issues related to sentencing, trial court errors that occurred before the plea, or ineffective assistance of counsel in advising you regarding the plea. Appellate review of guilty pleas focuses on different issues than trial convictions, but viable grounds for appeal may still exist. An appellate attorney can review the circumstances of your plea and determine whether appellate relief is possible in your situation.
Criminal appeals can be based on various legal errors, including trial court procedural mistakes, improper jury instructions, evidentiary errors, and constitutional violations. Ineffective assistance of counsel claims are also viable grounds for appeal if your trial attorney’s performance was deficient and prejudiced your defense. Factual disputes generally cannot be appealed, as appellate courts review legal questions, not whether the jury correctly resolved facts. The key is identifying legal errors that affected your trial outcome or violated your constitutional rights. An attorney can review your case to determine which errors support a viable appeal.
Criminal appeals typically take one to two years from filing to final decision, though timelines vary based on court workload, case complexity, and whether oral argument is scheduled. Appellate briefing schedules are set by the court and generally allow several months for each side to submit written arguments. After briefing is complete, the appellate court reviews your case and may schedule oral argument. The decision is issued sometime after argument or submission. Expedited appeals are rarely granted, so patience and realistic timeline expectations are important.
Ineffective assistance of counsel occurs when your trial attorney’s performance was inadequate and prejudiced your defense. This may include failing to investigate defenses, missing key legal objections, poor trial strategy, or inadequate representation. To succeed on this claim, you must show both deficient performance and resulting prejudice. Ineffective assistance claims are common grounds for post-conviction relief and appeal. They require detailed analysis of trial performance and strategic decision-making. If you believe your trial attorney provided inadequate representation, discuss this issue with an appellate attorney.
Yes, an appeal can result in a reduced sentence if sentencing errors are identified or circumstances warrant modification. Appellate courts can review whether sentencing was excessive, whether proper legal standards were applied, and whether your sentence was consistent with applicable law. Sentence modification appeals have succeeded in many cases, resulting in reduced prison time or alternative sentences. While not every appeal results in sentence reduction, this remains a valuable basis for appellate review when supported by legal grounds.
If your appeal is denied, you may have additional options depending on the appellate court’s decision and your circumstances. You might pursue further review with the Washington Supreme Court, though such review is discretionary and granted only in exceptional cases. Post-conviction relief options may also remain available. If appeal and post-conviction remedies are exhausted, federal habeas corpus review may be possible in some cases. An attorney can explain what options remain and whether continued legal action is viable in your situation.
In most cases, you serve your sentence while your appeal is pending unless the appellate court grants a stay of execution of sentence. Stays are rarely granted and require showing that you are likely to succeed on appeal and that remaining free pending appeal is in justice’s interest. Bail pending appeal is sometimes possible if your appeal presents substantial constitutional issues or raises novel legal questions. Discuss bail options with your appellate attorney when evaluating your appeal strategy.
Post-conviction relief generally refers to legal remedies available after direct appeal, including motions for new trial, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, or habeas corpus petitions. These remedies allow you to raise issues that could not be addressed through direct appeal or that arose after conviction. Post-conviction relief has different standards and procedures than direct appeal, and eligibility depends on the type of relief sought and your specific circumstances. An attorney can advise you about post-conviction options that may be available.
Appeal costs vary based on case complexity, the number of issues involved, and whether oral argument is required. Costs typically include attorney fees for case review, legal research, brief writing, and potentially oral argument. Some clients qualify for public defender appellate representation if they cannot afford private counsel. During a free consultation, we can provide a better estimate of costs based on your specific case. Payment arrangements may be available to make appellate representation more accessible.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields