If you have been convicted of a crime in Washington, an appeal may provide an opportunity to challenge your conviction or sentence. The Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd represents clients throughout Country Homes and Spokane County who are pursuing appeals and post-conviction relief. Our attorneys understand the complexities of appellate procedure and work diligently to identify legal errors that may have occurred during your trial or sentencing. We review court records, transcripts, and evidence to build compelling arguments on your behalf.
Appeals provide a critical mechanism for addressing legal errors that may have affected your trial outcome or sentencing decision. Even if trial counsel was competent, appellate review can identify constitutional violations, evidentiary problems, or procedural errors that warrant reversal or modification. Post-conviction relief options, including motions under RCW 10.73.100, allow you to raise new claims that were unavailable at trial. Pursuing these remedies protects your constitutional rights and may result in a new trial, sentence reduction, or conviction reversal. The consequences of not pursuing available relief can be permanent, making timely action essential.
Criminal appeals in Washington are addressed through multiple procedural mechanisms depending on your circumstances. Direct appeals challenge trial-level decisions and are typically filed within specific timeframes after sentencing. Post-conviction relief petitions, motions for reconsideration, and habeas corpus petitions offer additional avenues for challenging convictions based on ineffective assistance of counsel or newly discovered evidence. Each remedy has distinct requirements, deadlines, and standards of review that must be carefully navigated.
A direct appeal challenges trial-level decisions and is filed immediately after sentencing. It is typically the first appellate opportunity available and must be filed within strict deadlines established by Washington rules of appellate procedure.
A post-conviction claim asserting that trial counsel’s performance fell below reasonable professional standards and prejudiced your defense, potentially entitling you to a new trial under the Strickland test.
The standard of review determines how thoroughly an appellate court examines trial court decisions. Common standards include abuse of discretion, clearly erroneous, and constitutional error, each requiring different levels of appellate scrutiny.
A civil petition filed after sentencing raising claims not available on direct appeal, such as ineffective assistance of counsel, newly discovered evidence, or constitutional violations discovered after trial completion.
Washington law imposes strict filing deadlines for appeals that cannot be extended without exceptional circumstances. Missing these deadlines can result in permanent loss of appellate rights. Contact an attorney immediately after sentencing to ensure your appeal is filed timely and preserves all available remedies.
Effective appeals depend on issues being properly raised and objected to at trial. If trial counsel failed to object to certain legal errors, this may impact appellate review. An attorney can analyze whether the issue was properly preserved and determine if post-conviction remedies are available.
Thorough appellate review requires complete trial transcripts, court documents, and evidence records. Ensure all necessary materials are obtained from the trial court before appellate briefing begins. Missing records can limit the arguments available on appeal.
When your case involves constitutional claims, evidentiary disputes, or procedural complexities, comprehensive appellate representation becomes essential. These matters require detailed legal research, citation to relevant case law, and careful analysis of appellate standards. Attempting to navigate these issues without professional assistance significantly reduces your chances of success.
Cases with several potential grounds for reversal benefit from comprehensive appellate strategy. An experienced appellate attorney can identify all viable arguments, prioritize them effectively, and present them persuasively to the court. Strategic selection and sequencing of arguments significantly enhances appellate prospects.
Some cases present one identifiable legal error that clearly warrants reversal or modification. When a specific issue stands out as dispositive, focused appellate briefing addressing that particular claim may be sufficient.
Sentencing appeals challenging calculation of guidelines or imposition of illegal sentences may require less extensive briefing than conviction challenges. When the sentencing issue is clear and documented, a focused approach addressing that specific concern may be appropriate.
When trial counsel failed to present important defenses, failed to cross-examine witnesses effectively, or made strategic errors, post-conviction relief may be available. These situations often result in successful claims for new trials based on ineffective assistance.
Improperly admitted evidence, excluded exculpatory evidence, or prosecutorial misconduct regarding evidence presentation frequently provides grounds for appellate reversal. Courts take evidentiary errors seriously when they affect trial fairness.
Improper sentence calculations, imposition of illegal sentences, or failure to consider mitigating factors can all be challenged on appeal. Sentencing appeals often succeed when specific guideline errors or legal violations occurred.
The Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd understands that your appeal may be your last opportunity to challenge a conviction or sentence. We approach each case with the seriousness it deserves, conducting thorough analysis of trial records and developing persuasive appellate arguments. Our attorneys are familiar with Washington appellate procedures, court rules, and the judges who will review your case. We provide clear communication throughout the appellate process and work diligently to achieve the best possible outcome.
We serve clients throughout Country Homes, Spokane County, and Washington, handling appeals in both the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court. Our team includes attorneys with extensive appellate experience and a track record of successful outcomes. We understand the unique challenges of appellate practice and are committed to presenting your case effectively to higher courts. Contact us today to discuss your appeal and learn how we can help protect your rights.
A direct appeal challenges trial-level decisions immediately after sentencing and must be filed within strict deadlines. Direct appeals are based on the trial record and focus on legal errors that occurred during trial or sentencing. Post-conviction petitions, filed after direct appeals conclude, raise claims not available on direct appeal, such as ineffective assistance of counsel or newly discovered evidence. Post-conviction petitions involve civil procedures and may allow for factual development through evidentiary hearings. Both remedies are important components of comprehensive appellate relief, each serving distinct purposes in the post-conviction process. Understanding which avenue applies to your situation is crucial for protecting your rights.
In Washington, a notice of appeal must generally be filed within thirty days of sentencing. This deadline is strictly enforced, and extensions are only granted in exceptional circumstances. Missing this deadline can result in permanent loss of appellate rights, making immediate action essential after conviction. Some post-conviction petitions have different filing deadlines, such as the one-year deadline for ineffective assistance of counsel claims under RCW 10.73.100. Understanding applicable deadlines for your specific situation requires prompt consultation with an appellate attorney. Contact us immediately if you are considering an appeal to ensure all deadlines are met.
Successful appeals typically involve clear legal errors that affected trial fairness or sentencing validity. These may include constitutional violations, evidentiary mistakes, procedural errors, or ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellate courts apply different standards of review depending on the nature of the claim, with some errors being reversible per se while others require demonstration of prejudice. Strong appellate briefs present compelling legal arguments supported by relevant case law and thorough analysis of the trial record. Success depends on identifying viable issues, presenting them persuasively, and demonstrating how errors warrant reversal or modification. Our attorneys analyze all potential grounds for relief to maximize your chances of success.
Appeals following plea agreements are limited because most trial issues are waived by pleading guilty. However, you may appeal on grounds that do not challenge the guilty plea itself, such as sentencing errors or constitutional violations occurring after the plea. If your attorney failed to advise you properly about the consequences of your plea, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim may be available. You may also challenge whether your guilty plea was knowing and voluntary if circumstances support such a claim. Post-conviction relief may provide additional avenues for challenging aspects of your sentence. We can evaluate whether your specific situation provides grounds for appellate relief.
Ineffective assistance of counsel occurs when your trial attorney’s performance falls below reasonable professional standards and prejudices your defense. Examples include failure to investigate defenses, inadequate cross-examination, poor trial strategy, or failure to raise important legal objections. Under the Strickland test, you must show both that counsel’s performance was deficient and that this deficiency prejudiced your case, likely affecting the outcome. This claim is frequently raised in post-conviction petitions and can result in a new trial if successful. Many convictions involve attorney errors that might support such claims. An experienced appellate attorney can review your trial record to identify potential ineffective assistance issues.
Appellate costs vary depending on case complexity, length of trial record, and number of issues raised. Direct appeals typically involve briefing fees and potentially oral argument preparation. Post-conviction petitions may require factual investigation and evidentiary hearing preparation, increasing costs. We discuss fees transparently with clients and work to develop affordable representation plans. Many clients finance appeals through payment arrangements or by redirecting resources from other areas. Given the significant consequences of forgoing appeal opportunities, investing in professional representation is often worthwhile. Contact us for a consultation to discuss fees and available options for your specific case.
Oral argument allows attorneys to present arguments directly to the appellate court and respond to judicial questions. The court typically allows limited time for each side, requiring careful preparation and strategic focus on key issues. Judges often ask detailed questions about legal standards, case law, and application to your specific facts. Strong oral argument preparation involves anticipating likely questions and developing clear, concise responses. Not all appeals include oral argument, as some courts decide cases on briefs alone. When oral argument is permitted, thorough preparation with an experienced appellate attorney significantly enhances effectiveness. We prepare clients to support counsel during oral argument and explain the process.
Yes, you may appeal sentencing separately from conviction issues. Sentencing appeals focus on whether the imposed sentence violated laws or guidelines, whether proper procedures were followed, or whether mitigating factors were inadequately considered. Common sentencing appeal issues include guideline calculation errors, imposition of illegal sentences, or failure to adequately explain sentencing decisions. These appeals have different standards of review and focus specifically on sentencing validity rather than conviction sufficiency. Many sentencing appeals succeed because judges sometimes make clear errors in calculation or consideration of mitigating factors. If your primary concern involves your sentence rather than conviction validity, a focused sentencing appeal may be appropriate.
Habeas corpus petitions challenge the constitutional validity of your incarceration and may raise claims not available on direct appeal. These petitions assert that your conviction or sentence violates constitutional rights, such as ineffective assistance of counsel or violations of fundamental fairness. Habeas petitions may be filed in superior court or, in some circumstances, at the appellate level. They often allow for factual development through evidentiary hearings, distinguishing them from purely record-based direct appeals. Federal habeas corpus petitions may also be available after exhaustion of state remedies. Habeas relief can result in new trials, sentence reduction, or release from incarceration. We can evaluate whether habeas remedies are appropriate for your situation.
If you cannot afford appellate counsel, you may be eligible for public defense funding through the court system. Additionally, the Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd works with clients to develop affordable representation arrangements. Some attorneys also accept partial contingency arrangements where fees depend partly on successful outcomes. Appeal rights should not depend on financial circumstances alone. We encourage you to contact us to discuss your situation and available options. We are committed to ensuring qualified representation for appellate clients regardless of financial constraints. Your appeal may be your last opportunity for meaningful relief, making professional assistance a valuable investment.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields