Post-Conviction Relief Options
Appeals Lawyer in Arlington, Washington
Criminal Appeals and Post-Conviction Relief Guide
If you have been convicted of a crime in Washington, an appeal may provide an opportunity to challenge the conviction or sentence. The appeals process is complex and requires a thorough understanding of procedural rules and legal precedent. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we represent clients throughout Arlington and Snohomish County who seek to overturn convictions or reduce sentences through appellate review. Our team carefully examines trial records, identifies legal errors, and builds compelling arguments on your behalf to pursue the best possible outcome.
Why Criminal Appeals Matter
Criminal appeals provide a vital mechanism to challenge convictions and sentences that may have been affected by legal errors. An appeal can raise issues such as ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, improper jury instructions, or evidentiary problems that occurred at trial. Successfully overturning a conviction can mean the difference between freedom and incarceration. Additionally, appeals can result in sentence reductions or reversals, providing relief for individuals who believe their punishment was excessive or unjust. By pursuing appellate remedies, you maintain your right to judicial review and ensure that legal errors are corrected.
Our Appellate Practice and Background
Understanding Criminal Appeals
A criminal appeal is a request for a higher court to review a conviction or sentence imposed at trial. Appeals in Washington typically focus on issues of law rather than questions of fact. An appellate court will examine the trial record to determine whether legal errors occurred that affected the outcome of the case. Common appellate issues include trial court errors in admitting or excluding evidence, improper jury instructions, insufficient evidence to support the conviction, or violations of constitutional rights. The appellate process requires filing detailed briefs that explain the legal errors and why they warrant reversal or modification of the conviction.
Need More Information?
Appeals and Post-Conviction Terminology
Appellate Brief
A written document filed with the appellate court that presents legal arguments and citations to authority supporting why a conviction or sentence should be reversed or modified. The brief includes the facts of the case, relevant law, and analysis of how legal errors affected the trial.
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
A post-conviction claim alleging that a defendant’s trial attorney failed to provide adequate legal representation. To succeed, a defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that this deficiency prejudiced the defense outcome.
Direct Appeal
An appeal brought immediately after a conviction in which the appellate court reviews the trial record for legal errors. Direct appeals are a defendant’s first opportunity to challenge a conviction based on issues that were preserved during trial.
Preserved Issue
A legal issue that was properly raised and objected to during trial, creating a record for appellate review. Issues not preserved at trial are generally not reviewable on appeal unless they involve constitutional violations.
PRO TIPS
File Your Appeal Promptly
Appeals in Washington must be filed within strict deadlines that begin after sentencing. Missing the deadline to file a notice of appeal can result in losing your right to appeal entirely. Contact an attorney immediately after conviction to ensure all appellate rights are preserved and timely pursued.
Preserve Issues During Trial
Many appellate issues must be raised and objected to at trial to be reviewable on appeal. Your trial attorney should lodge clear objections to rulings or evidence that you believe is unfair or improper. Failure to preserve an issue at trial can prevent it from being reviewed on appeal, unless it involves fundamental constitutional violations.
Gather and Organize Records
A thorough appeal requires careful review of trial transcripts, exhibits, and all court documents. Organizing these materials chronologically helps identify errors and supports legal arguments in your appellate brief. Working with an attorney experienced in appeals ensures that all relevant materials are analyzed and presented effectively.
Appeals Versus Other Post-Conviction Remedies
When Full Appellate Representation Is Necessary:
Trial Errors That Affected Your Case
If the trial judge made legal errors in admitting evidence, giving jury instructions, or ruling on motions, those errors may support an appeal. Trial errors can range from evidentiary rulings to procedural mistakes that affected your right to a fair trial. An appellate attorney can examine the trial record and determine whether errors occurred that warrant reversal or a new trial.
Ineffective Assistance of Your Trial Attorney
If your trial attorney failed to present important evidence, failed to cross-examine witnesses effectively, or made other strategic errors, you may have grounds for a post-conviction claim. Ineffective assistance claims require demonstrating that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard and that the error prejudiced your defense. Post-conviction relief based on this claim is a common avenue for challenging convictions.
When Focused Post-Conviction Motions Suffice:
Newly Discovered Evidence After Trial
If evidence has emerged after trial that was not available during the original proceedings, a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence may be appropriate. This approach does not require a full appeal but rather focuses on a specific issue that may warrant reconsideration of your case.
Sentence Modification Based on Changed Circumstances
In some cases, a sentencing modification may be available if circumstances have changed since your original sentencing or if the original sentence was based on faulty information. Requesting sentence review focuses on the punishment imposed rather than challenging the conviction itself. This targeted approach can achieve meaningful relief without pursuing a full appeal of the conviction.
Situations Where Appeals Are Commonly Pursued
Why Choose Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd for Your Appeal
When facing the appellate process, you need an attorney who understands Washington’s appellate rules and has successfully handled post-conviction matters. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we dedicate ourselves to thorough case analysis and persuasive legal advocacy. We carefully review your trial records, identify legal errors, and develop strategic appellate arguments designed to secure the best possible outcome. Our team works efficiently to meet all filing deadlines and procedural requirements while maintaining clear communication about your case status and options.
Our firm recognizes that appeals require a different skill set than trial representation, focusing on legal analysis and written advocacy rather than courtroom presentation. We bring years of experience navigating the appellate courts in Washington and understanding how appellate judges analyze cases. We combine thorough legal research with practical knowledge of appellate procedure to present compelling arguments on your behalf. If you believe your conviction was affected by legal error or that your sentence was unjust, contact us to discuss how we can help pursue post-conviction relief.
Contact Us for Your Appellate Consultation
People Also Search For
Criminal appeals Washington
Post-conviction relief Arlington
Ineffective assistance of counsel
Appeal conviction Washington
Direct appeal criminal case
Appellate attorney Snohomish County
Sentence modification appeal
Post-conviction motion lawyer
Related Services
FAQS
What is the deadline for filing a criminal appeal in Washington?
In Washington state, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the judgment of conviction is entered. This deadline is strictly enforced, and missing it can result in loss of the right to appeal. In some circumstances, such as when a post-conviction motion is filed, the deadline may be extended. However, it is critical to act quickly after conviction to preserve your appellate rights. If you are considering an appeal, contact an attorney immediately to ensure compliance with all deadlines. There are limited exceptions to the 30-day deadline. A defendant may request an extension for good cause, or may pursue other post-conviction remedies that have different deadlines. However, these exceptions are narrowly construed, and courts are unlikely to grant relief if the deadline has been missed without substantial justification. It is always safer to file your notice of appeal within the initial 30-day window to protect your rights.
Can I appeal my conviction if my trial attorney did not raise objections?
Some issues can be raised on appeal even if they were not objected to at trial, particularly if they involve fundamental constitutional violations or affect the fairness of the trial process. However, most issues require that proper objections be raised at trial to preserve them for appellate review. If objections were not made at trial, you may still pursue post-conviction relief through motions alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, arguing that your attorney should have objected to the errors. This is why working with an appellate attorney is crucial. We can examine the trial record and determine which issues are preserved for appeal and which may require post-conviction motions. Even issues that were not preserved at trial may have appellate value if they involve constitutional rights or other fundamental protections. Our role is to identify all available grounds for relief and pursue the strategy most likely to succeed.
What is the difference between a direct appeal and a post-conviction motion?
A direct appeal challenges the conviction based on the trial record and is filed immediately after sentencing. Direct appeals focus on legal errors that occurred at trial and are preserved in the record. In contrast, post-conviction motions are requests for relief based on grounds not apparent from the trial record, such as newly discovered evidence or ineffective assistance of counsel. Post-conviction motions may be filed at any time, though some have specific procedural requirements and deadlines. Both direct appeals and post-conviction motions are important tools for challenging convictions and sentences. Direct appeals are typically the first opportunity to challenge a conviction and must be pursued promptly. Post-conviction motions address different categories of claims that may not be obvious from the trial record alone. An experienced appellate attorney will advise which approach or combination of approaches is most appropriate for your case.
How long does the criminal appeals process take in Washington?
The appellate timeline in Washington varies depending on the complexity of the case and the court’s schedule. A direct appeal typically takes six months to two years from the time of filing until oral argument and decision. The time for briefing, which is the period when both sides file written arguments, is determined by court rules and can take several months. After briefing is complete, the appellate court schedules oral argument and issues a decision, which may take additional time. Post-conviction motions may take longer, particularly if they involve discovery or evidentiary hearings. The timeline also depends on the appellate court’s caseload and the complexity of the legal issues involved. While the process requires patience, our firm works efficiently to meet all deadlines and move your case forward. We keep you informed throughout the appellate process and explain what to expect at each stage.
Can appellate courts order a new trial?
Yes, appellate courts can order a new trial if legal errors at the original trial were significant enough to affect the outcome. A reversal with instructions for a new trial is one possible appellate remedy. The appellate court may also modify a conviction if evidence was legally insufficient or if other grounds for relief are established. In some cases, the appellate court may affirm the conviction but modify the sentence based on sentencing errors. The remedy available depends on the nature of the legal error and the evidence presented at trial. If the appellate court finds that the trial judge made significant errors or that the conviction was not supported by sufficient evidence, reversal and a new trial may be ordered. However, if errors are deemed harmless or do not affect the outcome, the conviction may be affirmed. Our role is to identify the best possible remedy and present arguments most likely to achieve it.
What is ineffective assistance of counsel?
Ineffective assistance of counsel is a post-conviction claim that argues your trial attorney failed to provide adequate legal representation. To succeed on this claim, you must show that counsel’s performance was deficient under objective standards and that this deficiency prejudiced the outcome of your case. Examples include failure to present important evidence, inadequate cross-examination of witnesses, or failure to raise valid legal objections. This is one of the most common grounds for post-conviction relief. Proving ineffective assistance requires demonstrating both components: that your attorney’s performance fell below an acceptable standard and that the error was likely to have changed the verdict. Courts recognize that trial strategy decisions are entitled to deference, so not every tactical decision constitutes ineffective assistance. However, errors that undermine the basic fairness of the trial may support relief. An appellate attorney can review your case to determine whether ineffective assistance claims are viable.
Can I appeal my sentence alone without appealing my conviction?
Yes, in many cases you can appeal your sentence separately from appealing the conviction itself. If you believe your sentence was excessive, based on incorrect information, or imposed in violation of sentencing law, you can request appellate review of the sentencing decision. A sentencing appeal may result in modification or reduction of your sentence without disturbing the underlying conviction. This can be a valuable remedy if the trial was fair but the punishment imposed was excessive. Sentencing appeals often focus on whether the trial court considered relevant factors, properly applied sentencing guidelines, or imposed a sentence within the legal range. Appellate courts have the authority to modify sentences they deem inappropriate, though they give trial judges significant deference in sentencing decisions. If you believe your sentence was improper, we can review the sentencing records and determine whether appellate relief is available.
What grounds support a post-conviction motion based on newly discovered evidence?
A post-conviction motion based on newly discovered evidence must show that evidence has emerged after trial that was not available during the original proceedings and that this evidence is likely to change the outcome if a new trial were held. The evidence must be material to guilt or innocence and not merely cumulative to evidence presented at trial. Additionally, the moving party must demonstrate that the evidence could not have been discovered earlier through reasonable diligence. This motion requires careful preparation and presentation of the new evidence. The trial court may hold an evidentiary hearing to consider the evidence before ruling on the motion. If successful, the motion may result in a new trial. However, courts are cautious about granting relief based on newly discovered evidence, as finality is important in criminal cases. An experienced attorney can evaluate whether newly discovered evidence meets the legal standards for relief.
How are appellate briefs structured and what should they contain?
An appellate brief is a written document that presents legal arguments to the appellate court. It typically includes a statement of the issues on appeal, a statement of facts based on the trial record, argument sections that address each legal issue with citations to law and relevant facts, and a conclusion requesting relief. The brief must comply with court rules regarding length, formatting, and citation standards. Strong appellate briefs are well-organized, clearly written, and persuasively argue why legal errors warrant reversal or modification. Briefing is a critical component of appellate advocacy because judges rely on written arguments rather than courtroom presentation. Our firm takes great care in drafting appellate briefs that clearly explain the legal errors, support arguments with relevant case law and statutory authority, and persuade judges that relief is warranted. After briefs are filed, oral argument may be scheduled, allowing attorneys to directly address the appellate panel.
What happens if I miss the deadline to file my appeal?
Missing the appellate deadline is a serious problem that typically results in loss of the right to appeal. Once the 30-day deadline passes without filing a notice of appeal, the trial court loses jurisdiction over the case and the appellate court generally cannot consider the appeal. This finality rule is strictly applied in Washington courts. However, there are limited exceptions, such as if you can show that you received ineffective assistance from your trial attorney in missing the deadline. If you have missed the deadline, immediate consultation with an appellate attorney is essential. In rare circumstances, relief may be available through a petition for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance. However, this is a difficult remedy to obtain and requires prompt action. To protect your rights, it is critical to contact an attorney as soon as possible after conviction to ensure all deadlines are met.