Post-Conviction Relief Matters
Appeals Lawyer in Dishman, Washington
Criminal Appeals and Post-Conviction Relief Legal Services
When a criminal conviction has been entered, the fight for justice doesn’t necessarily end. The appeals process provides a critical opportunity to challenge convictions, sentencing decisions, and procedural errors that occurred during trial. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we understand the complexities of appellate law and work diligently to identify legal grounds that may support your case. Our team reviews trial records, transcripts, and evidence to build compelling arguments for appeal in Dishman and throughout Washington.
Why Appeals and Post-Conviction Relief Matter
An appeal can overturn a conviction, reduce a sentence, or secure a new trial based on legal errors or newly discovered evidence. Many convictions contain reversible errors that appellate courts will correct when properly presented. Post-conviction relief provides pathways to challenge convictions years after trial, including claims involving ineffective assistance of counsel, newly discovered evidence, or Brady violations. Without aggressive appellate representation, these opportunities for justice may be lost forever. Our firm provides thorough appellate advocacy to give you the best chance at meaningful relief.
Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd's Appellate Practice
Understanding Appeals and Post-Conviction Relief
The appellate process involves filing a notice of appeal and then presenting legal arguments in written briefs to an appellate court. Unlike trials, appellate courts review records of lower court proceedings rather than hearing new testimony or evidence. Appellate attorneys must identify legal errors that affected the outcome and present persuasive arguments supported by case law and constitutional principles. The appellate court examines whether trial procedures were followed correctly, whether evidence was sufficient, and whether sentences were lawful and reasonable under applicable law.
Need More Information?
Appeals and Post-Conviction Relief Glossary
Direct Appeal
A direct appeal is the initial review of a criminal conviction by a higher court, typically within a set timeframe after sentencing. During a direct appeal, the appellate court examines the trial record to identify legal errors that may have affected the conviction or sentence.
Brady Violation
A Brady violation occurs when prosecutors fail to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. This violation of due process rights can form the basis for post-conviction relief if the undisclosed evidence could have affected the trial outcome.
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
This claim asserts that trial counsel provided representation falling below objective standards of reasonableness. To succeed, the defendant must show counsel’s deficient performance was prejudicial and likely affected the trial outcome.
Newly Discovered Evidence
Evidence that was unavailable or unknown during trial and could not have been discovered through reasonable diligence may support a motion for new trial. This evidence must be material and likely to result in acquittal if presented to a jury.
PRO TIPS
Preserve Your Appeal Rights Immediately
Time limits for filing appeals are strict and non-negotiable. You must file a notice of appeal within 30 days of sentencing in most cases to preserve your right to appellate review. Contact an appellate attorney immediately after conviction to ensure all procedural deadlines are met and your case is properly positioned for appeal.
Request a Continuance if Your Trial Counsel Cannot Appeal
If your trial attorney cannot continue representation for appellate purposes, motion practice exists to request additional time. Courts can grant continuances to allow appointment of new counsel or to provide time for proper case review and preparation of appellate documents.
Document All Trial Errors and Concerns
As soon as possible after trial, gather detailed notes about any errors, improper evidentiary rulings, or procedural violations you witnessed. These observations become invaluable during appellate review and help your attorney identify the strongest legal arguments for your appeal.
Comprehensive Appeals vs. Limited Appellate Strategies
When Full Appellate Representation Is Necessary:
Multiple Legal Issues Requiring Full Analysis
When your trial involved multiple potential errors—evidentiary issues, jury instruction problems, sentencing concerns—comprehensive appellate representation ensures each issue receives thorough analysis and inclusion in briefs. A full appellate strategy strengthens your overall case by presenting appellate courts with numerous grounds for reversal or relief. This comprehensive approach maximizes your chances of favorable appellate outcomes.
Serious Felony Convictions with Substantial Sentences
Felony convictions carrying significant prison time justify the investment in thorough appellate advocacy. Comprehensive representation includes detailed trial record analysis, extensive legal research, and carefully crafted briefs addressing all viable issues. The potential for sentence reduction or conviction reversal makes comprehensive appellate representation critically important in serious criminal cases.
When Focused Appellate Strategy May Suffice:
Clear Single Legal Issue With Strong Precedent
If your case involves one clear legal error with established appellate precedent supporting reversal, a focused appellate strategy addressing only that issue may prove effective. This streamlined approach concentrates resources on the strongest available argument. Court decisions in similar cases may strongly support relief based on this single issue.
Misdemeanor Convictions or Shorter Sentences
Misdemeanor convictions and shorter sentences sometimes warrant more limited appellate strategies focused on the most significant legal errors. While still important, these cases may not require the same comprehensive analysis as serious felony appeals. A focused approach can still achieve meaningful results within reasonable cost parameters.
Common Situations Requiring Appeals and Post-Conviction Relief
Why Choose Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd for Your Appeal
Our firm brings substantial appellate experience and a proven track record of successful appeals and post-conviction relief outcomes. We understand the technical and strategic requirements of appellate practice, from strict procedural compliance to persuasive legal writing. Every appeal receives thorough analysis of trial records and identification of all viable legal issues. We work diligently to build the strongest possible arguments for our clients and maintain persistent advocacy throughout the appellate process.
We recognize that appeals represent a critical opportunity for justice after conviction. Our commitment to detailed case review, comprehensive legal research, and strategic appellate advocacy has helped numerous clients obtain conviction reversals, sentence reductions, and new trial grants. We provide compassionate representation while maintaining the aggressive advocacy necessary to succeed in appellate courts. When your freedom and future are at stake, you deserve appellate counsel with the knowledge and determination to fight for your rights.
Contact Us for Your Appellate Consultation
People Also Search For
criminal appeals lawyer Washington
post-conviction relief attorney Spokane County
appellate defense counsel Dishman
ineffective assistance of counsel claims
sentence reduction appeals Washington
federal habeas corpus petitions
Brady violation post-conviction motions
appellate court briefs and oral arguments
Related Services
FAQS
What is the deadline for filing a criminal appeal in Washington?
In Washington, you must file a notice of appeal within 30 days of sentencing to preserve your appellate rights. This deadline is absolute and cannot be extended except in extraordinary circumstances. If you miss this deadline, your direct appeal rights may be permanently lost, making timely action essential. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may request a court-appointed appellate counsel. Your trial attorney should file the notice of appeal immediately upon request, or you can file it yourself if necessary. Contact an appellate attorney as soon as possible after conviction to ensure proper procedures are followed.
Can I appeal if I already accepted a plea agreement?
Yes, you can appeal even after accepting a plea agreement, but the issues you can raise are limited. Appellate courts will only review questions of law, not the voluntariness of your guilty plea unless you can show the plea was entered unknowingly or involuntarily. You can appeal issues such as whether the trial court had jurisdiction, whether your sentence exceeded statutory limits, or whether the plea agreement contained illegal terms. Many guilty pleas include waiver agreements that restrict appellate rights, but some issues cannot be waived. If you have concerns about your plea, discuss them immediately with an appellate attorney who can evaluate which issues may be preserved for appeal despite your plea agreement.
What is an ineffective assistance of counsel claim?
An ineffective assistance of counsel claim alleges that your trial attorney provided representation falling below objective standards of reasonableness and that this deficient performance prejudiced your defense. Under Strickland v. Washington, you must demonstrate specific instances of inadequate representation and show how counsel’s performance likely affected the trial outcome. Common examples include failure to investigate defenses, poor cross-examination, failure to file timely motions, and inadequate opening or closing statements. These claims require careful documentation and analysis of trial records. An appellate attorney can identify whether your trial counsel’s performance meets Strickland standards for ineffectiveness and whether the deficiency was prejudicial. Successful ineffective assistance claims often result in new trials where you can have constitutionally adequate representation.
How long does the appellate process typically take?
The appellate timeline varies depending on the complexity of your case and the court’s schedule. Direct criminal appeals typically require four to eighteen months from notice of appeal to appellate decision. The process includes filing the record on appeal, writing and filing briefs, waiting for scheduling, and potentially participating in oral argument. Some cases are decided based on briefs alone, while others include oral argument before the appellate panel. Post-conviction relief motions may proceed more quickly, sometimes resulting in decisions within months. Federal habeas petitions, however, can take much longer, sometimes spanning years. Your appellate attorney can provide timeline estimates based on your specific case and the court involved.
What is post-conviction relief and how does it differ from appeal?
Post-conviction relief encompasses several mechanisms for challenging convictions after direct appeal has concluded. These include motions for new trial based on newly discovered evidence, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, petitions based on Brady violations, and federal habeas corpus petitions. Direct appeals must be filed quickly after conviction, but post-conviction relief can often be pursued years later if new evidence or grounds emerge. Post-conviction relief allows challenges based on issues not available on direct appeal and provides opportunities when the appellate process has been exhausted. These remedies can result in conviction reversals, new trials, or sentence modifications. Federal habeas petitions available to state prisoners provide an additional layer of review in federal court.
Can newly discovered evidence support an appeal?
Yes, newly discovered evidence can support both direct appeal and post-conviction relief. To qualify, evidence must have been unavailable at trial despite reasonable diligence by defense counsel, must be admissible, and must be material and likely to result in acquittal if presented to a jury. Evidence that was available but not presented at trial generally does not qualify as newly discovered. Newly discovered evidence can include witness statements, DNA testing results, documents, or other tangible evidence. The standards for newly discovered evidence vary slightly between direct appeal and post-conviction motions, but both require showing the evidence could not have been obtained through reasonable investigation at trial time.
What are Brady violations and why do they matter on appeal?
Brady violations occur when prosecutors fail to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. This violation of due process rights can form the basis for conviction reversal or new trial. Evidence is exculpatory if it could reasonably be considered helpful to the defense, either by impeaching witness credibility or supporting innocence claims. Prosecutors have a duty to disclose such evidence even if the defense does not specifically request it. Brady violations can support both direct appeals and post-conviction petitions, particularly when the withheld evidence was substantial and affected trial outcomes. Our attorneys investigate whether prosecutors failed to disclose important evidence and present strong arguments that conviction reversal or new trials are warranted based on these prosecutorial failures.
Is oral argument always necessary in criminal appeals?
Oral argument is not automatic in criminal appeals but may be requested by counsel or ordered by the appellate court. Many courts allow oral argument in criminal cases unless the issues are straightforward or clearly resolved by existing law. When granted, oral argument provides opportunity to present persuasive arguments directly to appellate judges and respond to their questions. Courts often decide cases based entirely on written briefs without oral argument. Your appellate attorney can request oral argument if it would strengthen your case and assess the likelihood of the court scheduling argument. In criminal appeals, oral argument can be valuable for emphasizing key points, but well-written briefs are essential regardless of whether argument is granted.
What happens if my appeal is denied?
If your direct appeal is denied, additional remedies may still be available depending on your circumstances. You can petition for review to the Washington Supreme Court if your case involves constitutional issues or other qualifying criteria. You may also pursue post-conviction relief through motions based on newly discovered evidence, ineffective assistance claims, or Brady violations. Federal habeas corpus petitions in federal court provide another layer of review. The specific options available depend on your case facts and what issues were raised on direct appeal. An appellate attorney can evaluate your situation and advise on remaining avenues for relief. Some cases benefit from federal habeas petitions even after state appeals are exhausted, potentially resulting in relief based on constitutional violations or other federal law issues.
How much does appellate representation typically cost?
Appellate representation costs vary based on case complexity, the number of legal issues requiring analysis, and whether oral argument will occur. Some attorneys work on flat fee arrangements for criminal appeals, while others bill hourly. Post-conviction relief and federal habeas work may also be billed on flat fee or hourly bases depending on the attorney’s practice. If you cannot afford representation, court-appointed appellate counsel is available at no cost. During your consultation, discuss fee arrangements with your appellate attorney and understand what services are included. Many firms offer payment plans or flexible arrangements. Given the significant stakes involved in appeals, quality appellate representation is an important investment in your future.