A criminal conviction can profoundly impact your life, limiting your opportunities and affecting your family’s future. When a conviction is not just, an appeal provides a critical pathway to challenge the verdict and seek justice. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we understand the complexities of appellate law and work diligently to identify legal errors that may have affected your case. Our attorneys review trial records, examine procedural issues, and develop compelling arguments to present before appellate courts. Whether your conviction involved improper jury instructions, inadequate legal representation, or evidentiary errors, we evaluate every detail to build a strong appellate strategy.
A conviction entered at trial is not always final. Criminal appeals serve as a vital safeguard against legal errors, constitutional violations, and unfair proceedings. Appellate courts review trials for mistakes that may have prejudiced the outcome, including evidentiary errors, jury misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel, and violations of your constitutional rights. Pursuing an appeal demonstrates that you are committed to justice and willing to fight for your freedom. Even when direct appeals are exhausted, post-conviction remedies may remain available through habeas corpus petitions and other legal avenues. Having a qualified attorney who understands appellate procedure and can identify viable legal issues significantly increases the likelihood of obtaining relief.
A criminal appeal is a formal request to a higher court to review your conviction based on specific legal grounds. Unlike a new trial, appellate courts do not re-examine evidence or call witnesses; instead, they review the written trial record and legal arguments to determine whether errors occurred that warrant reversal or modification of your sentence. In Washington, direct appeals from felony convictions go to the Court of Appeals, with the possibility of further review by the Washington Supreme Court. Federal convictions may be appealed to the applicable U.S. Court of Appeals and potentially the U.S. Supreme Court. The appellate process involves extensive legal research, careful examination of trial transcripts, and persuasive written briefs arguing why the original conviction should be overturned or why sentencing should be reduced.
A direct appeal is a formal request to a higher court to review a conviction based on alleged errors in the trial record. It is the first level of appellate review available to a convicted defendant and must typically be filed within a specified timeframe after sentencing.
An appellate brief is a written legal document submitted to the court that presents arguments for why a conviction or sentence should be reversed or modified. It includes a summary of facts, identification of legal errors, and persuasive legal reasoning grounded in statutes and case law.
Harmless error doctrine allows appellate courts to uphold a conviction despite trial errors if those errors did not materially affect the verdict. To overturn a conviction on harmless error grounds, the defendant must demonstrate that the error had a substantial and injurious effect on the verdict.
Ineffective assistance of counsel refers to instances where a defendant’s attorney provided representation falling below reasonable professional standards, resulting in prejudice to the defense. Claims require proving both deficient performance and a reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different.
During trial, your defense attorney must make timely objections and create a clear record of legal issues for appeal. Without proper preservation of issues at trial, appellate courts may refuse to consider them on appeal under waiver doctrines. Consulting with an appellate attorney early allows for strategic planning to ensure all viable issues are properly documented.
Direct appeal deadlines are strict and typically begin from the date of sentencing or entry of judgment. Missing these deadlines can result in permanent waiver of your appellate rights with no opportunity for relief. Contacting our office immediately after conviction ensures we can file notices of appeal timely and begin the appellate process without delay.
If direct appeal opportunities are exhausted, other post-conviction remedies may remain available, such as habeas corpus petitions or motions under Strickland standards. Different remedies address different legal issues and have different procedural requirements. Our attorneys evaluate your complete situation to identify which avenues offer the best opportunity for relief.
If your trial involved evidentiary errors, improper jury instructions, constitutional violations, or procedural mistakes, a comprehensive appeal provides the opportunity to challenge those errors through established appellate procedures. Trial courts sometimes make mistakes that appellate courts can correct through careful legal review. Comprehensive appellate representation ensures all viable errors are identified and presented persuasively to the reviewing court.
If your trial attorney failed to present available defenses, conduct adequate investigation, or provide reasonable strategic planning, post-conviction claims for ineffective assistance may offer relief. These claims require demonstrating both that your attorney’s performance fell below professional standards and that you suffered prejudice as a result. Comprehensive evaluation by appellate counsel can identify whether ineffective assistance claims have merit and how to present them effectively.
Some cases involve clear sentencing errors or resentencing opportunities without broader trial issues. In such situations, focused representation addressing only sentencing concerns may achieve your goals. Our attorneys assess whether your primary opportunity for relief involves sentencing rather than conviction-related matters.
Certain appeals involve narrow procedural questions that don’t require extensive trial record review or complex legal analysis. When your appeal involves a specific procedural issue with clear precedent, targeted representation addressing that issue may be sufficient. Our team determines the appropriate scope of representation based on your case circumstances.
DUI convictions often involve chemical test procedures, breathalyzer calibration, field sobriety test administration, and Miranda rights issues that provide grounds for appellate challenge. Our attorneys understand the technical and legal issues unique to DUI appeals.
Drug charges frequently involve search and seizure issues, illegal police procedures, and controlled substance identification that may support appellate arguments. We examine whether law enforcement complied with constitutional requirements during investigation and arrest.
Cases involving assault, weapons charges, or homicide allegations often present complex evidentiary issues and jury instruction questions suitable for appellate review. Our attorneys have experience with the unique challenges presented by these serious charges.
When facing a criminal conviction, your choice of appellate counsel can determine whether you obtain relief or accept an unjust outcome. Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd brings decades of combined experience in criminal appellate work, trial practice, and post-conviction remedies. Our attorneys understand appellate procedures, judicial expectations, and the legal precedent that shapes appellate decisions. We approach each appeal methodically, reviewing trial records thoroughly to identify every potential issue, then crafting persuasive arguments tailored to the specific court hearing your case. Our team maintains strong relationships with courts throughout Washington and federal system, and we understand what moves appellate judges to reverse convictions or reduce sentences.
Beyond legal knowledge, we bring compassion and commitment to every client we represent. We recognize that an appeal represents your opportunity to challenge an unjust conviction and reclaim your future. We explain the appellate process clearly, keep you informed of progress, and answer your questions thoroughly. Our firm handles appeals on contingency arrangements when appropriate, ensuring that financial concerns don’t prevent you from accessing quality appellate representation. Whether your appeal raises constitutional issues, identifies trial errors, or challenges sentencing, we dedicate ourselves to presenting the strongest possible case to the appellate court. Contact Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd today to discuss your appeal options and take the next step toward justice.
In Washington, a notice of appeal must generally be filed within thirty days of the sentencing date or entry of the judgment and sentence. This deadline is strict, and missing it can result in waiver of your appellate rights unless you obtain an extension for good cause. It is critical to contact an appeals attorney immediately after conviction to ensure your deadline is met. For certain post-conviction remedies like habeas corpus petitions, different timeframes apply. Some claims may be available years after conviction, but delay can prejudice your position. Our attorneys advise clients on all applicable deadlines to ensure no opportunities for relief are lost through procedural defaults.
Yes, you can appeal even after entering a guilty plea, though the issues available for appeal are more limited than those available following a trial conviction. You can raise constitutional errors, sentencing issues, and certain claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal even after a guilty plea. However, by pleading guilty, you generally waive the right to challenge the facts underlying your conviction. Specific grounds for appealing a guilty plea conviction include claims that your plea was not knowing and voluntary, that you received ineffective assistance during the plea process, or that you were denied due process rights. Our attorneys evaluate guilty plea convictions to identify any viable appellate issues and explain your options for challenging the conviction or sentence.
Post-conviction relief under Strickland v. Washington standards involves claiming that your trial attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel. To succeed, you must prove both that your attorney’s performance was deficient (below the standard expected of reasonably prudent attorneys) and that this deficiency caused you prejudice (a reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different). Strickland claims can be pursued through habeas corpus petitions in Washington state court or federal court, depending on circumstances. These claims provide an avenue for relief even when direct appeals have been exhausted or when trial errors involve attorney performance rather than judge or jury mistakes. Our attorneys investigate trial strategies, decisions, and actions to evaluate whether ineffective assistance claims have merit in your case.
A direct criminal appeal in Washington typically takes between twelve and eighteen months from filing the notice of appeal to receiving the appellate court’s decision. The timeline includes time for obtaining trial transcripts, conducting legal research, preparing the appellate brief, responding to the state’s brief, and oral argument before the court. Cases involving multiple issues or complex legal questions may take longer. Post-conviction appeals and habeas corpus proceedings often take longer, sometimes extending two or more years before resolution. While the appellate process requires patience, the outcome can be life-changing. Our firm manages the process efficiently, meeting all deadlines and moving your case forward while conducting thorough legal work that maximizes your chances of success.
Oral argument is an opportunity for attorneys to present their case directly to appellate judges before a written decision is issued. During oral argument, your attorney explains the key legal issues, responds to judges’ questions, and argues why the conviction or sentence should be reversed or modified. The state’s attorney also presents arguments supporting the conviction. Oral argument typically lasts about thirty minutes per side, though time may vary. Oral argument is not guaranteed in all cases; some appeals are decided on the briefs alone. When oral argument is scheduled, thorough preparation is essential. Our attorneys prepare extensively for oral argument, anticipating judicial questions and ensuring clear, persuasive communication of your legal position. If you are able to attend, oral argument provides an opportunity to see the appellate process firsthand.
Yes, appellate courts can reduce sentences if they determine that the sentence was imposed in violation of the law, was excessive, or was imposed based on incorrect information. Washington law allows appellate review of sentences, and courts may remand for resentencing if errors occurred. Additionally, sentencing law changes sometimes create opportunities for reduced sentences through motions in the trial court or appellate petitions. Our attorneys review sentences to identify whether reduction grounds exist, including legal errors in sentencing calculations, failure to consider mitigating factors, or application of sentencing enhancements later determined to be unconstitutional or improperly applied. If resentencing opportunities are available, we pursue them aggressively to achieve sentence reduction for our clients.
Habeas corpus is a legal remedy challenging the legality of detention or imprisonment. In criminal cases, a habeas corpus petition argues that you are being unlawfully imprisoned due to constitutional violations, legal errors, or other grounds. Unlike direct appeals, which review only the trial record, habeas corpus petitions can include new evidence and claims not raised during trial or direct appeal. Habeas corpus relief is available in Washington state court and federal court, with federal habeas corpus (under 28 U.S.C. § 2254) typically pursued after state remedies are exhausted. Habeas corpus provides an avenue for relief on grounds such as ineffective assistance of counsel, newly discovered evidence, and constitutional violations that might not be available through other appellate procedures. Our attorneys evaluate whether habeas corpus is appropriate for your situation.
New evidence discovered after conviction may support a motion for new trial or post-conviction relief depending on the nature of the evidence and applicable procedural rules. Washington law allows relief based on newly discovered evidence if the evidence is material, could not have been discovered with reasonable diligence before trial, and creates a reasonable probability of a different result. Additionally, certain post-conviction remedies allow introduction of new evidence not contained in the trial record, including habeas corpus proceedings and investigations into ineffective assistance claims. If you have discovered evidence after your conviction that might support relief, it is important to consult with an appellate attorney promptly. Delay in pursuing newly discovered evidence claims can result in procedural bars to relief.
If your trial attorney failed to raise issues you believed important, those issues may be preserved through a direct appeal if they were preserved in the trial record, or through post-conviction claims of ineffective assistance of counsel if the attorney’s failure was deficient performance. An appellate attorney can review your trial record to identify issues that should have been raised and evaluate whether relief is available based on counsel’s performance. Some issues raised in direct appeal briefs may not have been preserved at trial, limiting appellate review. However, ineffective assistance claims under Strickland standards provide an avenue for relief even when issues were not preserved at trial. Our attorneys review your case thoroughly to identify whether direct appeal issues exist or whether post-conviction claims of ineffective assistance have merit.
The cost of a criminal appeal depends on the complexity of the case, the number of issues being raised, and the scope of work required. Our firm offers flexible fee arrangements for appellate cases, including hourly rates for post-conviction investigations and briefs, flat fees for straightforward direct appeals, and contingency arrangements in certain circumstances. We discuss costs transparently during initial consultation and provide estimates for appellate services. For clients unable to afford private appellate counsel, court-appointed appellate attorneys are available. Additionally, some legal aid organizations provide appellate services. Our firm strives to make quality appellate representation accessible. Contact us to discuss your situation and learn about fee options that work for your circumstances.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields