When a criminal conviction has been entered, the right to appeal is a critical opportunity to challenge legal errors, procedural mistakes, or insufficient evidence that may have affected your case. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we provide comprehensive appeals representation for clients throughout Wenatchee and Chelan County. Our team understands the complexities of appellate procedure and works diligently to identify viable grounds for reversal or case modification. Whether you were convicted after trial or entered a plea, we thoroughly examine trial records, transcripts, and legal precedent to build a compelling appeal that protects your rights and future.
A criminal conviction can alter your life trajectory, affecting employment, housing, family relationships, and personal freedom. Appeals offer a structured legal avenue to challenge convictions when errors have occurred. Appellate courts review whether trial courts made mistakes in applying the law, admitting or excluding evidence, instructing jurors, or protecting your constitutional rights. Successful appeals can result in conviction reversal, sentence reduction, or an order for a new trial with improved legal representation. Even when full reversal isn’t achieved, appellate victories can sometimes lead to plea negotiations or sentence modifications. For individuals serving lengthy sentences, appeals and post-conviction relief motions represent hope for meaningful change. We understand the emotional and practical importance of appellate representation and commit fully to each client’s case.
The criminal appeals process begins with filing a notice of appeal within strict statutory deadlines. In Washington, this deadline is typically 30 days from sentencing, though exceptions exist for certain circumstances. Once an appeal is filed, the trial court clerk prepares the record on appeal, including the transcript of proceedings, exhibits, and trial court documents. Our attorneys review this entire record meticulously to identify potential legal errors. These errors might include improper evidentiary rulings, jury instructions that misstate the law, prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel, or constitutional violations. We then prepare a detailed appellate brief arguing why these errors warrant reversal or modification of the conviction or sentence. The appellate court reviews our written brief, the prosecution’s response, and oral arguments before deciding the appeal.
The formal document filed with the trial court to initiate an appeal, which must be submitted within statutory deadlines. Filing a notice of appeal preserves your right to challenge the conviction on appellate review and triggers the preparation of the record on appeal.
A claim that your trial attorney’s performance fell below reasonable professional standards and prejudiced your defense. If proven, ineffective assistance claims can result in conviction reversal and a new trial with different representation.
The complete collection of documents, transcripts, and exhibits from your trial proceedings that the appellate court reviews. This record forms the foundation of appellate review and includes all evidence presented, jury instructions, and trial court rulings.
The legal standard that appellate judges apply when evaluating whether an error occurred at trial. Different standards apply to different issues, ranging from strict scrutiny for constitutional errors to abuse of discretion for other trial court decisions.
Do not miss the strict deadline for filing a notice of appeal, which is typically 30 days from sentencing in Washington. Missing this deadline can permanently bar your right to appeal in most cases. Contact an appellate attorney immediately after conviction to ensure timely filing and preservation of all potential appellate issues.
Appellate courts cannot review trial testimony or proceedings unless an accurate transcript exists. If you received a public defender, ensure the court appoints counsel to handle your appeal at no cost. Early transcript requests prevent delays in appellate briefing and help your attorney identify errors while details are fresh.
Traditional appeals address legal errors at trial, but other post-conviction remedies may apply to your situation. These include ineffective assistance of counsel claims, motions for DNA testing, and petitions based on newly discovered evidence. An experienced appellate attorney can evaluate which remedies offer the best chance of success for your specific circumstances.
Cases involving lengthy trials, complex evidence, or procedural issues require thorough appellate analysis. When your trial produced substantial transcripts or involved difficult legal questions about admissibility or jury instructions, comprehensive appellate representation ensures no viable errors are overlooked. Our team systematically reviews every aspect of your trial to identify grounds for successful appeal.
Cases involving lengthy prison sentences or multiple convictions justify the investment in comprehensive appellate representation. The potential benefits of sentence reduction or conviction reversal can be life-changing. Thorough appellate work may identify sentencing errors, constitutional violations, or legal developments that support successful challenge of these significant sentences.
Sometimes a conviction involves a clear, identifiable error that provides strong grounds for reversal. These might include improper evidence admission, jury instruction mistakes, or prosecutorial misconduct. When one or two significant errors stand out, focused appellate arguments addressing those issues may be sufficient to achieve reversal.
Washington sentencing laws have changed significantly in recent years, sometimes allowing sentence reduction for older convictions. If changes in law suggest your sentence exceeds current legal guidelines, a focused motion for resentencing may achieve meaningful relief without extensive appellate briefing on trial errors.
If you entered a guilty plea based on inadequate advice or misrepresentation about sentence exposure, ineffective assistance claims may support appeal or post-conviction relief. These claims require careful legal analysis but can result in conviction withdrawal and a new opportunity at trial.
When trial courts improperly exclude favorable evidence, admit prejudicial evidence, or give incorrect jury instructions, these errors may have changed the outcome of your trial. Appellate courts can reverse convictions based on such errors if they were not harmless beyond reasonable doubt.
Post-conviction relief is available when new evidence emerges that was unavailable at trial and would likely produce a different verdict. DNA evidence, recanting witnesses, or evidence of prosecutorial misconduct can support motions for new trial or conviction vacation.
Appeals are highly specialized legal work requiring different skills than trial representation. Our attorneys bring extensive experience in appellate procedure, legal research, and persuasive writing specific to appellate courts. We understand how appellate judges think, what arguments resonate, and how to structure briefs for maximum impact. We have successfully handled appeals addressing constitutional issues, evidentiary questions, sentencing disputes, and post-conviction claims. Our track record demonstrates our ability to identify viable appellate issues and present them persuasively. We treat every appeal with the seriousness it deserves, recognizing that this may be your last meaningful opportunity to challenge a conviction.
Beyond legal skill, we understand the emotional weight of criminal convictions and the hope that appeals represent. We maintain open communication with clients, explaining appellate procedure in understandable terms and managing expectations realistically. We explore all available remedies, including traditional appeals, post-conviction relief motions, and sentence modification opportunities. Our commitment extends throughout the entire appellate process, from filing the initial notice of appeal through oral argument and potential further proceedings. If you or a family member faces a criminal conviction in Wenatchee or throughout Washington, we encourage you to contact us immediately for a confidential consultation about your appellate options.
In Washington, the deadline for filing a notice of appeal is typically 30 days from the date of sentencing. This deadline is strict and mandatory in most cases. Missing this deadline can permanently bar your right to appeal unless extraordinary circumstances exist, such as attorney abandonment or miscommunication about appeal deadlines. Because this deadline is so critical, it is essential to contact an appellate attorney immediately after conviction or sentencing if you believe your conviction is appealable. There are limited exceptions to the 30-day deadline, including situations where you did not receive adequate notice of your appeal rights or where your trial attorney failed to file a notice of appeal despite your request. If you believe you missed the deadline due to circumstances beyond your control, consult with an appellate attorney immediately to explore potential remedies. Some cases can proceed through post-conviction relief motions even after direct appeal deadlines have passed.
Yes, guilty pleas can be appealed under certain circumstances. While appeals of guilty pleas are more limited than appeals of trial convictions, they are not impossible. You can appeal guilty pleas on grounds such as ineffective assistance of counsel, where your attorney failed to advise you properly about consequences or negotiate adequately on your behalf. Additionally, if the trial court failed to ensure your plea was knowing and voluntary, or if new law has changed the consequences of your conviction, appeal may be available. Effective assistance of counsel claims related to guilty pleas focus on whether your attorney adequately investigated the case, explained sentencing exposure, or negotiated a fair plea bargain. If your attorney’s performance fell below reasonable standards and prejudiced your defense, you may succeed in having your plea withdrawn and being afforded a new opportunity at trial. Post-conviction relief motions can also be used to challenge guilty pleas when new evidence emerges or when law changes affect your sentence.
Ineffective assistance of counsel occurs when your trial or appellate attorney’s performance was deficient and fell below the standard that reasonable attorneys would provide in similar circumstances. This can include failing to investigate the case adequately, failing to interview witnesses, failing to file motions, or providing inaccurate legal advice. The performance must have been so deficient that it undermined the adversarial process and affected the reliability of the verdict or sentence. This is a constitutional claim based on the Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel. To succeed on an ineffective assistance claim, you must demonstrate both that your attorney’s performance was deficient and that this deficiency prejudiced your defense. Prejudice means there is a reasonable probability that, but for the deficient performance, the outcome of your trial or sentencing would have been different. Ineffective assistance claims often arise when trial counsel failed to present certain defenses, failed to challenge evidence, or negotiated inadequate plea agreements. These claims provide an important avenue for appealing convictions even when direct appellate issues may not exist.
The appellate process typically takes between one and three years from filing the notice of appeal to receiving the appellate court’s decision. The timeline varies depending on the complexity of the case, the length of the trial record, caseload in the appellate court, and whether oral arguments are requested. Generally, after filing the notice of appeal and preparing the record, your attorney has time to research and write the appellate brief. The prosecution then files a response brief, and you have the opportunity to file a reply brief. After briefing is complete, the appellate court schedules the case for oral arguments or issues a decision based on written briefs. Some cases are decided more quickly if they involve straightforward issues or if the appellate court decides to issue a decision without oral arguments. Other cases take longer, particularly those involving complex legal issues or situations where the appellate court requests additional briefing. Throughout this process, our office maintains communication with clients, explaining what is happening and managing expectations about timing. While the appellate process requires patience, it also requires thorough legal work that takes time to do properly.
Criminal appeals can be based on numerous grounds, including legal errors at trial, constitutional violations, evidentiary problems, jury instruction errors, sentencing errors, or inadequate assistance of counsel. Common appellate issues include improper admission or exclusion of evidence, jury instructions that misstated the law, prosecutorial misconduct, Brady violations where prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence, and violation of constitutional rights such as the right to confront witnesses or right to remain silent. Your attorney will review the complete trial record to identify potential appellate issues. Sentencing-based appeals focus on whether courts imposed sentences that exceed legal authority or violated sentencing statutes. Appeals can also be based on changes in law that occurred after conviction, potentially allowing resentencing under new legal standards. Appellate courts will only consider issues that were properly raised at trial or in post-trial motions, which is why it is important to work with an attorney who understands appellate procedure and knows what issues to preserve for appeal.
DNA testing can be ordered through post-conviction relief motions in Washington under statutory procedures outlined in the post-conviction DNA testing statutes. To obtain DNA testing, you must establish that DNA testing is available, that it was not previously performed, that it is relevant to an issue in your case, and that there is a reasonable probability that the testing would produce exculpatory results. The request goes through the trial court, and if granted, testing is performed by a qualified laboratory. If DNA testing produces results that exonerate you or support your innocence claim, this evidence can support conviction vacation or a new trial. DNA testing has become one of the most powerful tools in post-conviction work, having led to numerous exonerations across the United States. Even if DNA testing cannot be ordered, other post-conviction relief mechanisms exist, such as motions for new trial based on newly discovered evidence or Brady motions based on withheld exculpatory evidence. An attorney experienced in post-conviction relief can evaluate whether DNA testing or other evidence-based relief mechanisms apply to your situation.
Oral arguments in appellate court are presentations to a panel of appellate judges where your attorney explains the legal issues in your case and responds to questions from the judges. Both sides typically receive limited time, often 15 to 30 minutes depending on the court and case complexity, to present their arguments and answer judicial questions. Oral arguments focus on legal issues rather than factual guilt or innocence. Judges often have already reviewed the written briefs and may ask challenging questions to understand your attorney’s position or test the strength of arguments. Oral arguments provide an opportunity to emphasize the most important arguments, clarify confusing points, and respond directly to concerns judges raise. Effective oral advocates listen carefully to judicial questions and provide thoughtful, direct answers. After oral arguments, judges take the case under advisement and issue a written opinion at a later date. While oral arguments are not always granted, they can be valuable opportunities to persuade appellate judges through direct advocacy.
Yes, sentences can be reduced on appeal in Washington through several mechanisms. If the trial court imposed a sentence that exceeded legal authority or violated sentencing statutes, the appellate court can correct this error. Additionally, Washington has changed its sentencing laws significantly in recent years, sometimes allowing sentences imposed under older law to be modified under new standards. Motions for resentencing under these law changes can be filed even years after conviction. Some appellate courts also have authority to review sentences for excessiveness, though Washington law generally gives courts wide discretion in sentencing decisions. Sentence reduction can also result from successful appeals of underlying convictions. If an appellate court reverses one or more convictions, it may order resentencing on remaining convictions, potentially resulting in lower overall sentences. Additionally, post-conviction relief such as commutation petitions or clemency requests may be available for individuals serving long sentences. An experienced appellate attorney can evaluate whether your sentence is subject to modification through appeal, post-conviction relief, or law change provisions.
Direct appeal and post-conviction relief are different legal processes with different purposes and timelines. A direct appeal challenges the conviction itself, arguing that legal errors at trial warrant reversal. Direct appeals must be filed within 30 days of sentencing and focus on issues raised in the trial record. Post-conviction relief, by contrast, addresses issues not available during direct appeal, such as ineffective assistance of counsel, newly discovered evidence, or law changes. Post-conviction relief motions can typically be filed years after conviction and direct appeal deadlines have passed. Direct appeals are the initial opportunity to challenge convictions, while post-conviction relief provides additional avenues for relief when direct appeals are unsuccessful or when new information emerges. Some cases involve both direct appeals and subsequent post-conviction relief proceedings. An experienced appellate attorney can advise you on which process best suits your situation and ensure that all available remedies are explored. The choice between or combination of direct appeal and post-conviction relief depends on the specific facts and applicable law in your case.
The cost of appellate representation varies depending on the complexity of your case, the length of the trial record, the issues involved, and the amount of legal research required. Some firms charge flat fees for appellate work, while others bill hourly. Our office can discuss fee arrangements during a confidential consultation. If you cannot afford private counsel, Washington provides public defender appellate services if you were represented by a public defender at trial. The appellate public defender’s office is separate from the trial court public defender and handles post-conviction appeals for indigent clients. We understand that cost is a significant consideration and work with clients to explain what appellate representation entails and what it will likely cost. We can sometimes negotiate payment arrangements or discuss which remedies offer the best value. We encourage you to contact us for a consultation to discuss your specific situation and how much appellate representation might cost for your case.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields