When a criminal conviction changes your life, understanding your appeal options is essential. The appeals process allows you to challenge convictions based on legal errors, insufficient evidence, or procedural violations that occurred during trial. Greene and Lloyd provides thorough representation for individuals seeking to overturn convictions or reduce sentences through appellate proceedings. Our team navigates complex procedural requirements and develops compelling arguments to present before appellate courts in Washington. Whether your case involves direct appeals, post-conviction relief petitions, or habeas corpus applications, we work diligently to identify viable grounds for relief and advocate for your rights at every stage.
Appeals provide critical opportunities to correct legal errors and protect your constitutional rights after conviction. Many convictions result from trial mistakes, ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, or newly discovered evidence that trial courts never considered. The appellate process offers an impartial review of whether proper legal procedures were followed and whether sufficient evidence supported the guilty verdict. Successful appeals can result in conviction reversals, sentence reductions, or new trials with improved representation. Without proper appellate advocacy, beneficial legal arguments remain undeveloped and potential relief goes unrealized. Our team identifies errors that may have gone unnoticed and builds strategic arguments to maximize your chances for favorable appellate outcomes.
Criminal appeals begin with filing a notice of appeal within strict time limits following sentencing or conviction. The appellate process involves thorough case review to identify legal errors, constitutional violations, or evidentiary issues that warrant appellate consideration. Your attorney develops a detailed appellate brief presenting legal arguments supported by case law, statutes, and the trial record. The court reviews written briefs from both sides before determining whether to schedule oral arguments. Oral arguments allow attorneys to address justices’ questions directly and emphasize the strongest points in your case. The appellate court then issues a written decision explaining its reasoning and whether the conviction or sentence will be affirmed, reversed, or modified.
An appeal filed immediately after conviction or sentencing challenging legal errors that occurred during trial or sentencing. Direct appeals focus on the existing trial record without introducing new evidence.
A prosecutorial breach where the state fails to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. Brady violations can support post-conviction relief if the withheld evidence was material to the verdict or sentence.
A legal claim that defense counsel’s performance fell below reasonable standards and prejudiced the outcome. These claims can be raised on direct appeal or through post-conviction petitions.
A federal remedy challenging the constitutionality of a conviction or the legality of confinement. Habeas corpus petitions are filed in federal court after state appellate remedies are exhausted.
File your notice of appeal within the strict deadline established by Washington law, typically 30 days after sentencing. Missing this deadline can permanently bar your right to appeal unless you can demonstrate excusable neglect. Contact an attorney immediately after conviction to ensure all procedural requirements are met and your appellate rights are protected.
Preserve complete copies of your trial transcript, court filings, evidence exhibits, and sentencing records for appellate review. Appellate courts rely entirely on the trial record when reviewing convictions, so completeness is essential. Request transcripts promptly from the court to avoid delays that could affect your appeal timeline.
Different post-conviction remedies address different types of errors and allow different evidence to be presented. Your situation may warrant direct appeals, post-conviction petitions, or federal habeas corpus relief—sometimes in combination. An attorney can assess which approaches are viable and develop a comprehensive strategy for your case.
When trials involve numerous errors—improper jury instructions, evidentiary rulings, prosecutorial misconduct—comprehensive appellate representation ensures all viable claims are thoroughly developed. Appellate courts consider the cumulative effect of errors when reviewing whether trials were fundamentally fair. An attorney with appellate resources can coordinate complex legal arguments and present them persuasively to appellate judges.
Constitutional violations, ineffective counsel claims, and Brady issues demand sophisticated appellate knowledge and research capabilities. These claims often involve subtle legal principles and require extensive case law analysis to succeed. Comprehensive representation ensures constitutional arguments are properly framed and supported by controlling authority.
Some cases involve obvious trial errors—improper admission of evidence, clear jury instruction mistakes, or plain sentencing errors—that are evident from the trial transcript. When appellate courts identify clear reversible error, limited appellate briefs focusing on that specific issue may suffice. However, identifying which errors are most likely to succeed still requires careful appellate analysis.
Sentencing appeals may focus narrowly on whether courts followed statutory requirements or properly applied sentencing guidelines. When sentencing arguments are straightforward and the trial itself wasn’t problematic, limited appellate briefing on sentencing issues alone might achieve results. Nevertheless, comprehensive sentencing review often identifies additional arguments worth presenting.
When trial attorneys failed to investigate defenses, present available evidence, or challenge prosecution theories, ineffective assistance claims become central to appellate efforts. Our review identifies counsel’s mistakes and develops compelling arguments for post-conviction relief based on those failures.
Newly discovered evidence—witness statements, DNA results, or exculpatory documents—that couldn’t have been discovered before trial may support post-conviction petitions. We evaluate whether new evidence would likely change the trial outcome and pursue appropriate relief.
Sentences that exceed statutory limits, fail to account for mitigating factors, or otherwise violate sentencing law are subject to appellate challenge. Our team identifies sentencing errors and argues for sentence reductions or resentencing.
Greene and Lloyd combines appellate law knowledge with a genuine commitment to obtaining relief for our clients. We understand that convictions carry profound consequences affecting your freedom, employment, family relationships, and future opportunities. Our attorneys approach each appeal with the recognition that appellate courts offer your best opportunity for vindication and relief. We conduct thorough case reviews, identify meritorious claims that may have been overlooked, and develop persuasive appellate arguments. We maintain familiarity with Washington appellate procedure, local court practices, and the judges who decide your case. Our goal is not merely to file papers—it’s to advocate effectively for your rights and pursue meaningful relief.
Choosing the right appellate attorney significantly impacts your appeal’s success. We offer personalized attention, transparent communication about your case prospects, and realistic assessments of viable arguments. We handle appeals as our primary focus, not as peripheral matters. Our team invests the research time necessary to develop strong briefs and prepare thoroughly for oral arguments. We explain appellate procedures so you understand each step and remain informed throughout the process. With Greene and Lloyd, you receive attorneys who treat your appeal with the seriousness it deserves and work tirelessly to achieve the best possible outcome.
In Washington, you must file a notice of appeal within 30 days after sentencing or entry of the judgment of conviction, unless the court extends this deadline for good cause. This deadline is strictly enforced, and missing it can result in permanent loss of your right to appeal unless you can demonstrate excusable neglect. It is critical to contact an attorney immediately after conviction to ensure your notice of appeal is filed timely. Our team ensures all procedural requirements are met and your appellate rights are preserved from the outset.
Yes. Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel can be raised on direct appeal or through post-conviction petitions under Washington law. To succeed, you must demonstrate that your attorney’s performance fell below reasonable professional standards and that this deficient performance prejudiced the outcome of your case. Examples include failure to investigate viable defenses, failure to present available evidence, unreasonable trial strategy decisions, or failure to file necessary motions. Our attorneys conduct detailed case reviews to identify whether your previous representation fell below acceptable standards and whether appellate relief is warranted.
A Brady violation occurs when prosecutors fail to disclose evidence favorable to the defense. This includes exculpatory evidence, evidence impeaching prosecution witnesses, or evidence affecting sentencing. Prosecutors have an obligation to provide such evidence regardless of whether the defense specifically requests it. If Brady violations occurred in your case, post-conviction relief may be available if the withheld evidence was material—meaning there is a reasonable probability it would have affected the verdict or sentence. We investigate whether prosecutors possessed favorable evidence they failed to disclose and pursue relief based on those violations.
A direct appeal challenges legal errors visible in the trial record without introducing new evidence. It focuses on whether trial procedures were followed correctly and whether sufficient evidence supported the conviction. Direct appeals must be filed within 30 days of sentencing. Post-conviction relief petitions allow introduction of new evidence and claims based on legal developments that occurred after trial, such as ineffective counsel claims or Brady violations. These petitions have different filing deadlines and procedures. Sometimes both direct appeals and post-conviction relief are pursued simultaneously or sequentially to maximize your chances for relief.
Yes. Federal habeas corpus relief is available in certain circumstances after state appellate remedies are exhausted. Federal courts can review whether your conviction violated federal constitutional rights, though they must generally defer to state court factual findings unless certain exceptions apply. Federal habeas corpus petitions require exhaustion of state remedies and must raise federal constitutional claims. Strict filing deadlines apply, and the process is complex. Our team evaluates whether federal habeas relief is viable in your situation and handles the necessary coordination between state and federal proceedings.
The appellate timeline varies depending on case complexity and court schedules, but typically ranges from 12 to 24 months from notice of appeal to final decision. This includes time for briefing, oral argument scheduling, and the court’s deliberation and decision-writing process. Post-conviction petitions may take longer depending on whether evidentiary hearings are required. While the process requires patience, the time investment is worthwhile when viable grounds for relief exist. Our team works efficiently within established timelines to move your appeal forward while ensuring thorough preparation and quality advocacy.
Appeal success rates depend entirely on the specific facts and legal issues in your case. We conduct comprehensive case reviews to identify viable claims and assess realistically which arguments are most likely to succeed. Some appeals present multiple strong issues with excellent prospects, while others involve more challenging legal terrain. We provide honest assessments of your situation rather than false promises. What we guarantee is thorough preparation, compelling legal arguments, and aggressive advocacy on your behalf. We identify the strongest arguments available and present them persuasively to the appellate court. Even appeals facing significant challenges deserve skilled representation to maximize any potential for relief.
Post-conviction petitions can include newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered before trial through reasonable diligence. Examples include new witness statements, DNA test results, additional documentation, or evidence of prosecutorial misconduct discovered after trial. Post-conviction proceedings also allow presentation of evidence supporting claims like ineffective assistance of counsel, which may include testimony from your trial attorney or other evidence demonstrating how counsel’s performance fell below professional standards. Depending on the claims raised, courts may order evidentiary hearings allowing live witness testimony and detailed fact development.
Release during appeal typically requires posting bond or bail while your case proceeds through the appellate system. Appellate courts can consider bail applications, though they generally apply the same bail standards as trial courts. We can file motions requesting release pending appeal based on factors like the strength of appellate issues, ties to the community, and flight risk. In certain circumstances involving newly discovered evidence or significant appellate claims, courts may release defendants pending appeal. Each situation is evaluated individually. We pursue release options available in your case while the appeal proceeds toward resolution.
If your direct appeal is unsuccessful, you retain options for post-conviction relief petitions addressing issues not fully developed on direct appeal, such as ineffective assistance claims. Post-conviction petitions offer separate opportunities for relief based on different legal theories and new evidence. If post-conviction remedies are exhausted at the state level, federal habeas corpus relief may remain available under federal law. Additionally, legal developments—such as favorable precedent from higher courts—may support motions for reconsideration. We work with you to exhaust all viable remedies before accepting a final outcome.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields