Post-Conviction Relief Advocacy
Appeals Lawyer in Central Park, Washington
Criminal Appeals and Post-Conviction Relief
If you have been convicted of a crime and believe there were legal errors during your trial or sentencing, pursuing an appeal may be a viable path forward. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we understand the complexity of the appellate process and the stakes involved in fighting for your rights. Our team handles appeals cases with meticulous attention to detail, examining trial records and identifying potential grounds for reversal or modification of your conviction. We work tirelessly to present compelling arguments to appellate courts on your behalf.
Why Criminal Appeals Matter
A criminal conviction can have devastating consequences affecting your freedom, employment, housing, and family relationships. Appeals provide an essential mechanism to challenge convictions based on legal errors, ineffective assistance of counsel, or new evidence that was unavailable at trial. By pursuing an appeal, you may be able to obtain a new trial, sentencing modification, or even complete reversal of your conviction. The appellate process serves as a critical check on the trial court system, ensuring that justice is truly served and that your constitutional rights were protected throughout your case.
Our Firm's Appeals Experience
Understanding the Appellate Process
The appellate process begins with filing a notice of appeal within a strict deadline, typically thirty days after sentencing. Our attorneys immediately begin reviewing trial records to identify potential legal errors that may serve as grounds for appeal. We examine jury instructions, evidentiary rulings, sufficiency of evidence, and trial conduct to determine whether reversible error occurred. We also investigate whether you received ineffective assistance of counsel, which is a common ground for appeal. This preliminary analysis is critical in determining whether an appeal has reasonable prospects of success.
Need More Information?
Key Terms in Criminal Appeals
Grounds for Appeal
Legal errors occurring during trial that may warrant reversal of a conviction, such as improper jury instructions, admission of inadmissible evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, or insufficient evidence of guilt.
Standard of Review
The legal standard an appellate court applies when examining trial court decisions, ranging from deferential review to de novo review, which determines how likely reversal becomes based on the type of error alleged.
Appellate Brief
A comprehensive written argument submitted to the appellate court outlining the legal errors in the trial and explaining why the conviction should be reversed or modified under applicable law.
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
A claim that your trial attorney failed to provide adequate legal representation, requiring proof that their performance was deficient and that this deficiency prejudiced your trial outcome.
PRO TIPS
Act Quickly on Appeal Deadlines
Appeal deadlines are strictly enforced by courts, and missing the deadline to file a notice of appeal can result in permanent loss of appellate rights. Contact an appeals attorney immediately after conviction to ensure all procedural requirements are met and deadlines are protected. Even if you have already missed the initial deadline, there may be alternative remedies available such as post-conviction petitions or habeas corpus relief that our firm can explore.
Preserve All Trial Issues for Appeal
Many appellate issues must be properly preserved during trial through timely objections and motions, so working with an attorney who understands appellate strategy from the beginning is crucial. Even if your trial attorney failed to preserve certain issues, some claims such as ineffective assistance of counsel can still be raised on appeal. Our attorneys conduct thorough reviews of trial records to identify both preserved and potentially available unpreserved claims that may support your appeal.
Explore Multiple Levels of Appeal
If an initial appeal to the Court of Appeals is unsuccessful, you may have options to appeal to the Washington Supreme Court or pursue federal habeas corpus relief. Different appellate courts apply different standards and may view legal issues differently. Our firm understands the strategies needed at each appellate level and can advise you on whether further appeals are viable after an initial appeal is decided.
Comprehensive vs. Limited Appeal Approaches
Benefits of Thorough Appellate Representation:
Complex Trial Records and Multiple Issues
When your trial involved numerous evidentiary rulings, jury instructions, and procedural issues, a comprehensive appellate review is essential to identify all viable grounds for reversal. An attorney who conducts a thorough analysis of the complete trial record can discover subtle legal errors that might be overlooked in a limited review. This comprehensive approach significantly increases the likelihood of identifying arguments that will persuade the appellate court.
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims
When your trial attorney may have provided inadequate representation, pursuing an ineffective assistance claim requires thorough investigation and comparison to standards of reasonable legal practice. Our firm conducts detailed analysis of your attorney’s performance and its impact on trial outcomes. These claims often provide the strongest basis for appeal and warrant comprehensive investigation and presentation.
When Focused Appeals May Be Appropriate:
Clear Legal Error on Specific Issues
When one or two clear legal errors are identifiable from the trial record with strong appellate precedent supporting reversal, a focused appeal addressing only those issues may be efficient. This approach concentrates resources on the strongest arguments rather than diluting the brief with weaker claims. However, careful analysis is still needed to determine which issues have the greatest potential for success.
Procedural Constraints and Time Limitations
In some circumstances, time constraints or procedural requirements may limit the scope of what can be addressed on appeal, making a focused approach necessary. Our firm works within these constraints while still identifying and pursuing the most promising arguments. We advise clients on realistic expectations based on the specific procedural posture of their case.
When Criminal Appeals Are Commonly Pursued
Why Choose Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd for Your Appeal
Our firm brings dedicated appellate knowledge and extensive experience handling post-conviction cases throughout Washington. We understand that your conviction and potential imprisonment affect every aspect of your life, which is why we approach every appeal with the seriousness and determination it deserves. Our attorneys combine thorough legal analysis with compelling advocacy, working to identify viable grounds for relief and present them persuasively to appellate courts. We have successfully assisted clients in obtaining reversals, new trials, and sentencing modifications.
We recognize that the appellate process is different from trial practice and requires specific skills in legal research, writing, and appellate procedure. Our team stays current with evolving appellate precedent and understands how different courts view legal issues. We provide personalized attention to each case, ensuring that your individual circumstances and concerns guide our appellate strategy. When you choose Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, you gain advocates committed to pursuing every available avenue for relief and supporting you through the appellate journey.
Schedule Your Appeals Consultation Today
People Also Search For
Post-conviction relief lawyer
Criminal appeal attorney
Washington appellate defense
Ineffective assistance of counsel
Federal habeas corpus petitions
Sentence modification appeal
New trial motion lawyer
Conviction reversal attorney
Related Services
FAQS
How long do I have to file an appeal after conviction?
You typically have thirty days from the date of sentencing to file a notice of appeal in criminal cases. This deadline is strictly enforced, and missing it can result in permanent loss of appellate rights. However, there are limited circumstances where late appeals may be allowed, such as if your attorney failed to file timely notice through no fault of your own. It is critical to contact an appeals attorney immediately after conviction to ensure all deadlines are met and your appellate rights are protected. If you have already missed the initial appeal deadline, all hope is not lost. Depending on the circumstances, you may be able to pursue post-conviction relief through petitions under Washington Criminal Procedure Rule 35 or federal habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. These remedies have different deadlines and procedural requirements that may still provide avenues for challenging your conviction. An experienced appellate attorney can evaluate whether these alternative remedies are available in your situation.
What is the difference between direct appeal and post-conviction relief?
A direct appeal challenges the conviction or sentence based on errors that appear in the trial record, such as improper jury instructions, evidentiary rulings, or insufficient evidence. Direct appeals are filed within thirty days of sentencing and proceed to the Washington Court of Appeals or Washington Supreme Court. The appellate court reviews the trial record to determine whether legal errors occurred that warrant reversal or modification of the conviction. Post-conviction relief, on the other hand, addresses issues not evident from the trial record, such as ineffective assistance of counsel, newly discovered evidence, or violations of constitutional rights. Post-conviction petitions are filed after the direct appeal process is complete and are brought under Criminal Procedure Rule 35 or through federal habeas corpus petitions. These remedies allow for more extensive factual development and investigation beyond what the trial record reveals.
Can I appeal if my trial attorney failed to preserve issues at trial?
In Washington, issues must generally be raised and properly preserved at trial through timely objections and motions to be appealed. However, there are limited exceptions to this rule. If your trial attorney failed to preserve an issue, you may still appeal based on ineffective assistance of counsel, claiming that your attorney’s failure to preserve the issue constituted inadequate representation. Additionally, some issues such as lack of subject matter jurisdiction can be raised for the first time on appeal regardless of preservation. Other exceptions exist for constitutional errors that were not preserved and newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered with reasonable diligence before trial. Our attorneys analyze your specific circumstances to determine whether unpreserved issues can be raised through available exceptions. While preserved issues are generally stronger, we identify and pursue all viable legal arguments to support your appeal.
What is ineffective assistance of counsel and how do I prove it?
Ineffective assistance of counsel is a constitutional claim that your trial attorney failed to provide adequate legal representation, established under the landmark case Strickland v. Washington. To prove this claim, you must show that your attorney’s performance was deficient and that this deficiency resulted in prejudice, meaning there is a reasonable probability that the trial outcome would have been different had your attorney performed adequately. Deficient performance includes failure to conduct adequate investigation, failure to preserve issues for appeal, or failure to present obvious defenses. Ineffective assistance claims often provide the strongest basis for appeal because they address attorney performance rather than abstract legal questions. These claims are particularly valuable when trial counsel failed to investigate evidence, cross-examine witnesses effectively, or raise obvious constitutional defenses. Our firm conducts thorough investigation of your trial counsel’s performance and prepares detailed analysis comparing their conduct to standards of reasonable legal practice in your jurisdiction.
How long does the appellate process typically take?
The appellate timeline varies depending on the complexity of your case, the court’s docket, and whether oral argument is requested. Generally, filing a direct appeal to the Washington Court of Appeals takes several months to a year from the time the notice of appeal is filed. This includes time for the trial court to prepare the appellate record, for your attorney to prepare the appellate brief, for the state to file a responding brief, and for the court to review the briefs and issue a decision. If your case is appealed to the Washington Supreme Court, the process may take additional months or even years. Federal habeas corpus cases proceed on an even longer timeline. While the process can be lengthy, working with an experienced appellate attorney helps ensure that all procedures are followed efficiently and that your case receives appropriate judicial attention. We keep clients informed about the status of their appeals and explain what to expect at each stage.
Can my conviction be overturned based on new evidence discovered after trial?
Yes, newly discovered evidence can sometimes provide grounds for appeal or post-conviction relief. If significant evidence becomes available after trial that was not previously known and could not have been discovered with reasonable diligence before trial, you may be able to obtain a new trial. This evidence must be material, meaning there is a reasonable probability that it would have changed the trial outcome. Common examples include recantations of prosecution witnesses, newly discovered alibi evidence, or exculpatory evidence that was previously hidden by prosecutors. The procedures for presenting new evidence vary depending on whether you pursue a direct appeal, post-conviction relief under Rule 35, or federal habeas corpus. Post-conviction remedies are often more appropriate for new evidence claims because they allow for actual evidentiary hearings rather than review based solely on the trial record. Our attorneys evaluate whether newly discovered evidence in your case meets the necessary standards and pursue the most effective procedural mechanism for presenting this evidence to a court.
What happens if my appeal is denied?
If your initial appeal to the Washington Court of Appeals is denied, you have options to pursue further appellate review. You can petition for discretionary review to the Washington Supreme Court, which may accept your case if it involves issues of significant public interest or constitutional importance. If the Washington Supreme Court declines to review your case, you may pursue federal habeas corpus relief in federal district court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, which allows challenges to state convictions on federal constitutional grounds. Our firm evaluates the reasons for appellate denial and advises you on whether further appeals are viable and strategically sound. Sometimes a denied appeal on one set of issues does not preclude filing post-conviction petitions raising different claims, such as ineffective assistance of counsel or newly discovered evidence. We analyze your complete case and explain all available options for continuing to seek relief from your conviction.
Can I appeal my sentence without appealing my conviction?
Yes, you can appeal your sentence without appealing your conviction through a sentencing appeal or sentencing petition. Sentencing appeals are appropriate when the sentence imposed exceeds statutory maximum penalties, violates sentencing guidelines, or was imposed in violation of constitutional requirements. For example, if your sentence was based on facts that were not proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, the sentence may be subject to reversal under recent Supreme Court precedent. Sentencing appeals can result in sentence reduction or modification while leaving the conviction intact. This approach is sometimes strategic when the conviction appears solid but the sentence seems excessive or procedurally flawed. Our attorneys review sentencing records to identify legal errors that warrant appellate correction and pursue sentencing relief independently from conviction appeals when appropriate.
How much does it cost to hire an appellate attorney?
The cost of appellate representation varies depending on whether you hire an attorney on an hourly basis or on a fixed fee basis for the appeal. Many appellate attorneys charge hourly rates ranging from $150 to $400 per hour, though rates vary based on the attorney’s experience and location. Fixed fee arrangements are common for direct appeals and typically range from $2,000 to $10,000 or more depending on case complexity. Post-conviction cases, federal habeas corpus petitions, and cases involving multiple grounds for appeal may cost significantly more. We offer transparent fee arrangements and discuss costs with clients upfront. If you cannot afford private counsel, you have the right to appointed counsel on direct appeal if you are indigent. For post-conviction relief and federal habeas corpus petitions, appointed counsel is sometimes available depending on the circumstances. We can discuss your financial situation and advise you on options for obtaining representation within your budget.
Do I have the right to an attorney for my appeal if I cannot afford one?
Yes, if you cannot afford to hire a private appellate attorney, you have the right to appointed counsel at state expense on your direct appeal to the Washington Court of Appeals. The trial court must inform you of this right, and the appellate court will appoint a public defender or conflict counsel to represent you. Appointed counsel have experience with appeals and are required to provide adequate representation. For post-conviction relief and federal habeas corpus petitions, the right to appointed counsel is more limited. These remedies do not automatically entitle you to appointed counsel, though courts may appoint counsel in some cases if you demonstrate financial need and that the issues involved are complex. Regardless of whether you have private or appointed counsel, you have the right to effective assistance and to pursue all viable grounds for relief from your conviction.