If you’ve been convicted of a crime, an appeal may offer a path to challenge the conviction or sentencing. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we represent clients throughout Lakeland North and King County who seek to overturn convictions or reduce sentences through the appellate process. Our attorneys thoroughly review trial records, identify legal errors, and build compelling arguments to present before appellate courts. Whether your case involves evidentiary issues, procedural mistakes, or ineffective assistance of counsel claims, we bring focused advocacy to every appeal.
A criminal conviction can have lasting consequences on employment, housing, and family relationships. Appeals provide a critical opportunity to correct errors that may have affected the fairness of your trial. Appellate review can result in case dismissal, new trials, reduced sentences, or valuable precedent that protects your rights. Even if conviction reversal seems unlikely, a successful appeal might secure sentence modification or preserve important legal issues for future consideration. Taking action promptly after conviction ensures you don’t miss appeal deadlines or lose critical procedural rights. Having experienced appellate counsel increases your chances of meaningful relief.
The appeal begins with filing a notice of appeal within strict statutory deadlines, typically 30 days after sentencing. We request the trial record and transcript, then conduct thorough analysis to identify potential appellate issues. These might include illegal sentences, instructional errors, evidentiary problems, or constitutional violations. We draft detailed appellate briefs presenting legal arguments supported by case law and record citations. The appellate court reviews our brief, the state’s response, and may schedule oral argument before deciding whether to affirm, reverse, or remand the conviction.
A detailed written document submitted to an appellate court arguing why a trial court’s decision was wrong and should be reversed. Appellate briefs contain legal arguments, citations to case law, and references to the trial record supporting your position.
A post-conviction relief mechanism in Washington allowing prisoners to challenge convictions or sentences based on issues not previously raised, including newly discovered evidence or claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.
The formal document filed with the trial court and appellate court within 30 days of sentencing to initiate the appellate process. Failure to file timely notice of appeal can permanently waive your right to appeal.
A claim that your trial attorney’s performance was deficient and prejudiced your defense, potentially justifying conviction reversal or a new trial under constitutional standards established by appellate courts.
Appeals are governed by strict procedural timelines that cannot be extended without compelling justification. Missing a filing deadline can permanently bar your appeal, eliminating any chance of relief through the appellate system. Contact an appeals attorney immediately after conviction to ensure all critical deadlines are preserved and your case receives prompt attention.
Appellate review depends entirely on the trial record, so it’s essential that important events were documented during trial. If the trial transcript is incomplete or unclear, we work to supplement the record with additional documentation. Early involvement of appellate counsel helps identify and address potential record problems before deadlines pass.
Strong appeals require identifying winnable legal issues from the trial record. Constitutional claims, jury instruction errors, and evidentiary rulings are common grounds for appeal. Our thorough case review identifies all viable issues to maximize your chances of appellate success and relief.
Appeals involving multiple legal claims, constitutional violations, or complicated evidentiary problems require comprehensive appellate strategy. A single trial error may be insufficient grounds for reversal, but combining several issues can create a persuasive case for relief. Our thorough analysis identifies all viable arguments and presents them effectively to appellate courts.
When substantial prison time, sex offender registration, or other serious consequences flow from conviction, full appellate representation is critical. These high-stakes situations demand meticulous record analysis and compelling advocacy before appellate judges. Comprehensive legal work increases the likelihood of meaningful relief protecting your freedom and future.
Some cases involve one identifiable legal error that likely affected the trial outcome, such as an improper jury instruction or excluded evidence. When a single issue appears dispositive, focused appellate advocacy addressing that claim may be sufficient. Our attorneys evaluate whether limited representation can adequately address your specific circumstances.
If your primary goal is reducing an allegedly excessive sentence, appellate review may focus narrowly on sentencing law and factors. Washington courts apply specific standards when reviewing sentence reasonableness, and concentrated advocacy on sentencing issues may achieve your objective. Our team determines whether sentence-focused appeals serve your best interests.
When trial evidence was weak or circumstantial, appellate courts can reverse for insufficient evidence as a matter of law. We analyze whether the prosecution presented enough credible evidence to support conviction beyond reasonable doubt.
Incorrect jury instructions or ambiguous verdicts can support appeal and conviction reversal. We identify instructional errors and argue they prejudiced your defense and warrant new trial.
If trial counsel failed to present available defenses or made serious strategic mistakes, you may pursue post-conviction relief claims. We evaluate counsel’s performance against applicable legal standards for ineffectiveness.
Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd combines seasoned trial experience with dedicated appellate practice. Our attorneys understand how trials develop and recognize what errors may provide appellate grounds for relief. We maintain strong relationships with appellate judges and court staff, positioning us to present arguments effectively. Our detailed brief writing and oral advocacy skills have resulted in successful appeals throughout Washington’s state and federal courts. We approach each appeal with the seriousness it deserves, conducting exhaustive record analysis and legal research.
Choosing the right appeals attorney dramatically affects your case outcome. We communicate clearly about realistic prospects, procedural requirements, and timeline expectations. Our transparent approach helps clients understand exactly what we’re pursuing and why. We handle appeals at every level, from direct appeals to post-conviction relief to federal habeas corpus petitions. Whether your conviction is recent or you’re pursuing relief years later, we’re prepared to fight for your appellate rights with determination and legal skill.
In Washington, you have 30 days from the date of sentencing to file a notice of appeal with the trial court. This deadline is strictly enforced, and missing it typically results in permanent loss of appellate rights. Exceptions exist in limited circumstances, such as when appointed counsel fails to file timely notice, but these are rare and require immediate legal action. If you discover an intent to appeal after the 30-day window closes, you may petition for discretionary review or pursue post-conviction relief through a personal restraint petition, which has different deadlines and requirements. Contacting an appeals attorney immediately upon conviction ensures critical deadlines are not missed.
Yes, you can appeal a guilty plea, though the grounds are more limited than appeals following trial conviction. You may appeal on issues that do not require review of the evidence, such as whether the trial court properly accepted your plea, whether your plea was knowing and voluntary, or whether certain constitutional rights were violated before accepting the plea. You cannot appeal the guilty plea itself as a basis for overturning the conviction unless you can demonstrate the plea was unknowing, involuntary, or obtained without proper advisement of rights. Claims about trial evidence or jury instructions are generally unavailable after a guilty plea, unless they involve constitutional issues affecting plea validity.
A personal restraint petition (PRP) is a post-conviction relief mechanism allowing challenge to convictions or sentences based on issues not previously raised in direct appeal, including newly discovered evidence, constitutional violations discovered after trial, or claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. PRPs are brought in the trial court, but decisions can be reviewed by appellate courts. Direct appeals challenge trial court decisions based on the existing trial record and must be filed within 30 days of sentencing. PRPs allow introduction of new evidence and claims not discoverable at trial, but typically require filing within one year of sentencing, with limited exceptions. Both are valuable appellate tools serving different purposes.
Appeals costs vary depending on case complexity, number of issues, whether oral argument is scheduled, and whether federal review is pursued. Costs typically include attorney fees for record review, legal research, brief drafting, and oral argument preparation. Some cases require supplementing the trial record or filing multiple appellate petitions, increasing expenses. We discuss costs transparently during initial consultation and work within your budget when possible. Some defendants qualify for public defender appellate representation if they cannot afford private counsel. Payment plans and arrangements may be available depending on circumstances.
Appeal success rates depend on case-specific factors, the nature of claims raised, and the trial court’s decisions. Reversals occur when appellate courts identify significant legal errors affecting trial fairness. Some appeals succeed based on single compelling issues, while others require demonstrating cumulative trial errors. Federal constitutional claims may have higher reversal potential than state law issues, and ineffective assistance claims succeed when counsel’s performance fell below professional standards. We provide honest assessment of your appeal’s prospects after thorough case review. Even when reversal seems unlikely, appeals preserve issues for future proceedings and may result in partial relief such as sentence modification or favorable precedent.
You can still appeal or seek post-conviction relief after completing your sentence in certain circumstances. If you were sentenced to probation or parole in addition to or instead of incarceration, ongoing collateral consequences support appellate jurisdiction. Additionally, collateral consequences like sex offender registration, professional license revocation, or employment restrictions justify appeal even after sentence completion. Some Washington courts have held that mootness concerns can be overcome when convictions create lasting collateral consequences. However, appeal prospects after sentence completion are more limited than during active incarceration, so timing and circumstances matter significantly.
An ineffective assistance of counsel claim asserts that your trial attorney’s performance was deficient and prejudiced your defense, meeting constitutional standards for appeal and potentially resulting in conviction reversal or new trial. Examples include counsel failing to present available defenses, missing key cross-examination opportunities, failing to file necessary motions, or providing advice that contradicted your interests. To succeed, you must demonstrate counsel’s performance was below professional norms and that there is a reasonable probability the outcome would differ with adequate representation. These claims are complex and require detailed legal analysis comparing actual trial performance to applicable standards, making experienced appellate representation essential.
Direct appeals typically take 12-24 months from notice of appeal to final decision, depending on appellate court caseload and complexity of record review. Brief filing schedules are set by appellate rules and cannot be accelerated significantly. Oral argument, if requested or granted, occurs several months after briefing concludes. Post-conviction relief proceedings vary in timeline depending on whether the trial court conducts hearings and whether decisions are appealed further. Some proceedings are resolved within months, while others take years if multiple appellate levels are involved. We manage case progression efficiently while ensuring thorough legal work.
If you cannot afford appellate counsel, you may request appointed public defender representation after conviction through the trial court. Public defenders have appellate divisions handling appeals for defendants who qualify based on financial hardship. However, public defender resources are limited, and availability may vary by jurisdiction. Many defendants benefit from private appellate counsel because private attorneys can dedicate greater resources to case analysis and argument development. We encourage consulting with both options to determine the best representation for your circumstances.
If your appeal is denied, options depend on whether you exhausted available appellate levels. If denied by the Court of Appeals, you may petition for review by the Washington Supreme Court, though the Court accepts only cases of statewide significance or involving constitutional issues. Federal habeas corpus petitions in U.S. District Court remain available for federal constitutional claims. If all appellate remedies are exhausted, you may pursue post-conviction relief if you discover new evidence or develop new legal theories. Though appeal denial is disappointing, additional legal avenues may exist depending on your specific situation and the grounds for denial.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields