A criminal conviction can feel like the end of the road, but it is not necessarily so. Appeals and post-conviction relief provide critical opportunities to challenge convictions, address legal errors, and pursue justice. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we understand the complex procedures involved in appellate proceedings and work diligently to identify issues that may warrant reversal or modification of your sentence. Whether errors occurred during trial, sentencing, or in your original plea process, we have the knowledge and resources to navigate the appellate system effectively on your behalf.
Appeals provide a vital mechanism to correct legal errors that may have affected your conviction or sentence. Many convictions contain reversible errors—procedural mistakes, evidentiary problems, or constitutional violations—that appellate courts can address. Post-conviction relief encompasses various remedies including direct appeals, motions for new trial based on newly discovered evidence, and collateral attacks on convictions. Having skilled representation during this process significantly increases the likelihood of success and gives you a meaningful opportunity to challenge an unjust outcome.
The appellate process begins with filing a notice of appeal within strict statutory timeframes, typically within thirty days of sentencing. We then obtain and review the complete trial record, including transcripts, evidence, and pleadings to identify potential issues. These might include trial court errors, prosecutorial misconduct, jury instructions problems, or sentencing errors. Our attorneys prepare comprehensive appellate briefs that present legal arguments supported by case law and statutory authority, which are then submitted to the appellate court for review.
A direct appeal is an appeal of a criminal conviction to a higher court, typically filed within thirty days of sentencing. It challenges errors that appear in the trial record and asks the appellate court to review whether legal mistakes affected the conviction or sentence. Direct appeals are a fundamental right in criminal cases and provide the first opportunity to have trial errors corrected by a higher court.
Habeas corpus is a legal remedy that challenges the legality of a person’s detention or imprisonment. In criminal cases, habeas corpus petitions are used to challenge convictions or sentences based on constitutional violations or other legal grounds that typically cannot be raised on direct appeal. This remedy provides an important safeguard against unlawful detention.
Ineffective assistance of counsel refers to substandard representation by a defense attorney that violated a defendant’s constitutional rights. To succeed on this claim, you must show that your attorney’s performance was deficient and that this deficiency likely affected the trial outcome. This is a common basis for post-conviction relief when trial counsel made significant errors.
Post-conviction relief encompasses various legal remedies available after conviction, including direct appeals, habeas corpus petitions, and motions based on newly discovered evidence. These remedies allow defendants to challenge their convictions or sentences based on grounds that may not be apparent from the trial record or that were not adequately addressed on direct appeal.
The timeline for filing an appeal is strictly limited—typically thirty days from sentencing in Washington courts. Missing this deadline can result in loss of your right to appeal. Contact an attorney immediately after conviction to ensure all deadlines are met and to begin the appellate process without delay.
Many appellable issues must be preserved at trial through proper objections and motions. If trial counsel failed to raise objections or file necessary motions, this failure itself may constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. We carefully review trial proceedings to identify all potential issues and understand how they can be raised on appeal.
Appeals are not limited to direct review of trial errors. Post-conviction relief through habeas corpus, newly discovered evidence motions, and ineffective assistance claims may provide additional paths to relief. We evaluate every potential remedy available under Washington law to maximize your chances of success.
When a conviction involves multiple trial errors, constitutional violations, or evidentiary problems, comprehensive appellate representation becomes critical. Our thorough review of trial records, combined with skilled legal analysis, identifies all viable grounds for appeal and presents them persuasively to the appellate court.
Many cases involve several potential avenues for post-conviction relief, including direct appeal issues, ineffective assistance claims, and newly discovered evidence. Comprehensive representation ensures that all viable grounds are properly developed and presented to maximize your chances of obtaining relief.
When a conviction rests primarily on one clear legal error—such as improper jury instructions or admission of inadmissible evidence—a focused appellate strategy addressing that specific issue may be sufficient. Our team determines whether a targeted approach will be effective for your case.
Some cases involve sentencing errors that can be addressed through a direct appeal focused on sentencing issues. When the conviction itself is solid but the sentence exceeds legal limits or fails to comply with statutory requirements, a focused sentencing appeal may be the appropriate strategy.
When you proceed to trial and are convicted, direct appeal of trial errors becomes the primary remedy. We review all trial proceedings to identify legal mistakes that may warrant reversal or a new trial.
If your sentence exceeds legal limits or violates sentencing guidelines, an appeal focused on sentencing issues can result in sentence reduction. We challenge sentences that lack adequate legal support or constitutional justification.
When significant evidence emerges after conviction that was not available at trial, post-conviction motions based on newly discovered evidence may provide grounds for a new trial. We investigate whether newly discovered evidence could change the trial outcome.
Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd has represented numerous clients through the appellate process, securing reversals, sentence reductions, and post-conviction relief. Our attorneys understand appellate procedure, relevant case law, and the judicial preferences of Washington appellate courts. We combine meticulous legal analysis with persuasive advocacy to present the strongest possible arguments on your behalf. Your case receives dedicated attention from attorneys who are committed to pursuing every viable avenue for relief.
Appealing a conviction requires different skills than trial advocacy. Our appellate experience means we know how to identify reversible errors, present legal arguments effectively in writing and orally, and navigate the strict procedural requirements of appellate practice. We handle every stage of the appellate process with care and professionalism, from preparing appellate briefs to presenting oral arguments before appellate judges. Contact us today to discuss your case and learn how we can help restore justice.
A direct appeal challenges the conviction or sentence based on errors that appear in the trial record. It must be filed within thirty days of sentencing and focuses on legal mistakes made during trial. Post-conviction relief, by contrast, includes various remedies filed after direct appeal deadlines have passed, such as habeas corpus petitions, motions based on newly discovered evidence, and ineffective assistance of counsel claims. These remedies address issues that may not be apparent from the trial record or that were not adequately developed on direct appeal. Direct appeals are limited to reviewing what happened at trial, while post-conviction relief can consider matters outside the trial record. Both are important mechanisms for seeking justice, and the appropriate remedy depends on the specific facts and circumstances of your case. Our attorneys evaluate all available options to determine which remedies offer the greatest potential for success.
In Washington, you generally have thirty days from sentencing to file a notice of appeal. This deadline is strictly enforced, and missing it can result in loss of your appellate rights. However, there are limited exceptions for cases involving newly discovered evidence or claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, which may be raised through post-conviction relief even after direct appeal deadlines have passed. It is critical to contact an attorney immediately after conviction to ensure all deadlines are met and to begin the appellate process without delay. Our firm monitors all applicable deadlines and takes swift action to protect your rights.
Numerous grounds can support an appeal, including trial court errors, prosecutorial misconduct, jury instruction problems, improper admission or exclusion of evidence, insufficient evidence to support the conviction, sentencing errors, and constitutional violations. Each ground requires specific legal analysis and must be supported by the trial record and applicable case law. We thoroughly review all aspects of your trial to identify every potential ground for appeal. Some grounds, such as trial errors, must have been preserved through proper objections at trial to be raised on appeal. Other grounds, such as ineffective assistance of counsel, can be raised for the first time on post-conviction relief. Our comprehensive analysis ensures that no viable ground is overlooked.
Yes, you can appeal a conviction even if you entered a guilty plea, but the grounds are more limited. Appeals of guilty pleas typically challenge the validity of the plea itself, such as claims that the plea was not knowing and voluntary, that you were denied effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations, or that the trial court failed to comply with required procedures. We can evaluate whether your guilty plea provides grounds for appeal or post-conviction relief. Ineffective assistance of counsel claims are particularly important in guilty plea cases, as they can challenge whether your attorney adequately advised you of the consequences of the plea or negotiated the best possible outcome. Our attorneys carefully review the circumstances of your plea to determine if relief is available.
Ineffective assistance of counsel means your trial attorney’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that this deficiency likely affected the trial outcome. Examples include failure to investigate the case, failure to present available evidence, failure to raise applicable legal defenses, or failure to cross-examine witnesses effectively. To succeed on this claim, you must demonstrate both that your attorney’s performance was deficient and that the deficiency prejudiced your case. This is one of the most important grounds for post-conviction relief and can be raised through post-conviction motions or habeas corpus petitions. Our attorneys have significant experience pursuing ineffective assistance claims and understand the standards courts apply in evaluating these claims.
The timeline for appellate proceedings varies depending on the complexity of your case and which appellate court is involved. Direct appeals typically take six months to two years from filing the notice of appeal to decision. During this time, the appellate court reviews the trial record, considers the parties’ written briefs, and may hear oral arguments. Post-conviction relief proceedings may take longer, particularly if they involve fact-finding or multiple levels of review. While the process requires patience, the potential benefits of reversal or sentence reduction make it well worth pursuing. Our attorneys keep clients informed of progress throughout the appellate process and manage all procedural aspects to move the case as efficiently as possible.
Newly discovered evidence can provide grounds for post-conviction relief if it is material, credible, and could have changed the trial outcome. The evidence must not have been available at trial through the exercise of due diligence. Common examples include witness statements, physical evidence, DNA results, or documentation that contradicts evidence presented at trial. We investigate whether newly discovered evidence exists and whether it meets the legal requirements for post-conviction relief. Motions based on newly discovered evidence can result in a new trial or, in some cases, reversal of the conviction. These motions can be filed even after direct appeal deadlines have passed, making them an important remedy when new evidence emerges.
Habeas corpus is a legal remedy that challenges the legality of your detention or imprisonment based on constitutional violations or other serious legal defects. In criminal cases, habeas corpus petitions can challenge convictions that violated fundamental constitutional rights, such as violations of due process, ineffective assistance of counsel, or prosecutorial misconduct. Habeas corpus is a broader remedy than direct appeal and can address issues that might not appear in the trial record. Habeas corpus petitions can be filed in state or federal court and provide an important safeguard against unlawful convictions. Our attorneys are experienced in preparing and litigating habeas corpus petitions to protect your constitutional rights.
Yes, you can appeal a sentence without appealing the conviction itself. Sentencing appeals challenge the sentence as excessive, improper, or in violation of sentencing guidelines or statutory requirements. This is useful when the conviction is solid but the sentence exceeds legal limits or lacks adequate legal justification. Sentencing appeals are often more straightforward than conviction appeals and can result in sentence reduction. Our attorneys evaluate whether sentencing appeals are appropriate for your case and prepare compelling arguments for sentence reduction based on applicable law and sentencing principles.
The chances of success on appeal depend on many factors, including the strength of the legal errors you are challenging, the appellate court’s interpretation of applicable law, and the quality of legal advocacy. While reversals are never guaranteed, identifying and presenting strong legal arguments significantly increases the likelihood of obtaining relief. Our thorough case analysis and skilled advocacy give you the best possible chance of success. Even when direct appeals do not result in reversal, post-conviction relief may provide additional opportunities for relief. We evaluate all viable avenues and pursue those that offer the greatest potential for achieving a favorable outcome.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields