If you have been convicted of a crime and believe there were legal errors in your trial, an appeal offers an opportunity to challenge that conviction. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we provide comprehensive appellate representation for individuals in Woodinville and throughout King County. Our attorneys thoroughly review trial records, identify potential errors, and present compelling arguments before appellate courts to seek reversal or modification of sentences.
Appeals provide a critical mechanism to address trial errors that may have affected your conviction or sentence. Appellate courts review whether proper legal procedures were followed and whether sufficient evidence supported the verdict. Successful appeals can result in conviction reversal, new trials, or sentence reduction. Having an attorney who understands appellate standards and can identify viable legal issues significantly improves your chances of obtaining relief. Our team recognizes how important this process is to your future.
A criminal appeal challenges the legality of a conviction or sentence. Unlike trials, which focus on determining guilt or innocence, appeals examine whether legal procedures were properly followed and whether errors occurred that affected the outcome. Appellate courts do not retry cases or hear new evidence; instead, they review the trial record for legal mistakes. Common issues on appeal include improper jury instructions, admission of inadmissible evidence, ineffective counsel, and constitutional violations. Appellate attorneys must identify these issues and present them in written briefs and oral arguments before judges.
A higher court that reviews decisions made by trial courts to determine whether legal errors occurred. Appellate courts examine trial records but do not conduct new trials or hear new evidence.
A legal mistake that occurred during trial but did not affect the outcome sufficiently to warrant reversal of the conviction or sentence.
A formal document filed with the trial court and appellate court that initiates the appeal process and must be filed within specified timeframes.
A legal mistake or procedural violation that was significant enough to likely affect the trial outcome and may result in reversal or a new trial.
During your trial, your attorney should make objections and create a clear record of any legal errors for appellate review. Failing to object at trial can waive your right to appeal certain issues. Contact an appellate attorney immediately after conviction to ensure all necessary notices and filings are completed within strict deadlines.
Different legal issues are reviewed under different standards, which affect how appellate courts evaluate them. Some rulings receive deferential review, while others receive stricter scrutiny. Understanding which standard applies to your issues helps determine your realistic chances of success on appeal.
Appellate courts primarily consider issues that were properly raised and objected to at trial. Issues not preserved during trial are generally waived unless they involve constitutional violations or plain error. Our attorneys identify which issues were properly preserved and most likely to succeed on appeal.
Cases with lengthy trial transcripts, multiple witnesses, and complex legal issues require careful analysis to identify viable appellate arguments. Thorough appellate representation ensures all potential issues are examined and presented effectively. Without comprehensive review, meritorious claims may be overlooked or inadequately argued.
When constitutional rights were violated or serious legal errors occurred, comprehensive appellate representation is essential to present these issues persuasively. Appellate courts pay particular attention to constitutional claims, and strong advocacy can increase success rates. Experienced appellate attorneys know how to frame these arguments to maximize impact before appellate judges.
Some cases involve one clear legal error that substantially affected the outcome. When a specific issue is strong and well-documented in the trial record, focusing appellate arguments on that issue can be effective. A focused strategy allows concentrated effort on the most promising claim.
If the conviction is not being challenged but only the sentence, appellate review may focus solely on whether sentencing procedures were proper or whether the sentence was unreasonable. Sentencing appeals can sometimes be resolved with targeted arguments about sentence length or conditions.
If conviction rested on weak or circumstantial evidence, appellate courts may reverse if the evidence did not meet reasonable doubt standards. Our attorneys analyze whether sufficient evidence supported guilty verdicts.
When juries received incorrect legal instructions or prejudicial evidence was admitted, these errors may provide grounds for appeal and potential reversal. We identify and argue these procedural violations before appellate courts.
Sentences that are disproportionate to the offense or deviate significantly from sentencing guidelines may be challenged on appeal. We advocate for reasonable sentences based on established legal principles and your individual circumstances.
At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we understand that your conviction affects every aspect of your life. We approach appellate cases with dedication and thorough legal analysis. Our attorneys have handled numerous criminal appeals and understand what appellate judges look for in written briefs and oral arguments. We bring strong research skills, compelling writing, and persuasive advocacy to your case. Your appeal deserves representation from attorneys who take it seriously.
We believe in fighting for our clients’ rights at every stage. We thoroughly review trial records, research applicable law, and develop appellate strategies tailored to your specific case. Our team maintains professional relationships with appellate courts and understands local practices and preferences. We communicate regularly with clients about case progress and appellate options. Contact us today to discuss your appeal.
In Washington, notice of appeal must typically be filed within thirty days of sentencing or entry of judgment. This deadline is strict, and missing it can result in loss of your appellate rights unless exceptional circumstances exist. It is crucial to contact an appellate attorney immediately following conviction to ensure deadlines are met. Additionally, some issues may require filing a motion for reconsideration or other preliminary motions before filing notice of appeal. The appellate process includes additional deadlines for filing briefs and other documents. Our attorneys ensure all procedural deadlines are tracked and met to preserve your appellate rights.
Appellate courts do not conduct new trials. Instead, they review whether legal errors occurred during your original trial that affected the outcome. If the appellate court finds reversible error, it may remand your case back to the trial court for a new trial, but this is not automatic. The appellate court’s decision depends on the nature of the error and its impact on the verdict. Some errors may result in reversal without a new trial, sentence modification, or other relief. Our attorneys present the strongest possible arguments for the relief you seek based on the facts and law in your case.
Oral argument allows attorneys to present case arguments directly to appellate judges and respond to their questions. Typically, each side receives limited time (often fifteen to thirty minutes) to discuss the issues and answer judicial questions. Judges use oral argument to probe weak points in legal arguments and clarify complex issues. Oral argument preparation is essential. Our attorneys prepare thoroughly by anticipating likely questions, researching judicial opinions, and practicing responses. Effective oral advocacy can significantly influence appellate decisions and demonstrate the strength of your case to the court.
Yes. If you cannot afford an appellate attorney, you may request appointment of a public defender or appellate public advocate to handle your appeal. You must demonstrate financial hardship to qualify for appointed counsel. Public defenders handle many appeals and have experience with appellate procedures. However, if you have any financial resources, courts may require you to contribute toward legal representation. If you believe appointed counsel may be inadequate for your situation, you have options to seek private representation. Contact us to discuss your specific circumstances and available options.
Ineffective assistance of counsel occurs when your trial attorney performed so poorly that the representation fell below objective standards of reasonableness. This might include failing to object to obvious errors, missing deadlines, or failing to pursue viable legal claims. To succeed on this claim, you must show deficient performance and that it prejudiced your case outcome. Ineffective assistance claims can be raised on direct appeal or through post-conviction motions. If your trial attorney failed to preserve issues for appeal or missed apparent errors, we can evaluate whether you have a viable ineffective assistance claim. These claims require careful legal analysis and skilled advocacy.
The appellate process typically takes six months to two years, depending on court backlogs, case complexity, and whether oral argument is requested. After notice of appeal is filed, you must prepare and file an appellate brief outlining your arguments. The prosecution files a response brief, and you may file a reply brief. After briefing is complete, the appellate court schedules oral argument or issues a decision based on written briefs. Decisions can take weeks or months after oral argument. Our attorneys monitor your case timeline and maintain communication with you about expected deadlines and developments.
Various legal errors can be raised on appeal, including improper jury instructions, admission of inadmissible evidence, constitutional violations, insufficient evidence to support conviction, and sentencing errors. Issues must typically have been objected to at trial to be raised on appeal, unless they involve constitutional violations or plain errors affecting fairness. Our attorneys thoroughly review trial records to identify all potential appellate issues. We analyze which issues are strongest and most likely to succeed before appellate judges. Strategic issue selection focuses appellate arguments on the most promising claims for obtaining relief.
Yes. You can pursue a sentence appeal without challenging the conviction itself. Sentencing appeals focus on whether the trial court followed proper procedures, considered appropriate factors, or imposed unreasonable sentences under established guidelines. Appellate courts review sentences for legal error and sometimes for abuse of discretion. Sentencing appeals may succeed when sentences are disproportionate to similar offenses, deviate significantly from guidelines, or were based on improper considerations. If you believe your sentence was excessive or imposed improperly, we can evaluate sentencing appeal options even if the underlying conviction appears solid.
Habeas corpus petitions challenge the legality of detention or confinement. Criminal defendants may file habeas petitions raising constitutional claims or asserting they are being held illegally. Federal habeas corpus petitions can challenge state convictions based on federal constitutional violations that were not adequately addressed on state appeal. Habeas petitions involve complex procedural rules and exhaustion requirements. Federal habeas is available only after state appellate remedies are exhausted. Our attorneys can evaluate whether habeas relief is available in your case and pursue this remedy when appropriate to challenge your conviction or sentence.
Direct appeal challenges legal errors that appear in the trial record. Post-conviction relief (such as personal restraint petitions or habeas corpus petitions) can raise issues not apparent in the trial record, such as ineffective assistance of counsel, newly discovered evidence, or changed law. Direct appeals must be filed promptly, while post-conviction motions may be filed later. Both remedy types are important. Direct appeal focuses appellate courts on trial errors, while post-conviction relief addresses claims that require evidence or arguments outside the trial record. Our attorneys can advise which remedies apply to your situation and develop comprehensive appellate strategies.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields