If you have been convicted of a crime and believe there were errors in your trial, an appeal may provide an opportunity to challenge that conviction. The appeals process is complex and requires thorough legal analysis of court records, trial transcripts, and applicable law. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we represent clients throughout Washington who are pursuing appellate relief. Our attorneys review cases carefully to identify potential grounds for appeal and develop effective strategies to present before appellate courts.
An appeal is fundamentally different from a trial. Rather than presenting new evidence or calling witnesses, appellate courts review whether legal errors occurred that affected your case’s outcome. Having an attorney who understands appellate procedure and strategy is essential. Appellate courts consider issues such as improper jury instructions, evidentiary rulings, prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel, and constitutional violations. Without proper representation, critical arguments may be waived or inadequately presented. Our attorneys bring knowledge of appellate standards of review and skill in crafting persuasive written and oral arguments on your behalf.
A criminal appeal begins with filing a notice of appeal within the required timeframe after sentencing or conviction. In Washington, direct appeals of felony convictions go to the Court of Appeals, with the possibility of further appeal to the Washington Supreme Court. The appellate process involves reviewing the trial record, identifying legal errors, researching applicable case law, and preparing a written brief that explains the errors and why they warrant reversal or modification of the conviction. Oral arguments may also be presented before a panel of judges.
A direct appeal is the first appellate review of a criminal conviction, where the appellate court examines the trial record to determine whether legal errors occurred that affected the outcome. It must be filed within strict deadlines after sentencing.
The standard of review is the legal test that appellate courts apply when evaluating claims of error. Different issues receive different levels of scrutiny, such as de novo review for legal conclusions or abuse of discretion for trial court decisions.
Ineffective assistance of counsel claims challenge a trial attorney’s performance, arguing that the representation fell below an acceptable standard and resulted in prejudice to the defendant’s case outcome.
Post-conviction relief proceedings allow defendants to challenge convictions after direct appeals are exhausted, typically based on newly discovered evidence, constitutional violations, or other grounds not available during the initial appeal.
To pursue an appeal, legal errors must generally be objected to and placed on the record during trial. If issues are not raised at trial, they may be waived for appellate review. Work with your trial attorney to ensure that all potential errors are properly preserved through timely objections and motions. This foundation is essential for any subsequent appellate challenges you may wish to pursue.
Criminal appeals are governed by strict procedural deadlines that cannot be extended without good cause. The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of sentencing in most cases. Missing these deadlines can permanently waive your right to appeal. Contact an appellate attorney immediately after conviction or sentencing to ensure all critical deadlines are met and your appellate rights are preserved.
If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be entitled to a court-appointed appellate representative at no cost. This public defender or assigned counsel will handle your appeal on your behalf. If you wish to retain private counsel instead, you have that option. Either way, securing appellate representation promptly is crucial to protecting your rights and pursuing all available relief.
When a trial involves numerous potential legal errors—such as improper evidentiary rulings, jury instruction issues, prosecutorial misconduct, or constitutional violations—comprehensive appellate representation is necessary to research all issues thoroughly and present them persuasively. An attorney who conducts complete record review and exhaustive legal research can identify all viable grounds for appeal and develop a cohesive appellate strategy. This thorough approach maximizes the chances of success before appellate courts.
Appeals involving federal constitutional issues require sophisticated legal analysis and knowledge of relevant Supreme Court precedent and appellate standards. Constitutional claims often require extensive briefing and careful framing to succeed on appeal. Comprehensive representation ensures these critical arguments are presented with precision and supported by authoritative legal authority. Cases involving constitutional violations benefit significantly from an attorney’s depth of knowledge in this specialized appellate area.
Some cases present one clear, identifiable legal error that alone warrants reversal or modification—such as an erroneous ruling on a critical motion or a significant evidentiary mistake. When a single issue is strong and likely to persuade the appellate court, a focused appeal strategy concentrating on that issue can be effective. This streamlined approach can be efficient while still presenting a compelling case for relief.
Procedural defects, such as improper notice or jurisdictional issues, sometimes present straightforward grounds for appeal that do not require extensive legal analysis. When the trial court clearly lacked authority or failed to follow required procedures, a limited appellate challenge can effectively address the problem. These cases may resolve through focused briefing on the procedural issue without need for comprehensive appellate investigation.
When a conviction rests on insufficient evidence that does not meet the legal standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, appellate review can challenge the conviction’s validity. Our attorneys analyze whether the prosecution presented adequate evidence to support each element of the crime charged.
If your trial attorney failed to investigate adequately, present defenses, or object to errors, ineffective assistance of counsel claims can be pursued on appeal. We evaluate whether your representation fell below professional standards and caused prejudice.
Sentences that violate sentencing guidelines, include improper conditions, or are excessively harsh may be appealed. Our attorneys challenge sentencing decisions that do not comply with applicable law or legal standards.
Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd offers dedicated appellate representation to clients throughout Centralia and Lewis County. Our attorneys understand Washington appellate procedure and have handled cases in state and federal courts. We provide thorough record review, comprehensive legal research, and persuasive written and oral advocacy. When you work with us, you receive individualized attention and strategic guidance tailored to your specific appellate issues. We explain the process clearly and keep you informed at every stage.
We are committed to protecting your appellate rights and pursuing every legitimate avenue for relief. Whether your case involves issues of trial error, constitutional violations, sentencing concerns, or post-conviction relief, we bring knowledge and advocacy skills to bear on your behalf. Our goal is to achieve the best possible outcome through thorough, professional representation. We understand the importance of your case and work diligently to present compelling arguments before appellate courts. Contact us to discuss your appellate options.
In Washington, a notice of appeal must generally be filed within 30 days of sentencing for a felony conviction. However, certain circumstances may allow extensions or different deadlines. If you miss this deadline without good cause, you may permanently lose your right to appeal. Immediately contact an appellate attorney if you are considering an appeal to ensure all critical deadlines are met and your rights are preserved. For post-conviction relief and other collateral proceedings, different timelines apply. An attorney can advise you on the specific deadlines that apply to your case. Missing appellate deadlines is a serious matter that can foreclose relief, so prompt action is essential to protect your interests.
A direct appeal reviews whether legal errors occurred during trial that affected the conviction or sentence. It is filed after conviction and must be completed within a defined timeline. Direct appeals examine the existing trial record without presenting new evidence. Post-conviction relief, by contrast, includes proceedings such as motions for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence or petitions challenging the conviction based on grounds that could not be raised on direct appeal, such as ineffective assistance of counsel. Both types of appeals serve important functions. Direct appeals address trial errors that should have been preserved on the record. Post-conviction relief allows challenges based on facts or legal theories that emerged after trial. An attorney can advise which appellate mechanisms are appropriate for your situation.
Yes, you generally can appeal your conviction even if you entered a plea agreement. While the grounds for appeal may be more limited than in cases that went to trial, appellate issues can still exist. For example, you can challenge whether the trial court properly accepted your plea or whether the sentence violates legal requirements. You can also raise issues about ineffective assistance of counsel in the plea process. However, by entering a guilty plea, you typically waive certain trial-related issues. Your attorney will review your specific plea agreement and the circumstances to determine what appellate claims are available. Some agreements explicitly waive appeal rights, so the terms of your particular plea deal affect what can be appealed. Discuss your options with an appellate attorney to understand what grounds for relief may still be available.
Criminal appeals can raise various legal errors that occurred during trial or sentencing. These include improper jury instructions, evidentiary rulings that excluded important defense evidence or admitted prejudicial prosecution evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel, constitutional violations, and sentencing errors. Appellate courts also review whether sufficient evidence supported the conviction and whether proper procedures were followed throughout the case. However, not every trial error warrants reversal—appellate courts apply different standards depending on the type of error and whether proper objections were made at trial. To raise an issue on appeal, it generally must have been objected to or preserved in the trial record. If an issue was not raised at trial, it may be waived unless there are exceptional circumstances. An appellate attorney will review your trial record carefully to identify all potential errors and determine which claims have the strongest chance of success on appeal.
The cost of appellate representation varies depending on the complexity of the case, the issues involved, and the extent of work required. Some attorneys charge hourly rates, while others may offer flat fees for certain appellate services such as direct appeals. Factors affecting cost include the length of the trial transcript, the number of issues to research and brief, and whether oral arguments are expected. If you cannot afford an attorney, you have the right to court-appointed appellate counsel at no cost. Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd can discuss fee arrangements with you and explain what services are included. We work with clients to understand costs upfront and provide transparent billing. Contact us to obtain information about representation fees and to discuss payment options that may be available.
Oral arguments are presentations before a panel of appellate judges where each side’s attorney briefly explains their legal position and responds to judicial questions. Not all appellate cases include oral arguments; some are decided based on the written briefs alone. When oral arguments do occur, they are typically limited to 15 or 20 minutes per side. The attorney presents the main arguments and the judges ask questions to clarify legal issues or challenge the advocate’s position. Oral arguments provide an opportunity to emphasize key points and directly address the court’s concerns. Preparing for oral arguments requires thorough knowledge of the case record and applicable law. Your appellate attorney will prepare you on what to expect and may conduct practice arguments beforehand. Even if you do not personally attend oral arguments, your attorney’s performance in presenting arguments before the court significantly influences the appellate outcome.
Yes, in many cases you can appeal your sentence separately from your conviction. Sentencing appeals challenge whether the sentence complies with applicable laws and guidelines, whether the trial court properly considered sentencing factors, or whether the sentence is excessive. A sentencing appeal does not require proving the conviction itself was wrong—it focuses on whether the sentence imposed was legally proper and appropriate. This is beneficial when the conviction may be sound but the sentence concerns you. Sentencing appeals can address issues such as sentences that exceed guideline ranges, unlawful conditions of release, or sentencing decisions that violate statutory requirements. If you believe your sentence is improper or too harsh, discuss sentencing appeal options with an attorney. These appeals present a focused way to challenge sentencing decisions without reopening trial issues.
Ineffective assistance of counsel occurs when your trial attorney’s performance fell below an acceptable professional standard and caused prejudice to your case. Examples include failure to investigate adequately, failure to present available defenses, failure to file necessary motions, mishandling of evidence, or poor strategic choices. To succeed on an ineffective assistance claim, you must show that your attorney’s performance was deficient and that the deficiency caused a reasonable probability of a different trial outcome. These claims are typically raised in post-conviction proceedings rather than direct appeals. Ineffective assistance claims require careful legal analysis and often involve comparing your trial attorney’s actions to professional standards. If you believe your trial representation was inadequate, discuss this concern with an appellate attorney who can evaluate whether viable ineffective assistance claims exist in your case.
The timeline for a criminal appeal depends on several factors, including court caseload, the complexity of the issues, and whether extensions are granted. A direct appeal in the Washington Court of Appeals typically takes 12 to 18 months from filing the notice of appeal to decision. If the case proceeds to the Washington Supreme Court, additional time is required for review and decision. Post-conviction proceedings may take longer, particularly if fact-finding hearings are necessary. Some appeals resolve more quickly, while others may take longer depending on circumstances. During the appellate process, your attorney handles all filings, research, and advocacy. You will be informed of significant developments and given opportunities to provide input. While the process requires patience, maintaining strong attorney communication helps you understand progress throughout the appeal.
The chances of success on a criminal appeal depend on the specific legal issues, the strength of the arguments, and applicable appellate standards. Different types of errors have different success rates. For example, appellate courts are more likely to reverse convictions based on constitutional violations or insufficient evidence than on other types of trial errors. The strength of your particular claim depends on detailed legal analysis of your case record and applicable precedent. Your appellate attorney will candidly assess which issues have the strongest prospects for success. Not all appeals succeed, and appellate courts affirm many convictions. However, even when full reversal is unlikely, appeals can result in modification of sentences, remands for resentencing, or other favorable relief. An experienced appellate attorney will advise you realistically about your case’s prospects and explain the likely outcomes of pursuing different claims.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields