Product liability cases arise when defective or dangerous products cause injury to consumers. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we represent Maplewood residents who have been harmed by unsafe products, including defective manufacturing, inadequate warnings, or poor design. Our team understands the complexities involved in establishing liability and holds manufacturers, distributors, and retailers accountable for placing dangerous items in the marketplace. We work diligently to secure compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and ongoing treatment costs resulting from product-related injuries.
Product liability claims serve as an important mechanism for holding manufacturers accountable and protecting public safety. When companies know they may face legal consequences, they invest more resources in product safety testing and quality control. These cases help remove dangerous items from circulation and encourage industry-wide improvements. For injured individuals, pursuing a claim provides access to compensation that covers medical bills, rehabilitation, and other expenses that result from product defects. Beyond financial recovery, successful claims send a message that consumer safety matters and that companies must take responsibility for the products they create and distribute.
Product liability law holds manufacturers, distributors, and sellers responsible when their products cause injury due to defects or unsafe conditions. There are three primary theories of liability: manufacturing defects occur when a product is made incorrectly or contains flawed materials; design defects exist when a product’s design is inherently unsafe even if manufactured correctly; and failure to warn occurs when a company does not provide adequate instructions or safety warnings. Proving liability requires demonstrating that the defect existed when the product left the manufacturer’s control and that the defect was the direct cause of your injuries. Understanding which theory applies to your situation is essential for building a strong claim.
A manufacturing defect occurs when a product deviates from its intended design due to errors in production, material failure, or assembly mistakes. Even if a product’s design is safe, defects in the manufacturing process can create dangerous conditions. Examples include structural weaknesses, contamination, or improper assembly that would not occur in a properly manufactured unit.
Strict liability means a manufacturer can be held responsible for injuries caused by defective products regardless of whether the company was negligent or acted carefully. The injured party needs only to prove the defect existed and caused harm, not that the company was careless or intentionally wrongful.
A design defect exists when a product’s design is inherently unsafe, even if manufactured according to specifications. This means the entire product line poses risks because of how it was engineered or conceived, rather than individual units being flawed.
Failure to warn refers to a company’s negligence in providing adequate safety instructions, warnings, or precautions about product risks. Even safe products can become dangerous without proper guidance, and manufacturers must inform consumers of potential hazards.
Preserve the defective product and take photographs of the damage from multiple angles before any changes occur. Keep all receipts, packaging materials, instruction manuals, and warranty information that came with the product. Document your medical treatment, injuries, and any communications with the manufacturer regarding the defect, as this evidence becomes crucial for your claim.
Visit a doctor or emergency room immediately following your product-related injury and inform them exactly how the injury occurred. Medical records establish the connection between the defective product and your injuries, which is essential for your case. Delayed treatment can be used against you by insurance companies claiming the injury was not serious or was caused by something else.
Reach out to Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd as soon as you recognize that a product defect caused your injury. Early involvement allows us to preserve evidence, identify liable parties, and advise you on protecting your rights. Waiting too long can result in lost evidence, faded memories, and potential statute of limitations issues that bar your claim.
When product injuries result in significant ongoing medical needs, permanent disability, or substantial lost earnings, comprehensive legal representation becomes essential. These cases involve complex damage calculations, lifetime care projections, and vocational assessments that require thorough investigation. Our firm pursues maximum compensation by documenting all current and future impacts on your life.
When a defect affects numerous products or has injured multiple consumers, comprehensive representation helps establish patterns of negligence. We investigate whether the manufacturer knew about defects and failed to issue recalls or warnings. These broader cases often result in larger settlements and send important messages about accountability.
When injuries are minor and the defect is obvious, straightforward claims may be resolved through direct negotiation with manufacturers or their insurance companies. These cases typically involve smaller medical bills and limited ongoing treatment needs. However, even seemingly minor injuries may have hidden complications, so professional evaluation remains important.
Product defects causing minimal injuries or limited property damage may be addressed through small claims court or direct settlement discussions. These cases typically do not require the extensive investigation and expert testimony needed for serious injury claims. Still, understanding your legal rights through consultation with an attorney helps ensure you receive fair compensation.
Kitchen appliances, power tools, and electronic devices that malfunction or fail can cause burns, cuts, electrocution, or other serious injuries. Manufacturers must ensure safe operation and provide adequate warnings about potential hazards.
Defective brakes, steering systems, seat belts, or airbags significantly increase crash severity and injury risk. Vehicle manufacturers face strict liability for safety-related component failures that lead to accidents and injuries.
Products contaminated with harmful substances or containing dangerous components intended for other purposes can cause serious illness or injury. Companies must maintain quality control and ensure products are safe for their intended use.
Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd has represented Maplewood residents in personal injury matters for years, building strong relationships with our community and developing deep knowledge of Washington’s legal system. We understand the unique circumstances affecting Pierce County families and the economic challenges that product injuries create. Our firm maintains the resources necessary to investigate thoroughly, retain qualified experts, and take cases to trial when manufacturers refuse fair settlements. We handle all aspects of your case, from initial investigation through final resolution.
We believe in direct communication with our clients, keeping you informed about your case’s progress and explaining all available options. We work on contingency, meaning you pay no fees unless we recover compensation for you. This arrangement aligns our interests with yours and ensures we remain motivated to secure the best possible outcome. Our commitment to Maplewood and surrounding areas reflects our dedication to helping injured individuals and families rebuild their lives after product-related harm.
To succeed in a product liability claim, you must demonstrate that a defect existed in the product, that the defect caused your injury, and that you used the product as intended or in a reasonably foreseeable manner. The specific elements vary depending on whether you pursue a manufacturing defect, design defect, or failure to warn claim. For manufacturing defects, you show the product deviated from its intended design. For design defects, you prove the design itself was unreasonably dangerous. For failure to warn, you establish that adequate warnings were absent and would have prevented your injury. Under Washington’s strict liability standard, you do not need to prove the manufacturer was careless or negligent. This standard makes recovery more accessible for injured consumers. However, you must provide evidence linking the defect directly to your injuries. Our attorneys work with medical professionals and technical experts to establish these connections clearly and convincingly.
Washington has a three-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including product liability cases. This means you have three years from the date of your injury to file a lawsuit. However, waiting until the deadline approaches is unwise because evidence can be lost, witnesses’ memories fade, and the defective product may be discarded or destroyed. We recommend contacting our office as soon as possible after a product-related injury. Certain circumstances can extend or shorten the limitation period. For example, if the injury involves a minor, the clock may not start until they reach adulthood. If a manufacturer fraudulently conceals the defect, additional time may be available. These exceptions are complex, making early consultation with an attorney essential to protect your rights.
You can pursue claims against the manufacturer, distributor, retailer, or any company in the product’s supply chain. Washington law holds all parties in the chain responsible for defective products that cause injury. This means you might sue the manufacturer for designing or producing a defective item, the distributor for failing to discover the defect, or the retailer for selling it. In many cases, we name multiple defendants to ensure that those responsible for your injuries contribute to compensation. Our strategy often focuses on manufacturers as primary defendants because they typically have greater resources and insurance coverage. However, we evaluate each case individually to identify all liable parties and maximize your recovery potential. We handle claims against any or all parties as circumstances warrant.
Damages in product liability cases include economic and non-economic compensation. Economic damages cover medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, lost wages, diminished earning capacity, and any other quantifiable financial losses resulting from your injury. These damages are calculated based on actual expenses and documented losses. Non-economic damages compensate for pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and permanent disfigurement or disability. These damages reflect the subjective impact of your injury on daily living. In cases involving particularly egregious conduct, punitive damages may also be awarded to punish the manufacturer and deter similar behavior. Punitive damages are rare and reserved for situations where a company acted with gross negligence or willful misconduct. Our attorneys pursue all available damages on your behalf to ensure comprehensive compensation for every aspect of your injury and recovery.
Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd represents product liability clients on a contingency fee basis, meaning we charge no upfront fees or hourly rates. Instead, we collect a percentage of the settlement or judgment we obtain for you. This arrangement ensures we are fully invested in achieving the best possible outcome because we only earn a fee when you recover compensation. Our fee is typically deducted from your settlement or judgment amount, and we discuss the specific percentage during your initial consultation. Conditioning our fees on recovery removes financial barriers to pursuing justice. You never pay out of pocket for legal representation, investigation, expert witnesses, or filing fees. If we do not recover compensation, you owe us nothing. This contingency arrangement aligns our incentives perfectly with yours and demonstrates our confidence in your case.
Manufacturing defects occur when a product is made incorrectly or contains flawed materials, even though the design itself is safe. For example, a properly designed chair becomes defective if a manufacturing error causes the legs to be unstable. Design defects, by contrast, exist when the product’s design is inherently unsafe, meaning all units of that product pose risks. An example would be a chair designed with an unsafe back height that fails to provide adequate support regardless of how carefully it is manufactured. Both are grounds for liability, but design defect cases often involve more complex analysis and expert testimony about industry standards and alternative designs. Manufacturing defect cases are sometimes easier to prove because they involve concrete evidence of something going wrong during production. Design defect cases require demonstrating that a safer alternative design existed and was economically feasible. Our attorneys have experience handling both types of claims and understand the distinct challenges each presents.
Expert witnesses are often essential in product liability cases, particularly for design defect and failure to warn claims. Engineers can testify about product design, manufacturing standards, and whether safer alternatives existed. Medical professionals establish the connection between the defect and your injuries and can project long-term health impacts. Industry experts explain standard practices and whether the manufacturer’s conduct fell below industry norms. Manufacturing and metallurgical experts can analyze product failures and explain how defects occurred. While some straightforward manufacturing defect cases may succeed without experts, most product liability litigation benefits from qualified professional testimony. We have relationships with respected engineers, medical professionals, and industry consultants who have testified in numerous cases. We retain the experts necessary to support your claim and ensure juries understand complex technical information.
Modifying or misusing a product can complicate your claim, but it does not automatically bar recovery. Washington recognizes that modification or misuse may have contributed to your injury, but the manufacturer is still responsible if the product was defectively designed or manufactured. The key question is whether your use was reasonably foreseeable. For example, if a tool is used for a purpose mentioned in the manual or reasonably anticipated by the manufacturer, you can still recover even if you violated a safety instruction. Our role is to honestly assess how your product use affects your claim and develop arguments addressing manufacturer arguments about modification or misuse. In many cases, we demonstrate that even with improper use, the product defect was the primary cause of injury. We handle these nuanced situations by thoroughly investigating how the product was being used when the injury occurred.
When multiple companies share responsibility for a product defect, we pursue claims against all responsible parties. Washington allows joint and several liability, meaning each defendant can be held responsible for the full amount of damages, even if multiple parties contributed to the defect. For example, a component manufacturer might be liable for providing a defective part to an assembler, and the assembler might be liable for failing to discover the defect. Both can be named as defendants. Our investigation identifies every company involved in creating or distributing the defective product. We gather evidence against each defendant and pursue maximum recovery by holding all liable parties accountable. This approach ensures comprehensive compensation and prevents any defendant from escaping responsibility.
Product liability case timelines vary significantly based on case complexity, injury severity, and whether litigation is necessary. Many product liability claims are resolved through settlement within six months to two years. Cases involving serious injuries, multiple defects, or contested liability may take longer. Trial cases typically require two to five years or more from initial claim through final verdict, though most settle before trial occurs. Our attorneys work efficiently to move your case forward while ensuring thorough investigation and strong preparation. We keep you informed about timeline expectations and any delays. Early settlement discussions often lead to faster resolution, but we are prepared to pursue litigation fully if a fair settlement cannot be reached. We focus on achieving the best outcome rather than rushing to judgment.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields