When a conviction has been entered, the appellate process offers a critical opportunity to challenge legal errors that may have occurred during your trial. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we represent individuals throughout McChord Air Force Base and Pierce County who are seeking to overturn convictions or secure sentence reductions. Our legal team thoroughly reviews trial records, identifies procedural mistakes, and constructs compelling appellate arguments designed to protect your rights at every stage of the review process.
An appeal is not a new trial, but rather a review of whether legal errors affected your conviction or sentence. Appellate courts examine issues such as inadequate legal representation, prosecutorial misconduct, jury instruction errors, and insufficient evidence. Successfully appealing a conviction can result in a new trial, sentence reduction, or even case dismissal. Even if an appeal does not overturn a conviction entirely, it may establish important precedent and preserve your legal rights for future proceedings. Taking action immediately after conviction is essential, as there are strict deadlines for filing appeals.
The appellate process begins with filing a notice of appeal within the required timeframe following sentencing. We then obtain trial transcripts and case records for thorough review. Our team identifies potential issues for appeal, such as trial court errors, evidentiary problems, or constitutional violations. We prepare a detailed appellate brief presenting legal arguments and case citations to support your position. The appellate court reviews these briefs and may schedule oral arguments where both sides present their positions before a panel of judges.
A review by an appellate court of a trial court’s decision and the trial record to determine if legal errors occurred that affected the conviction or sentence. Direct appeals must be filed within strict deadlines following sentencing and are the primary mechanism for challenging trial court rulings.
A federal petition challenging the legality of detention or imprisonment, often used when other remedies have been exhausted. Habeas corpus petitions can raise federal constitutional issues and provide relief when state court appeals are unavailable or unsuccessful.
A post-conviction claim asserting that your attorney’s performance fell below acceptable standards and prejudiced your case. This ground allows courts to consider constitutional violations that occurred during trial but were not preserved through the normal appellate process.
A challenge to the length or conditions of a sentence imposed by a trial court. Sentencing appeals argue that the sentence was inappropriate, illegal, or imposed in violation of applicable sentencing laws and guidelines.
Strict deadlines apply to filing appeals and post-conviction motions, often within days or weeks of sentencing. Missing these deadlines can result in permanent loss of your right to appeal. Contact our office immediately if you have been convicted and believe legal errors affected your case.
Appeals depend on the trial record, which includes transcripts, evidence exhibits, and court filings. During trial, your attorney should make formal objections and create a clear record of any errors for appellate review. We help ensure all necessary documentation is preserved and properly presented to the appellate court.
If a direct appeal is unsuccessful, other remedies may remain available, including post-conviction relief motions and federal habeas corpus petitions. Different grounds for relief apply to each type of proceeding. We evaluate all available options to maximize your chances of success.
When your trial involved constitutional violations such as improper jury instructions, prosecutorial misconduct, or denial of due process rights, comprehensive appellate representation is essential. These issues require detailed legal analysis and persuasive briefing to present to the appellate court. We build strong constitutional arguments designed to secure meaningful relief.
If your trial attorney failed to present key evidence, make important objections, or adequately cross-examine witnesses, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim may be viable. These claims require careful investigation and presentation of evidence showing how your attorney’s failures prejudiced your defense. We thoroughly investigate trial performance to identify meritorious claims.
In some cases, the conviction itself may be legally sound, but the sentence imposed is excessive or improper. A focused sentencing appeal may be appropriate if the trial court misapplied sentencing guidelines or considered improper factors. This narrower approach can efficiently address specific sentencing concerns without challenging the underlying conviction.
When trial errors are limited to a few specific issues clearly documented in the trial record, a targeted appellate strategy focusing on those particular matters may be effective. This approach streamlines the briefing process while concentrating on the strongest arguments for relief. We determine whether a focused strategy or comprehensive representation best serves your interests.
When critical evidence is improperly excluded or prejudicial evidence is admitted, these evidentiary errors may provide grounds for appeal. Appellate courts regularly reverse convictions when trial courts make mistakes in applying evidence rules.
Incorrect or misleading jury instructions can affect the verdict and provide appellate grounds for relief or retrial. Courts take jury instruction accuracy seriously and frequently overturn convictions based on instructional defects. We carefully analyze jury instructions for legal sufficiency and accuracy.
Improper statements, withholding evidence, or other misconduct by prosecutors can violate due process rights and support successful appeals. Appellate courts address prosecutorial conduct issues to ensure fair trial standards are maintained. We investigate and present compelling arguments regarding prosecutorial violations.
Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd offers dedicated appellate representation for individuals throughout McChord Air Force Base, Pierce County, and beyond. Our attorneys possess deep knowledge of appellate procedure, criminal law, and constitutional principles necessary to advance your case effectively. We understand the appellate court system and have successfully represented clients in appeals addressing everything from DUI charges to serious felonies, ensuring your rights are protected at every stage.
We provide personalized attention to each client and thoroughly analyze your case to identify all viable grounds for relief. Our approach combines meticulous legal research, compelling brief writing, and persuasive oral advocacy. We maintain transparent communication throughout the appellate process and keep you informed about developments in your case. Our commitment to achieving the best possible outcome drives everything we do.
In Washington State, a notice of appeal must typically be filed within thirty days of sentencing. This deadline is strictly enforced, and missing it can result in permanent loss of your right to appeal. However, certain circumstances may allow extension of this deadline, such as filing a motion for reconsideration within fourteen days of sentencing. We monitor all applicable deadlines carefully and ensure that proper notice is filed within the required timeframe to preserve your appellate rights. Contact our office immediately after sentencing to discuss your appeal options and ensure compliance with all deadlines.
Yes, you can appeal your sentence without appealing your conviction. This is called a sentencing appeal or sentence-only appeal. Sentencing appeals challenge whether the trial court properly applied sentencing laws, considered appropriate factors, or imposed a sentence that is excessive or illegal. Even if you do not wish to challenge the conviction itself, a sentencing appeal can potentially result in a reduced sentence or modified conditions of probation. We evaluate whether a sentencing appeal is appropriate in your case and pursue this remedy if it may benefit you.
An ineffective assistance of counsel claim asserts that your trial attorney’s performance fell below acceptable professional standards and that this deficient performance prejudiced your defense. This may include failure to present key evidence, inadequate cross-examination of witnesses, failure to file necessary motions, or poor trial strategy. To succeed on this claim, you must show both that your attorney’s performance was deficient and that there is a reasonable probability that better performance would have changed the outcome. We investigate trial records thoroughly to identify meritorious ineffective assistance claims.
The appellate timeline varies depending on the complexity of your case and the appellate court’s schedule. Typically, the appellate process takes between nine months and two years from the date of appeal. Direct appeals generally move faster than post-conviction relief proceedings. The timeline includes time for briefing, potential oral arguments, and the court’s decision. While we cannot control the court’s pace, we ensure that all deadlines are met and that your case moves forward efficiently through the appellate system.
A direct appeal reviews the trial record and challenges legal errors that occurred during your trial. Direct appeals must be filed within strict deadlines following sentencing and are limited to issues preserved in the trial record. Post-conviction relief proceedings, such as those based on ineffective assistance of counsel, allow you to present new evidence and challenge issues not preserved during trial. These remedies serve different purposes and may be pursued at different times. We evaluate whether direct appeal, post-conviction relief, or both are appropriate in your circumstances.
Yes, if your state appellate appeal is unsuccessful, federal remedies may remain available. Federal habeas corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 allow you to challenge state convictions based on violations of federal constitutional law. However, state remedies must generally be exhausted first, and federal courts apply strict procedural rules. The standards for federal relief are more limited than state appellate review. We evaluate whether federal habeas relief is viable after state appeals are concluded and pursue appropriate federal remedies if available.
An appellate brief presents legal arguments and case citations supporting your appeal. The brief typically includes a statement of issues presented, statement of facts from the trial record, legal arguments with supporting authority, and a conclusion requesting specific relief. Appellate briefs must follow strict formatting and procedural rules established by the court. They must focus on legal errors and constitutional issues rather than presenting new evidence or witnesses. Our appellate team has extensive experience writing compelling, well-organized briefs designed to persuade the reviewing court.
Yes, there are filing fees associated with appeals in Washington courts. The specific fees vary depending on the type of appeal and the court where it is filed. In some cases, if you cannot afford filing fees, you may request permission to proceed in forma pauperis, which may waive or reduce these fees. Additionally, court-appointed counsel may be available if you cannot afford private appellate representation. We discuss all costs and fee options during our initial consultation and work with you to develop an affordable representation plan.
Expungement eligibility is separate from the appellate process. Even if an appeal is unsuccessful, you may still be eligible for expungement depending on your conviction type and applicable law. Washington law allows expungement of certain convictions under RCW 13.50.260 for juveniles and RCW 9.94A.640 for adults in certain circumstances. We evaluate expungement eligibility and can assist with expungement petitions either before or after your appeal concludes. Contact us to learn whether expungement may be available in your case.
Post-conviction relief proceedings allow you to present new evidence not available at trial, such as affidavits from witnesses, medical or scientific evidence, or documentation establishing facts that support your claim. This evidence must be material and not previously available through diligent effort. The types of evidence that can be presented depend on the specific grounds for relief asserted. Direct appeals, by contrast, are limited to the trial record and cannot consider new evidence. We investigate thoroughly to identify evidence that may support post-conviction relief claims.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields