If you have been convicted of a crime in Washington, an appeal may provide a pathway to challenge the conviction or sentence. The Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd represents clients throughout Bellingham and Whatcom County who seek to overturn convictions, reduce sentences, or address legal errors that occurred during trial. Our team understands the appellate process and works diligently to identify grounds for relief and present compelling arguments before higher courts.
Criminal convictions carry long-term consequences that extend far beyond sentencing. An appeal or post-conviction motion offers an opportunity to challenge errors that may have affected the fairness of your trial or the validity of your conviction. Grounds for appeal include trial court mistakes, insufficient evidence, improper jury instructions, prosecutor misconduct, or inadequate legal representation at trial. Pursuing relief early is essential, as appellate deadlines are strict. Without timely action, you may lose your right to challenge the conviction entirely.
A criminal appeal is a formal request to a higher court to review and potentially reverse or modify a conviction or sentence. In Washington, most appeals go to the Court of Appeals, with further review possible at the Supreme Court in limited circumstances. The appellate process focuses on legal issues, not fact-finding. Courts examine trial records to determine whether errors occurred that violated your constitutional rights or unfairly prejudiced the verdict. Appeals must raise legitimate legal grounds; a simple disagreement with the outcome is insufficient.
A written document submitted to an appellate court outlining the legal arguments, facts, and laws supporting your appeal. The brief identifies errors in the trial record and explains why those errors warrant reversal or modification of the conviction or sentence.
A constitutional claim asserting that your trial attorney’s performance was below professional standards and prejudiced the outcome of your case. Successful claims may result in a new trial or modified sentence.
A trial court error that a higher court determines did not affect the verdict or sentence. Even if an error occurred, appellate courts may uphold a conviction if the error is deemed harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
When a trial court makes a decision that exceeds the bounds of reason or is manifestly unreasonable. This standard applies to sentencing decisions and evidentiary rulings that may be challenged on appeal.
Appellate deadlines in Washington are strict and non-negotiable. You typically have 30 days from sentencing to file a notice of appeal, and missing this deadline may permanently waive your right to appeal. If you believe errors occurred during your trial, contact an appellate attorney immediately to preserve your rights and determine the best course of action.
Appeals are built on thorough review of trial records, transcripts, and court filings. Obtaining complete documentation of your case early ensures nothing is overlooked during appellate analysis. Your attorney will need access to jury instructions, evidence exhibits, and the trial transcript to identify potential grounds for relief.
Different types of issues on appeal receive different levels of scrutiny from appellate courts. Constitutional errors and ineffective counsel claims receive strict scrutiny, while sentencing decisions are reviewed for abuse of discretion. Understanding which standard applies to your claim helps set realistic expectations about the likelihood of success.
If significant errors occurred during your trial—such as improper jury instructions, exclusion of important evidence, or prosecutorial misconduct—an appeal may be warranted. Constitutional violations, including denial of due process or right to counsel, provide strong grounds for appellate relief. These errors require thorough legal analysis to present effectively before higher courts.
If your trial attorney failed to present critical defenses, missed strategic opportunities, or provided inadequate representation, you may have grounds for a post-conviction claim. Demonstrating that counsel’s performance fell below professional standards and prejudiced the outcome requires detailed analysis and often expert testimony. An appellate attorney can evaluate whether ineffective assistance claims are viable in your case.
If your conviction is sound but the sentence appears excessive, challenging only the sentencing may be appropriate. Appellate courts review sentences for abuse of discretion, considering mitigating factors and sentencing guidelines. In these cases, focused appellate advocacy on sentencing issues alone may suffice.
When DNA evidence, witness recantations, or other significant proof of innocence emerges after conviction, a targeted post-conviction petition may address only this new evidence. These claims require demonstrating that the new evidence would likely produce a different verdict. Strategic focus on compelling evidence can be more effective than broad appellate challenges.
Serious felony convictions involving DUI, drug charges, violent crimes, or white-collar offenses often have multiple trial issues worth reviewing. Appellate counsel can identify errors that individually or cumulatively warrant overturning the conviction.
Even misdemeanor convictions can be challenged on appeal if constitutional errors or sentencing issues are present. Many appellants successfully reduce jail time or probation length through appellate advocacy.
After conviction, new evidence such as recanted testimony, DNA results, or exculpatory police reports may emerge. Post-conviction petitions preserve your chance at relief when prior counsel did not present this evidence.
The Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd understands that criminal convictions have devastating consequences for your future. Our team approaches every appeal and post-conviction case with the seriousness it deserves, conducting thorough record review and developing persuasive legal arguments. We have successfully represented Bellingham residents in appellate matters and possess deep knowledge of Washington’s appellate courts and procedures. Your case receives personalized attention from attorneys who genuinely care about achieving the best possible outcome.
We provide clear communication throughout the appellate process, explaining your options and setting realistic expectations. Our firm combines strategic thinking with meticulous legal research to identify every viable ground for relief. Whether pursuing a direct appeal, post-conviction motion, or combination of remedies, we marshal all available arguments and present them compellingly before the courts. Contact us today for a confidential consultation about your appellate case.
In Washington, you must file a notice of appeal within 30 days of sentencing to preserve your appellate rights. This deadline is strict and rarely waived. Missing this deadline may permanently bar your right to appeal, making it critical to contact an appellate attorney immediately upon conviction. If you are still in custody or struggling with the conviction, act quickly to preserve all available remedies. If you fail to file within 30 days, you may still pursue post-conviction relief through other motions, but direct appeal options close. An experienced appellate attorney will ensure all necessary filings occur on time and that your case receives proper attention before the deadline passes.
Yes, misdemeanor convictions can be appealed on the same grounds as felony convictions. You have the same 30-day filing deadline after sentencing. Appeals may challenge jury instructions, evidentiary errors, constitutional violations, or sentencing decisions. Many misdemeanor appellants successfully overturn convictions or reduce sentences through appellate advocacy. Misdemeanor appeals follow similar appellate procedures as felony cases. The Bellingham District or Superior Court errors are reviewed by the Court of Appeals. If constitutional issues are involved, the Supreme Court may also review the case. An appellate attorney can assess whether your misdemeanor conviction has viable grounds for relief.
An ineffective assistance of counsel claim asserts that your trial attorney’s performance fell below professional standards and prejudiced the outcome of your case. This is a constitutional right guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. To prevail, you must show that counsel’s representation was deficient and that this deficiency likely affected the verdict or sentence. These claims require detailed analysis of trial strategy, evidence presented or omitted, and how attorney errors may have changed the case outcome. Post-conviction motions asserting ineffective assistance are common remedies when trial counsel failed to present adequate defenses or missed critical opportunities. Successful claims may result in a new trial or resentencing.
The appellate timeline varies depending on case complexity and court workload. From filing the notice of appeal through briefing, oral arguments, and decision, most appeals take 12 to 24 months. Some simpler cases are resolved faster, while complex matters with multiple issues may extend beyond two years. Post-conviction motions sometimes move more quickly, particularly if limited issues are raised. Understanding these timelines helps set realistic expectations. While the process may seem lengthy, thorough appellate review is essential for achieving the best outcome. Your attorney will provide updates on your specific case’s progress through the appellate system.
Numerous grounds can support a criminal appeal, including trial court errors in jury instructions, evidentiary rulings, or procedural matters. Constitutional violations such as ineffective assistance of counsel, denial of due process, or prosecutorial misconduct provide strong appellate grounds. Insufficient evidence may also warrant reversal if the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Additionally, sentencing errors, newly discovered evidence, and claims of double jeopardy can support appeals or post-conviction relief. An experienced appellate attorney reviews your complete trial record to identify all viable grounds for relief and determines which arguments are most compelling for your specific case.
Yes, you can appeal even if you pleaded guilty, though the grounds for appeal are more limited. By pleading guilty, you generally waive challenges to evidence, but constitutional errors, ineffective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations, and sentencing issues may still be appealed. You must also establish that your guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary, or that counsel failed to advise you properly before accepting the plea. Post-conviction motions alleging that your attorney coerced the plea or failed to investigate defenses before advising you to plead guilty can be powerful remedies. An appellate attorney will evaluate whether your guilty plea can be withdrawn or challenged based on counsel’s representation or constitutional violations.
A direct appeal is filed immediately after sentencing and reviews the trial record for legal errors. It challenges what occurred during the trial and sentencing hearing. Post-conviction relief, by contrast, includes motions filed after the appeal period, asserting new claims such as ineffective assistance of counsel or newly discovered evidence that were not raised on direct appeal. Both remedies can result in conviction reversal, resentencing, or new trials. Direct appeals must be filed within 30 days; post-conviction motions have different deadlines depending on the claim. A comprehensive strategy may involve pursuing both direct appeal and post-conviction relief, with each addressing different legal issues.
An appeal may result in various outcomes. Some appeals lead to conviction reversal and a new trial, while others result in sentencing modification or a directed acquittal. Some appeals are partially successful, overturning some convictions but upholding others. Other appeals are denied entirely, though denial does not preclude future post-conviction relief. Whether you receive a new trial depends on the nature of the error and appellate court findings. Constitutional violations and ineffective counsel claims are more likely to result in trial grants. Sentencing appeals often result in reduced sentences rather than new trials. Your attorney will explain the likely outcomes for your specific appellate issues.
If your direct appeal is denied, post-conviction motions or petitions to the Supreme Court may still be available. An appeal denial does not eliminate all relief options. You may file a motion for reconsideration or raise new issues through post-conviction procedures. If the denial involves significant legal questions, a petition to the Washington Supreme Court for review is possible, though only a small percentage are accepted. Your appellate attorney can advise on next steps after an appeal denial and pursue remaining remedies. Some cases benefit from multiple appeals or combined appellate strategies. Even denied appeals sometimes lead to successful post-conviction relief or further review by higher courts.
Appeal costs vary based on case complexity, whether trial transcripts must be ordered, and the extent of legal research and briefing required. Many appellate cases involve substantial attorney fees and court costs. Some clients qualify for public defender appellate representation if they meet indigency requirements. The Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd discusses fees and payment options during your initial consultation. Investing in appellate representation can be worthwhile if it results in conviction reversal or significant sentence reduction. Financing options and fee agreements are available. Contact our office to discuss your case and receive information about costs and payment arrangements.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields