When a defective product causes injury, victims deserve legal representation that fights for their rights. Product liability cases require a thorough understanding of manufacturing standards, design flaws, and consumer protection laws. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we handle complex product injury claims across Washington state. Our team investigates how products failed, who bears responsibility, and what compensation you deserve. We represent clients injured by defective consumer goods, equipment, appliances, vehicles, and other manufactured items.
Product liability claims serve a critical function in holding manufacturers accountable for unsafe goods. When companies cut corners on safety or fail to warn consumers about known risks, legal action forces change and protects the public. Beyond accountability, a successful claim provides financial recovery for victims who face mounting medical bills and lost wages. These cases often require substantial resources for investigation, expert analysis, and litigation. Having qualified legal representation ensures your rights are protected and that manufacturers face consequences for negligence, defects, or failure to warn consumers.
Product liability law recognizes three main theories of recovery: manufacturing defects, design defects, and failure to warn. Manufacturing defects occur when a product deviates from its intended design during production, making it unreasonably dangerous. Design defects exist when a product’s design itself poses unreasonable risks that could have been prevented with a safer alternative design. Failure to warn claims arise when manufacturers don’t provide adequate instructions or warnings about known dangers. Each theory requires different evidence and expert analysis. Understanding which theory applies to your situation is essential for building a strong case.
A deviation from the intended design that occurs during production, making a product unreasonably dangerous. Examples include incorrect assembly, contamination, or faulty components that shouldn’t have left the factory.
When a manufacturer fails to provide adequate warnings or instructions about known dangers associated with a product. This includes failing to inform consumers of risks that consumers wouldn’t reasonably discover on their own.
A product design that creates unreasonable risks of harm, even when manufactured correctly. This occurs when a safer alternative design was feasible and could have prevented the injury.
A legal doctrine that holds manufacturers responsible for defective products regardless of whether negligence can be proven. Victims only need to show the product was defective and caused injury.
Preserve the defective product and take photographs from multiple angles before it’s altered or destroyed. Keep all medical records, receipts, packaging, instructions, and warranties related to the product. Document when you purchased the item, how you were using it, and exactly what happened when the injury occurred.
Get immediate medical evaluation even if injuries seem minor, as some harm develops over time. Medical records create a crucial timeline and documentation of your injuries causally linked to the product defect. This documentation becomes essential evidence in pursuing a product liability claim and establishing the extent of your damages.
Manufacturers often offer quick settlements that don’t reflect the full value of your claim. An attorney can evaluate whether offers adequately cover medical expenses, lost wages, and ongoing care needs. Early legal consultation protects your rights and ensures you understand all available options.
Product liability often involves manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and component suppliers who share responsibility. Identifying all liable parties and coordinating claims against them requires legal knowledge and resources. Comprehensive representation ensures you pursue all available avenues for recovery and don’t leave compensation on the table.
Serious injuries typically require engineering experts, medical specialists, and accident reconstructionists to establish causation and damages. These experts command significant fees that individual victims cannot afford alone. Legal firms have established relationships with qualified experts and resources to fund comprehensive investigations that strengthen your case substantially.
In cases where a product clearly failed due to manufacturing error and liability is obvious, some insurers settle quickly. If injuries are minor and medical costs are low, settlement negotiations may resolve matters without extensive litigation. However, legal consultation still ensures you’re not accepting less than fair value.
When you have strong documentation of a defect and injuries are minimal, some claims resolve more simply. Basic legal guidance helps you understand your options and communicate with insurers effectively. Even in straightforward cases, having attorney support prevents costly mistakes in handling your claim.
Injuries from appliances, electronics, tools, furniture, and other household items that malfunction or have design flaws. These cases require proving the defect existed and directly caused your injuries.
Accidents caused by brake failures, steering defects, airbag malfunctions, or other vehicle component failures. Automotive cases often involve recalls and regulatory data that support liability claims.
Injuries from defective machinery, tools, or safety equipment used in employment settings. These claims may exist alongside workers’ compensation benefits.
Our firm brings extensive experience handling product liability cases throughout Washington, including Whatcom County. We understand how to investigate defective products, work with technical experts, and present compelling evidence to juries. Our attorneys have successfully negotiated settlements and tried cases against manufacturers with substantial resources. We handle the legal complexities so you can focus on recovery. Your success is measured by the compensation we recover and the accountability we achieve for you.
We operate on contingency, meaning you pay no upfront fees and we only recover a fee if we win your case. This arrangement aligns our interests with yours and demonstrates our confidence in your claim. We invest our own resources into investigations, expert reports, and litigation costs because we believe in your case. Our team stays current with product liability law changes and maintains relationships with the best engineers and medical professionals. Call us at 253-544-5434 for a free consultation about your product injury claim.
Washington law establishes a three-year statute of limitations for product liability claims, measured from the date you discovered the injury or should have discovered it. This means you have three years from the incident to file a lawsuit. However, in some cases involving latent injuries that manifest later, the clock may start when you reasonably discover the connection between the product and your injury. Acting quickly is important because evidence deteriorates and witnesses’ memories fade over time. We recommend consulting an attorney as soon as possible after suffering a product-related injury to ensure your claim isn’t barred by the statute of limitations. The three-year deadline applies to most personal injury product liability claims. Some product types may have different rules, particularly for pharmaceutical and medical device cases. If you’re unsure whether your claim falls within the statute of limitations, contact us immediately. We can evaluate your situation, preserve evidence, and file claims before deadlines expire. Waiting too long risks losing your right to recover damages entirely.
In successful product liability cases, you can recover economic damages including all medical expenses from emergency care through ongoing treatment and rehabilitation. Lost wages during recovery periods, reduced earning capacity if injuries are permanent, and costs for future medical care are also recoverable. Property damage to other items harmed in the incident may be included. Beyond economic damages, you can pursue non-economic damages for pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and permanent disability or disfigurement. In cases involving willful misconduct or reckless disregard for consumer safety, punitive damages may be available to punish the manufacturer and deter similar conduct. The total value of your claim depends on injury severity, recovery prospects, impact on your life, and the strength of evidence proving defect and liability. Our attorneys calculate comprehensive damage amounts that reflect both your current losses and future impacts. We pursue fair settlements or present compelling cases to juries to maximize your recovery.
Product liability operates under a legal doctrine called strict liability in Washington, which means you don’t need to prove the manufacturer was negligent or careless. Instead, you only need to show the product was defective and the defect caused your injury. This significantly simplifies product liability cases compared to traditional negligence claims. The manufacturer is liable for a defective product regardless of how carefully it was designed or manufactured, provided a defect existed. While negligence doesn’t need to be proven, you must establish that the product had a defect in design, manufacturing, or warnings. You also must prove the defect directly caused your injury and that you were using the product in a reasonable manner. Our attorneys gather evidence demonstrating these elements through product testing, expert analysis, and documentation of how the product failed. This streamlined legal standard gives injured consumers a meaningful path to recovery.
When multiple companies contributed to a defective product, all may share liability. Manufacturers who designed or produced components bear responsibility. Distributors and retailers who placed the defective product into commerce may also be liable. Component suppliers who manufactured parts used in the final product can be held accountable. Our investigation identifies every party involved in bringing the product to you and determines each party’s role in the defect. Under Washington law, you can pursue claims against all liable parties. The responsible companies may dispute which party bears primary responsibility, but that’s their concern, not yours. We handle complex multi-party cases by coordinating claims, managing different insurance carriers, and ensuring you recover from all available sources. Some companies settle early while others require litigation. Our comprehensive approach maximizes your recovery by pursuing accountability from every entity that contributed to your injury.
Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd works on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing upfront and no fees if we don’t recover compensation for you. When we successfully resolve your case through settlement or trial, our fee comes from the recovery amount, typically one-third to forty percent depending on case complexity and whether litigation is required. All costs for investigation, expert reports, medical records, filing fees, and litigation expenses are advanced by our firm and deducted from your recovery. You never pay out-of-pocket for legal representation. This fee structure ensures we’re fully invested in obtaining the best possible outcome for your case. We won’t take cases we don’t believe in because we bear the financial risk. You can focus on healing while we handle the legal heavy lifting and financial investment. After settling or winning your case, we provide a detailed accounting showing costs and fees deducted from your gross recovery. You receive the net amount after these deductions, which remains substantial compensation for your injuries.
Critical evidence includes the actual defective product itself, which should be preserved without modification whenever possible. Photographs from multiple angles showing the defect are essential. Receipts, warranties, packaging, and instruction manuals demonstrate how you obtained and were supposed to use the product. Medical records linking your injuries to the defect create crucial documentation. Photographs of your injuries, medical bills, pay stubs showing lost wages, and evidence of treatment establish damages. Witness statements from anyone present when the injury occurred strengthen your case. Accident reports, police reports, or insurance reports create independent documentation. Product recall notices, safety warnings, or manufacturer communications about similar incidents demonstrate known dangers. Our investigation may uncover design documents, internal communications, prior complaints, or testing data showing the manufacturer knew about the defect. We work with engineers to examine the product and determine exactly how it failed. The more evidence we gather, the stronger your case becomes.
Washington follows comparative negligence principles, allowing you to recover even if you were partially responsible for the accident. Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault. For example, if you were 20% responsible and damages total $100,000, you recover $80,000. Many product injuries involve some degree of user behavior, yet the manufacturer remains liable if the product had a defect that made it unreasonably dangerous or if warnings were inadequate. Manufacturers frequently argue that consumer misuse caused injuries to deflect responsibility. We counter these arguments by demonstrating the defect posed dangers even with reasonable use or that inadequate warnings failed to protect consumers who used the product as intended. Even if the manufacturer shows some user contribution, we pursue maximum recovery given your circumstances. Our attorneys understand how to present your actions in the most favorable light while establishing the product’s defect as the primary cause.
Product liability cases vary widely in timeline depending on complexity, number of parties, and whether settlement occurs or trial is necessary. Simpler cases with clear liability and obvious damages may settle within months. Complex cases involving multiple defendants, significant expert analysis, and disputed liability often take one to three years to resolve. Some cases require years of investigation, expert reports, discovery, depositions, and motion practice before reaching trial. Factors affecting timeline include how quickly the manufacturer responds, whether discovery reveals smoking gun evidence, and court scheduling. We work efficiently to move cases forward while thoroughly preparing to maximize your recovery. We’ll provide realistic timeframe estimates based on your specific situation. During the process, we keep you informed and involved in decisions. Many clients are surprised how relatively quickly their cases resolve once we engage the insurance companies and manufacturers.
Manufacturing defects occur when a product deviates from its intended design during production, creating unreasonable danger. For example, a faulty part installed backwards or missing entirely represents a manufacturing defect. The product was properly designed but failed in execution. Design defects, conversely, exist in products manufactured correctly according to their design specifications, but the design itself creates unreasonable risks of harm. A design defect means a safer alternative design was feasible and could have prevented the injury. For instance, a knife handle lacking a guard poses design defect risks even if perfectly manufactured. Both types are actionable under strict liability. Manufacturing defects are often easier to prove because the deviation is apparent. Design defects require comparing the current design to safer alternatives and demonstrating their feasibility. Our investigation determines which type applies to your situation and frames the claim accordingly.
Whether to settle or proceed to trial depends on the settlement offer, case strength, and your needs. We advise accepting reasonable settlements that fairly compensate your injuries, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of trial. However, if settlement offers are inadequate or the manufacturer acts in bad faith, trial may be necessary. We evaluate offers objectively and present the strengths and weaknesses of your case. Manufacturers often use delay tactics, deny liability, or undervalue claims hoping you’ll accept less rather than wait. We don’t pressure you into unfavorable settlements but instead prepare for trial confidently. Our litigation experience means manufacturers take our cases seriously knowing we’ll try them aggressively if necessary. Your input guides the decision, informed by our professional assessment of what’s achievable. Most cases settle eventually, but our willingness to try cases strengthens settlement negotiations.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields