If you’ve been convicted and believe errors occurred during your trial, an appeal may provide the opportunity to challenge that conviction. At the Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we understand the complexities of the appellate process and work diligently to identify and present viable arguments that could result in a reversal, new trial, or reduced sentence. Our team reviews trial records, transcripts, and legal proceedings to uncover potential issues that warrant appellate consideration. We serve clients throughout Colfax and Whitman County with dedicated representation at every stage of the appeals process.
Appeals provide a critical mechanism to correct trial errors, protect constitutional rights, and challenge improper sentences. Many convictions contain legal defects that only become apparent through careful appellate review. Pursuing an appeal demonstrates your commitment to clearing your record and may result in significant outcomes including conviction reversal, new trial orders, sentence reductions, or case dismissals. Even if your trial attorney made errors, appellate counsel can raise these issues on your behalf. The appellate process also creates a permanent written record of your legal arguments, which can be valuable for future proceedings.
A criminal appeal challenges a conviction or sentence by asking a higher court to review the trial record for legal errors. Unlike trials, appeals do not involve new evidence or witness testimony. Instead, appellate attorneys analyze the trial transcript, legal documents, and applicable law to identify issues that may have violated your rights or affected the fairness of proceedings. Common appellate issues include insufficient evidence, improper jury instructions, prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective counsel, and sentencing violations. The appellate court reviews these arguments and determines whether errors require reversal or modification of your conviction.
The formal document filed with the trial court to initiate the appellate process, typically required within 30 days of sentencing or conviction entry.
A written legal document submitted to the appellate court that outlines the issues on appeal, arguments for reversal, and relevant case law supporting your position.
The requirement that legal objections be raised at trial so appellate courts can review them; failure to preserve error typically prevents appellate consideration.
The opportunity for attorneys to present arguments directly to the appellate judges, answer questions, and discuss key issues in the case.
Appeals operate under strict procedural deadlines that, if missed, can result in loss of your right to appeal. Notice of appeal must typically be filed within 30 days of sentencing or conviction entry. Immediately consulting with an appellate attorney after conviction ensures these critical deadlines are met and your rights are protected.
Most legal issues can only be appealed if they were properly raised and objected to during your trial. Issues not preserved at trial are generally forfeited on appeal unless they involve constitutional violations or plain error. Working with appellate counsel early helps identify which issues can still be raised and what arguments remain available.
Gather all trial documents, transcripts, evidence, and correspondence related to your case to provide your appellate attorney with complete information. The appellate process depends entirely on what appears in the trial record, so ensuring your attorney has access to all relevant materials strengthens potential arguments. Early organization of case materials accelerates the appeals process.
When trial errors significantly affected your case outcome—such as improper jury instructions, evidentiary mistakes, or procedural violations—comprehensive appellate representation becomes vital. These errors may not be apparent to individuals unfamiliar with legal standards and appellate procedure. An experienced appellate attorney can identify, research, and present these issues effectively to appellate courts.
If your trial attorney failed to raise timely objections, pursue viable defense strategies, or present available evidence, appellate counsel can raise ineffective assistance claims. Appellate representation specifically addresses trial counsel shortcomings through the appellate record review. Comprehensive post-conviction advocacy ensures these representation failures are properly documented and challenged.
If your conviction involved clear constitutional violations apparent from the trial record—such as inadequate Miranda warnings or unconstitutional jury selection—a direct appeal may address these issues effectively. These violations are often apparent without extensive investigation or record development. A focused appellate brief addressing constitutional errors may be sufficient.
When your conviction is sound but sentencing errors exist—such as improper guideline application or illegal sentences—appealing solely sentencing issues may be appropriate. Direct appeals of sentencing determinations can result in resentencing without requiring broader conviction review. Limited appellate focus on sentencing arguments may achieve necessary relief efficiently.
If you entered a guilty plea but later discovered significant trial defense issues or ineffective assistance, appellate review may reveal whether constitutional errors tainted your plea. Courts can sometimes vacate pleas based on appellate findings of deficient representation.
When your sentence is significantly disproportionate to comparable cases or based on improper legal standards, appellate challenges to sentencing decisions can result in reduction or modification. Appellate courts review sentencing discretion and guideline compliance.
If recent court decisions change legal standards applicable to your conviction—affecting evidence admissibility, jury instructions, or sentencing law—appellate reconsideration may be warranted. Legal landscape changes can support post-conviction relief motions.
Our firm brings dedicated appellate practice experience to represent clients throughout Colfax, Whitman County, and Washington state. We understand that convictions have profound consequences for your life, employment, family relationships, and future opportunities. By pursuing thorough appellate review, we work to protect your rights and pursue viable options for conviction reversal, sentence reduction, or case dismissal. Our team maintains current knowledge of appellate procedure, statutory requirements, and case law affecting criminal appeals. We approach each case with the careful analysis and persuasive advocacy that appellate courts expect.
We recognize that the appellate process can feel overwhelming when facing a conviction. Our attorneys guide you through each procedural step, explain available options, and develop strategic appellate arguments tailored to your specific circumstances. We handle all aspects of appeal preparation including record review, legal research, brief writing, and oral argument presentation. Your success on appeal depends on experienced representation that identifies viable issues and presents them persuasively to appellate judges. Contact us today to discuss whether an appeal may benefit your case.
You must file a notice of appeal within 30 days of sentencing or entry of conviction in Washington state courts. This deadline is strict, and missing it typically results in loss of appellate rights unless exceptional circumstances justify delay. Federal appeals have different timing rules depending on whether the defendant is incarcerated. Immediately consulting with an appellate attorney upon conviction ensures these critical deadlines are met and your right to appeal is preserved. If you cannot afford appellate counsel, you may request court-appointed representation by filing a motion for appointed counsel. The court evaluates your financial circumstances and appoints an attorney if you qualify. Regardless of whether you hire private counsel or receive appointed representation, timely action protects your appellate rights and ensures your case receives proper legal review.
Yes, you can appeal after entering a guilty plea, but appellate review is more limited than appeals following trial conviction. Direct appeals after guilty pleas typically address only issues apparent from the pleading colloquy and sentencing record, such as improper plea colloquy, inadequate advisement of constitutional rights, or sentencing errors. You cannot generally challenge the underlying evidence or facts supporting your guilty plea on direct appeal. However, post-conviction relief motions can raise claims of ineffective assistance of counsel related to plea negotiation and acceptance. If your trial attorney provided inadequate assistance before accepting your plea or failed to explore viable defenses, post-conviction relief may be available. These claims require development beyond the trial record and involve different procedural mechanisms than direct appeal.
Appellable errors include improper jury instructions that misstated legal standards, evidentiary errors admitting prejudicial evidence or excluding favorable evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, inadequate jury selection procedures, insufficient evidence supporting conviction, sentencing errors, and ineffective assistance of counsel. Constitutional violations such as improper Miranda warnings, right to counsel violations, and improper searches may also support appeals. Additionally, errors in applying criminal statutes, procedural violations affecting trial fairness, and errors in jury composition can constitute appealable issues. However, not all trial errors are appealable. The error must have been preserved through timely objection at trial, except for constitutional errors or issues affecting fundamental fairness. Appellate courts apply different standards of review depending on error type. Constitutional errors require reversal unless harmless beyond reasonable doubt, while other errors must have materially affected trial outcome. An experienced appellate attorney can analyze your case to identify which errors may support successful appeal.
Filing an appeal does not automatically delay your sentence unless you request a stay pending appellate decision. You may file a motion requesting that your sentence be stayed (postponed) while the appeal is pending. The trial court evaluates whether you demonstrate substantial question regarding appellate merit and whether you are likely to succeed on appeal. If the court denies a stay, you typically begin serving your sentence while the appeal proceeds. Some circumstances, such as when you are appealing conviction rather than sentence, may result in earlier release pending appeal resolution. If your appeal is granted and a new trial is ordered or conviction is reversed, you would not serve the original sentence. However, you must understand that filing an appeal does not guarantee delay in sentence service. Discussing stay options and appellate timeline with your attorney helps you understand realistic timing expectations.
Direct appeal challenges conviction or sentence based on errors in the trial record. Direct appeals must be filed within 30 days of sentencing and proceed to the appellate court based solely on the trial record. Post-conviction relief, typically pursued through habeas corpus petitions or Rule 35 motions, addresses claims that cannot be raised on direct appeal, such as newly discovered evidence, changed law, or development of ineffective assistance claims requiring factual development. Post-conviction relief generally has longer timeframes for filing and may involve evidentiary hearings. Many criminal cases benefit from pursuing both direct appeal and post-conviction relief through different motions. Direct appeal addresses legal errors evident from the trial record, while post-conviction relief targets issues requiring investigation or fact development beyond the record. Strategic coordination of these mechanisms maximizes your chances of obtaining relief.
Yes, you can raise claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal or through post-conviction relief. Ineffective assistance claims require showing that your attorney’s performance was deficient—falling below standards expected of reasonably competent counsel—and that the deficient performance prejudiced your case, meaning there is reasonable probability that but for the error, the outcome would have been different. This analysis applies whether errors involve trial strategy, investigation failures, or failure to raise available legal arguments. These claims often require development beyond the trial record through affidavits, investigating attorney declarations, and factual presentation demonstrating how your attorney’s mistakes affected your case. Post-conviction relief motions provide better mechanisms for developing ineffective assistance claims than direct appeal. However, some ineffective assistance issues may be raised on direct appeal based on the trial record alone.
Appeal costs vary significantly based on case complexity, whether you hire private counsel or receive court-appointed representation, and the scope of appellate issues. Private appellate attorneys typically charge hourly rates ranging from $150 to $400 per hour, with appeals requiring anywhere from 40 to 200+ hours depending on case complexity. Flat fee arrangements for appeals are also common. If you cannot afford counsel, request court-appointed representation from the trial court. Costs associated with appeals include attorney fees for record review, legal research, brief preparation, and oral argument. Additionally, you may incur costs for obtaining trial transcripts, record copying, and filing fees with the appellate court. Discuss fee arrangements and cost estimates with your appellate attorney to understand financial obligations.
Appeal success rates depend on the specific issues involved and strength of applicable law. Some estimates suggest appellate reversal rates range from 5 to 15 percent for direct appeals, though rates vary significantly by jurisdiction and case type. However, these statistics do not reflect partial successes such as sentence reduction, new trial grants, or remand for resentencing. Additionally, many appeals that fail on direct appeal succeed through post-conviction relief. Success depends on whether viable legal issues support reversal and whether appellate courts find errors sufficient to warrant relief. Your attorney’s experience identifying strong appellate issues, thorough legal research, and persuasive brief writing significantly impact appellate success. Some cases present obvious reversible errors while others require creative legal arguments. Understanding realistic prospects for your specific issues helps you make informed decisions about pursuing appeal.
Yes, you can appeal a sentence without appealing the conviction. Sentence-only appeals challenge sentencing determinations while accepting the underlying conviction as valid. These appeals may address improper application of sentencing guidelines, illegal sentences exceeding statutory maximums, sentences based on unconstitutional factors, or sentences that were clearly excessive. Sentence-only appeals proceed more efficiently than full conviction appeals because the appellate court does not review trial procedure or evidentiary issues. Sentence appeals may result in resentencing to a lower term, modification of conditions, or remand for resentencing consideration of factors the trial court ignored. If you are satisfied that your conviction is valid but believe your sentence was imposed improperly, a sentence-only appeal may be the appropriate appellate mechanism.
Oral argument involves presenting your case directly to the appellate judges in a courtroom setting. Your appellate attorney presents key arguments from your brief, with time limits typically ranging from 15 to 30 minutes per side. The prosecution presents arguments defending the conviction or sentence. Appellate judges ask questions about your legal arguments, case law, and procedural issues. Your attorney must be prepared to answer questions thoroughly and address judicial concerns about your legal position. Oral argument is not automatic in all appeals; courts often screen cases and schedule argument only in cases presenting substantial issues. When scheduled, oral argument provides valuable opportunity to clarify legal positions, address judicial questions, and persuade judges of your arguments’ merit. Experienced appellate attorneys prepare thoroughly for oral argument by anticipating judicial questions and preparing focused responses.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields