If you’ve been convicted of a crime, an appeal may offer a path to challenge the conviction or sentence. Appeals require detailed legal knowledge and understanding of procedural rules that vary at different court levels. The Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd have extensive experience handling criminal appeals throughout Yakima County, including Wapato. We carefully review trial records, identify potential legal errors, and develop compelling arguments for appellate courts. Our team understands the specific challenges of the appeals process and works diligently to present the strongest possible case on your behalf.
A criminal conviction carries life-altering consequences, making appeals a critical opportunity to address legal errors that may have occurred at trial. The appellate process allows you to challenge sentencing decisions, procedural violations, ineffective assistance of counsel claims, and insufficient evidence findings. Successful appeals can result in case dismissal, new trials, or sentence reduction. Without skilled representation, important legal issues may be overlooked or inadequately presented. The Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd provides thorough case analysis and vigorous advocacy to ensure your rights are fully protected during the appellate process.
Criminal appeals involve presenting written and oral arguments to higher courts, asking them to review specific legal issues from your trial or sentencing. Unlike trial proceedings, appeals don’t involve presenting new evidence or questioning witnesses. Instead, appellate courts examine the trial record to determine whether legal errors occurred and whether those errors warrant reversal or modification of your conviction or sentence. The appellate process requires mastery of complex procedural rules, including strict filing deadlines and specific formatting requirements. Courts apply different standards of review depending on the type of error being challenged.
A formal written document submitted to the appellate court that presents legal arguments for why a conviction or sentence should be reversed or modified. The brief includes a statement of facts, legal arguments, citations to relevant law and prior cases, and a request for specific relief.
The legal standard that appellate courts apply when evaluating whether trial court errors require reversal. Different standards apply to different types of issues, ranging from de novo review to abuse of discretion standards.
The formal document that initiates an appeal and must be filed within a strict time frame, typically within 30 days of sentencing. Filing a timely notice of appeal is essential for preserving your right to appellate review.
A legal claim that your trial attorney’s performance fell below professionally reasonable standards and resulted in prejudice to your case. This ground for appeal requires demonstrating both deficient performance and a reasonable probability of different outcome.
Missing the deadline to file a notice of appeal can permanently waive your right to appellate review. Contact an attorney immediately after sentencing to ensure this critical deadline is met. Acting quickly protects your ability to pursue all available legal remedies and challenge your conviction or sentence.
Many appellate issues must be raised objections at trial to preserve them for appeal. Your trial attorney’s failure to object to certain issues may waive your ability to challenge them on appeal. Working with an attorney who understands appellate issues and raises them properly at trial significantly strengthens your appeal.
Collecting trial transcripts, evidence, witness statements, and other documentation early in the appellate process accelerates your case. Some records may become difficult to obtain as time passes. Having comprehensive documentation allows your appellate attorney to conduct thorough analysis and develop stronger arguments.
When your case involves multiple legal errors, complicated constitutional issues, or intricate sentencing questions, comprehensive appellate representation becomes essential. These complex matters require detailed legal analysis, extensive case law research, and sophisticated legal arguments to present effectively to appellate courts. Our firm provides the thorough advocacy necessary to address complex legal challenges.
Proving ineffective assistance of counsel requires demonstrating that your trial attorney’s performance was deficient and prejudicial to your case outcome. This challenging claim demands detailed analysis of trial strategy, applicable law, and what a reasonably performing attorney would have done. Our experienced attorneys have successfully pursued ineffective counsel claims that resulted in reversals and new trials.
If your appeal focuses on a clear sentencing error or statutory violation, a more focused appellate approach may be appropriate. When the legal basis for your appeal is straightforward and well-established in case law, concentrated representation on that specific issue can be effective. We assess whether limited or comprehensive representation best serves your interests.
Sometimes appeals center on specific procedural violations or technical issues that can be addressed through focused legal arguments. When the factual record clearly supports your position and the legal issue is narrow in scope, concentrated representation on that particular matter may be sufficient. We tailor our approach based on the specific circumstances of your case.
When trial evidence fails to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, an appeal challenging the sufficiency of the evidence may overturn your conviction. We examine the trial record to identify whether the prosecution presented adequate evidence to support the verdict.
If the judge provided legally incorrect jury instructions or allowed an improper verdict form, the conviction may be reversed on appeal. We identify instructional errors that prejudiced your case and present arguments for reversal.
Appellate courts can review sentences that exceed legal limits or violate sentencing guidelines. We challenge sentences that are disproportionate or imposed in violation of applicable law.
The Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd has successfully handled criminal appeals for clients throughout Wapato, Yakima County, and across Washington State. We bring detailed knowledge of appellate procedure, substantive criminal law, and the specific preferences of local and state appellate courts. Our attorneys invest significant time in thoroughly analyzing your case, identifying viable legal issues, and developing persuasive arguments. We maintain a client-centered approach, keeping you informed throughout the appellate process and explaining your options clearly.
We understand that appeals represent a critical opportunity to challenge convictions and sentences that have devastated your life. Our commitment to thorough legal research, meticulous brief writing, and skilled oral advocacy has produced positive results for numerous clients. When you work with us, you gain attorneys who are genuinely invested in your case and dedicated to pursuing every available avenue for relief. We handle the complex legal work so you can focus on your future.
Criminal appeals can take anywhere from six months to several years depending on court caseload, the complexity of legal issues, and whether oral arguments are required. Direct appeals to the appellate division typically take one to two years from filing the notice of appeal through the court’s decision. Federal appeals and cases involving multiple legal issues may take longer. The timeline also depends on whether you file additional motions or pursue collateral relief after an initial appeal. Our firm works efficiently to prepare and file your brief within required timeframes while ensuring thorough legal analysis. We keep you informed about expected timelines and any delays that may occur. While waiting for an appellate decision can be stressful, the appellate process requires careful attention to detail and cannot be rushed without compromising the quality of your representation.
A direct appeal challenges your conviction or sentence by reviewing the trial record and arguing that legal errors occurred. Direct appeals must be filed within strict time limits and can only address issues that appear in the trial record. Collateral relief, such as post-conviction relief motions or habeas corpus petitions, challenges your conviction based on new facts or grounds that could not have been raised on direct appeal. Collateral relief options include claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and newly discovered evidence. Both avenues serve important purposes in the criminal justice system. Direct appeals focus on legal errors while collateral relief addresses other grounds for overturning convictions. We evaluate whether your case qualifies for direct appeal, collateral relief, or both. Understanding which remedies are available and strategically pursuing them significantly increases your chances of success.
Yes, you can appeal even after accepting a guilty plea, though the grounds for appeal are more limited than when challenging a conviction after trial. You can appeal a guilty plea conviction by arguing that your plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, or by raising issues that occurred after the plea such as sentencing errors. You cannot generally challenge the underlying facts if you entered a guilty plea. Ineffective assistance of counsel claims can be raised if your attorney’s performance was deficient in connection with the plea process. Many clients believe that a guilty plea forecloses all appeal options, but this is not accurate. We review guilty plea cases for appellable issues and pursue remedies when viable grounds exist. We may challenge sentencing decisions, procedural violations, or attorney performance even when a guilty plea has been entered.
Ineffective assistance of counsel is a legal claim that your trial or appellate attorney’s performance fell below the standard expected of a reasonably competent attorney and that this deficient performance prejudiced your case. Examples include failing to investigate important evidence, neglecting to raise valid legal objections, providing inadequate opening or closing statements, or failing to pursue favorable plea negotiations. The claim requires proving both that performance was deficient and that there is a reasonable probability of a different outcome had the attorney performed adequately. Ineffective counsel claims are complex and require detailed analysis of your attorney’s actions and the case circumstances. Courts recognize that trial strategy decisions receive deference and that hindsight criticism of strategy choices does not establish ineffectiveness. We carefully evaluate whether your attorney’s conduct meets the legal standard for ineffective assistance and whether pursuing this claim offers a reasonable chance of success.
After the appellate court issues a decision, you have limited options to seek further review. If the decision is unfavorable, you may seek discretionary review to the Washington Supreme Court or, in federal cases, to the United States Supreme Court. However, these courts accept very few cases for review, and the standards for getting your case heard are stringent. If your conviction is reversed on appeal, the prosecution may have the option to retry your case, and we help you prepare for that possibility. When an appeal is successful and your conviction is reversed, you may be entitled to a new trial, sentencing hearing, or case dismissal depending on the court’s ruling. We guide you through all post-decision proceedings and continue advocating for your interests. Our relationship with clients does not end when the appellate decision is issued.
Criminal appeal costs vary depending on case complexity, the number of legal issues involved, and whether oral arguments are required. We provide detailed fee estimates and discuss payment arrangements during your initial consultation. Our firm offers competitive pricing while maintaining the high quality of work that cases deserve. We can discuss flat-fee arrangements for certain appeals or hourly arrangements depending on what works best for your situation. Investing in skilled appellate representation is important because appeals represent critical opportunities to overturn convictions and reduce sentences. We discuss the financial aspects of your appeal openly so you can make informed decisions about representation.
Contact an appellate attorney immediately after conviction and sentencing to ensure critical deadlines are met and your rights are protected. You typically have 30 days from sentencing to file a notice of appeal. During this time, your attorney should discuss whether an appeal is feasible and what legal issues might support reversal. We recommend requesting the trial transcript and obtaining copies of all documents related to your case. Do not delay in seeking appellate representation. Missing procedural deadlines can permanently waive your right to appeal or limit the grounds you can raise. Acting quickly gives us time to thoroughly analyze your case and develop the strongest possible appellate strategy.
Yes, appellate courts can reduce sentences that exceed legal limits, violate sentencing guidelines, or are imposed arbitrarily. We argue for sentence reduction based on legal grounds such as guideline violations, disproportionate sentences, or failure to consider required sentencing factors. Appellate courts review sentences with varying standards of review depending on the type of sentence challenge involved. Sentencing appeals offer an important avenue for clients who received excessive sentences at trial. We carefully analyze your sentence against applicable law and develop arguments for reduction. Even when conviction reversal is unlikely, sentence reduction may be achievable.
Post-conviction relief is a legal mechanism available in Washington that allows defendants to challenge their conviction based on grounds that could not be raised on direct appeal. Post-conviction relief claims typically involve ineffective assistance of counsel, newly discovered evidence, or other factual claims that require evidentiary hearing. Unlike direct appeals, post-conviction relief proceedings can include presentation of new evidence and witness testimony. Post-conviction relief offers an important alternative when direct appeal grounds are limited. We evaluate whether your case qualifies for post-conviction relief and pursue this remedy aggressively when viable. Many clients have succeeded in overturning convictions through post-conviction relief claims.
Whether to pursue both direct appeal and post-conviction relief depends on the specific facts of your case and the legal grounds available. Direct appeals must be filed first and address issues apparent from the trial record. Post-conviction relief can be filed later and addresses issues that require new factual development. In many cases, pursuing both avenues maximizes your chances of obtaining relief. We evaluate your case thoroughly to determine the optimal appellate strategy. We may recommend direct appeal alone, post-conviction relief alone, or both depending on what your case circumstances suggest is most likely to succeed. Our goal is pursuing every viable avenue for overturning your conviction or reducing your sentence.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields