Navigating Post-Conviction Relief
Appeals Lawyer in Town and Country, Washington
Criminal Appeals and Post-Conviction Defense
If you have been convicted of a crime, an appeal may provide a pathway to challenge your conviction or sentence. The appeals process is complex and requires a thorough understanding of appellate procedure, legal precedent, and substantive criminal law. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we represent clients throughout the appellate process in Washington state courts and federal courts, examining trial records for legal errors and building compelling arguments to present before appellate judges.
Why Criminal Appeals Matter
An appeal offers the opportunity to correct legal errors that occurred during trial, whether those errors involved improper jury instructions, inadmissible evidence, ineffective assistance of counsel, or constitutional violations. Post-conviction relief can result in sentence reduction, case dismissal, or a new trial. Without competent appellate representation, critical legal issues may be waived or inadequately presented. Appellate work requires intensive legal research, persuasive writing, and oral advocacy skills to effectively challenge convictions and protect your future.
Greene and Lloyd's Appellate Law Experience
Understanding Criminal Appeals
The criminal appeals process begins after conviction and sentencing. You typically have a limited time window to file a notice of appeal, making immediate action critical. An appellate attorney will request and review the complete trial record, including transcripts, evidence exhibits, and court rulings. This detailed review identifies potential legal errors or constitutional issues that may form the basis for appeal. The process differs significantly from trial work, focusing on legal arguments rather than presentation of evidence.
Need More Information?
Key Appeals and Post-Conviction Terms
Notice of Appeal
A formal document filed with the court indicating your intention to appeal a conviction or sentence. This must typically be filed within a specific timeframe, usually thirty days after sentencing in Washington.
Appellate Brief
A detailed written argument submitted to the appellate court outlining the legal issues, errors claimed at trial, and the legal reasoning supporting reversal or modification of the conviction or sentence.
Trial Record
The complete documentation of the trial proceedings, including transcripts of testimony, evidence admitted, court rulings, and judicial decisions. Appellate attorneys rely heavily on the trial record to identify errors.
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
A claim that a defendant’s trial attorney failed to provide adequate representation, which affected the outcome of the case. This is a common basis for post-conviction relief and appeals.
PRO TIPS
Act Quickly on Appeal Deadlines
The window to file an appeal is narrow, typically thirty days from sentencing. Missing this deadline can result in permanent loss of appellate rights. Contact an appeals attorney immediately after conviction to ensure all procedural requirements are met and your case is properly preserved for appellate review.
Preserve Issues During Trial
Many appellate issues must be raised during trial to be preserved for appeal, such as objections to jury instructions or evidentiary rulings. If your trial attorney failed to preserve issues, a post-conviction claim of ineffective assistance may be available. Early involvement of an appeals attorney helps ensure all critical issues are properly preserved.
Consider All Available Remedies
Beyond direct appeal, post-conviction options include petitions for review, post-conviction relief motions, and habeas corpus actions. Each remedy has different requirements and timeframes. Our attorneys evaluate all available options to pursue the strongest path forward for your case.
When to Pursue Appeals Versus Other Options
When Full Appellate Representation Is Necessary:
Preservation of Constitutional Rights
Constitutional violations at trial, such as denial of the right to counsel, improper searches, or deprivation of due process, require immediate appellate attention. These claims can only be raised through proper appeal channels and demand thorough legal analysis. Comprehensive appellate representation ensures all constitutional issues are identified and properly presented to the court.
Trial Errors Affecting Verdict
When trial judges make significant errors in jury instructions, evidentiary rulings, or procedural matters that likely affected the verdict, a comprehensive appeal is warranted. These errors require detailed legal research and persuasive written arguments backed by case law. Full appellate representation provides the best opportunity to overturn a conviction based on such errors.
When Limited Post-Conviction Remedies May Apply:
Sentencing Appeals Only
If your conviction is solid but the sentence appears excessive or improper under sentencing laws, a focused sentencing appeal may be appropriate. This limited approach targets specific sentencing issues without attacking the underlying conviction. Such appeals often succeed when sentences fall outside statutory ranges or fail to follow applicable guidelines.
Administrative or Procedural Corrections
Sometimes court records contain clerical errors or procedural irregularities that can be corrected through motions rather than full appeal. These limited remedies work well when the substantive conviction and sentence are not challenged. However, distinguishing between correctable errors and appellable issues requires careful legal analysis.
Common Situations Requiring Appeals Representation
Why Choose Greene and Lloyd for Your Appeal
Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd brings dedicated appellate experience to clients facing criminal convictions in Washington. Our attorneys understand appellate procedure, have developed relationships with appellate courts, and possess the legal research and writing skills essential for successful appeals. We treat each case individually, conducting thorough record reviews and developing tailored strategies for your specific circumstances.
We recognize that time is critical in appellate work and act promptly to protect your rights. Our team combines attention to detail with persuasive advocacy to present the strongest possible case before appellate judges. We are committed to pursuing every available remedy and explaining each step of the appellate process to you clearly.
Contact Us for Your Appeal Review
People Also Search For
Post-Conviction Relief Washington
Criminal Appeals Attorney
Appellate Defense Lawyer
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
Washington State Appeals
Sentence Modification Appeal
Post-Conviction Petition
Habeas Corpus Washington
Related Services
FAQS
How long do I have to file an appeal in Washington?
In Washington, you typically have thirty days from the date of sentencing to file a notice of appeal. This is a strict deadline, and missing it can result in permanent loss of appellate rights. However, there are limited circumstances where extensions or late appeals may be possible if you can show good cause for the delay. It is critical to contact an appeals attorney immediately after conviction to ensure this deadline is met. Once the notice of appeal is filed, the appellate process itself may take months or even years to complete. The timeline depends on court caseload, the complexity of your case, and whether oral arguments are requested. Despite the longer overall timeline, the initial thirty-day filing deadline is non-negotiable and should be your immediate priority.
What is the difference between direct appeal and post-conviction relief?
A direct appeal challenges your conviction or sentence based on errors that appear in the trial record. This process reviews what happened during your trial, including jury instructions, evidentiary rulings, and procedural errors. Direct appeals focus on legal issues and do not involve presentation of new evidence. If the appellate court finds reversible error, it can overturn your conviction or modify your sentence. Post-conviction relief, by contrast, addresses issues that are not evident from the trial record alone, such as newly discovered evidence or ineffective assistance of counsel. Post-conviction petitions and motions allow you to present new information and arguments that could not have been raised during direct appeal. Both remedies are important, and determining which is appropriate for your case requires careful legal analysis.
Can I appeal if I pled guilty?
Yes, you can appeal even after entering a guilty plea, but the scope of appealable issues is more limited. When you plead guilty, you typically waive the right to challenge the underlying evidence or your guilt. However, you can still appeal issues such as ineffective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations, constitutional violations during the plea process, or sentencing errors. Appeals following guilty pleas often focus on whether your attorney adequately explained the consequences of your plea, whether you understood your rights, or whether the plea was knowing and voluntary. If your trial attorney provided inadequate representation during plea negotiations or failed to advise you of important rights, these issues may support an appeal or post-conviction petition.
What is ineffective assistance of counsel?
Ineffective assistance of counsel occurs when your trial attorney failed to provide adequate legal representation, and this failure affected the outcome of your case. To succeed on this claim, you must show that your attorney’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that but for this deficiency, the result of the case would likely have been different. This includes failures to object to errors, failure to present available evidence, inadequate legal research, or failure to advise you properly. Ineffective assistance claims can be raised on direct appeal or through post-conviction petitions. These claims are among the most common grounds for overturning convictions or obtaining new trials. If you believe your trial attorney was inadequate, an appeals attorney can evaluate whether you have a viable ineffective assistance claim and pursue the appropriate legal remedy.
Will I get a new trial if my appeal is successful?
A successful appeal can result in different outcomes depending on the nature of the error. If the appellate court finds that a trial error was harmless or had minimal impact, it may affirm your conviction despite the error. However, if an error is deemed reversible and likely affected the verdict, the court may order a new trial, reverse the conviction entirely, or remand for resentencing. The specific remedy depends on the type of error and its severity. Some errors automatically require a new trial, while others may allow resentencing only. In some cases, appellate courts reverse and remand to the trial court for specific findings or reconsideration. An appeals attorney will explain the likely outcomes in your case based on the specific issues being appealed.
Can I appeal a sentence I believe is too harsh?
Yes, sentences can be appealed on several grounds, including claims that they are excessive or unconstitutional. Washington law allows appeals based on sentencing errors, failure to follow statutory requirements, or sentences that fall outside authorized ranges. However, appellate courts give trial judges significant discretion in sentencing, so appeals must identify specific legal errors rather than merely arguing that the sentence is too severe. Successful sentencing appeals often involve claims that the trial court failed to consider mitigating circumstances, imposed consecutive sentences contrary to law, or imposed a sentence exceeding statutory guidelines. Post-conviction relief can also address sentencing issues discovered after trial. If you believe your sentence was unlawful or procedurally improper, an appeals attorney can evaluate your options.
How much does an appeal cost?
Appeal costs vary significantly based on case complexity, the number of issues involved, and the amount of legal research required. Direct appeals generally involve reviewing trial records, legal research, brief writing, and potentially oral arguments. Post-conviction petitions may involve additional investigation, witness interviews, and evidentiary hearings. Cost estimates can be provided after an initial case evaluation. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eligible for a public defender on appeal in criminal cases. Regardless of your financial situation, it is important to consult with an appeals attorney promptly to understand your options, your likely costs, and the potential value of your appeal. We offer payment plans and work with clients on their budgetary constraints.
What happens during oral arguments on appeal?
Oral arguments occur when appellate judges want to hear directly from both the defendant’s attorney and the prosecution. During oral arguments, each side presents their legal position to a panel of judges who ask questions to clarify the arguments or test the strength of your positions. Oral arguments provide an opportunity to emphasize key issues and respond to the court’s concerns directly. Not all appeals include oral arguments; many are decided based on the written briefs alone. When oral arguments are granted, they typically last fifteen to thirty minutes per side. Preparation is extensive, involving detailed knowledge of your case, applicable law, and potential questions judges might raise. Our attorneys prepare thoroughly for oral arguments to present your case persuasively.
What is a petition for review in Washington?
A petition for review is a request to the Washington Supreme Court to review a decision made by the Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court has discretionary jurisdiction, meaning it can choose which cases to hear. Petitions for review must raise issues of substantial public interest or constitute a significant new question of law that needs clarification by the highest court. Petitions for review are typically used to challenge important legal principles or to challenge decisions that conflict with other appellate decisions. While success rates are lower than with direct appeals to the Court of Appeals, review by the Washington Supreme Court can result in important legal precedent and provide a strong opportunity for relief when the right issues are presented.
Can I pursue both direct appeal and post-conviction relief?
Yes, direct appeal and post-conviction relief serve complementary purposes and can both be pursued. Direct appeals address legal errors evident from the trial record, while post-conviction petitions address issues like newly discovered evidence or ineffective assistance that may not be apparent from the record alone. Some issues can be raised on both platforms, while others are unique to post-conviction relief. Developing a comprehensive appellate strategy often involves pursuing both avenues when appropriate. However, timing is critical, as direct appeals must be filed within thirty days of sentencing, while some post-conviction remedies have different deadlines. An appeals attorney will evaluate your case and recommend the best coordinated approach to maximize your chances of success.