When a defective or dangerous product causes injury, you deserve compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. At Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd, we help Town and Country residents pursue product liability claims against manufacturers and distributors who placed unsafe products into the marketplace. Whether the defect existed in the design, manufacturing process, or product warnings, our team investigates thoroughly to build a strong case on your behalf. We understand the physical and financial toll injuries can take, and we work diligently to hold responsible parties accountable.
Product liability cases protect consumers and hold manufacturers accountable for unsafe products. When you pursue a claim, you not only recover compensation for your injuries but also send a message that safety matters. Companies must conduct proper testing, provide clear warnings, and design products that don’t pose unreasonable risks. By holding manufacturers responsible, we help prevent similar injuries from happening to others. Additionally, securing financial recovery allows you to focus on healing without worrying about medical bills, lost income, or ongoing care expenses. A successful product liability claim restores your financial stability and validates your suffering.
Product liability law holds manufacturers, distributors, and sellers responsible when their products cause injury due to defects or inadequate warnings. There are three main categories of product defects: design defects (where the product is unreasonably dangerous by design), manufacturing defects (where something goes wrong during production), and failure to warn (where manufacturers don’t provide adequate safety instructions or warnings). To succeed in a product liability claim, you must prove the product was defective, the defect caused your injury, and you suffered damages as a result. Washington law recognizes several legal theories under which manufacturers can be held liable, including strict liability and negligence.
A design defect occurs when a product is inherently unsafe due to its design, regardless of how carefully it was manufactured. Even if built exactly as intended, the product still poses an unreasonable danger to consumers. For example, a car design that makes it prone to rollover in normal driving conditions represents a design defect.
This defect exists when a manufacturer fails to provide adequate warnings or instructions about potential dangers associated with a product. Manufacturers have a duty to inform consumers about known risks and how to safely use their products. Missing or unclear warnings can make an otherwise safe product unreasonably dangerous.
A manufacturing defect occurs during the production process when something goes wrong, causing an individual product to differ from its intended design. This might include defective materials, assembly errors, or quality control failures. The product left the factory in a condition different from what the manufacturer intended.
Strict liability holds manufacturers responsible for defective products regardless of whether they were negligent or exercised reasonable care. This legal standard focuses on whether the product was defective and caused injury, not on the manufacturer’s intentions or conduct.
From the moment you’re injured, keep detailed records of the product, how you used it, and all medical treatment. Photograph the defective product from multiple angles and preserve it in its damaged state. Document all expenses, medical visits, and how the injury has affected your daily life and work.
If others saw how your injury occurred or heard about previous similar incidents, obtain their contact information while memories are fresh. Witness testimony can significantly strengthen your claim and establish a pattern of problems with the product. Contact details gathered early are invaluable when your case is being investigated months later.
Do not contact the manufacturer, distributor, or their insurance representatives without legal counsel present. Anything you say can be used against you, and companies often record such communications. Let your attorney handle all communications to protect your legal rights and ensure nothing undermines your claim.
Product liability cases involving multiple defendants, complex manufacturing processes, or scientific evidence require thorough investigation and expert testimony. Comprehensive legal representation ensures all responsible parties are identified and held accountable. Your attorney will coordinate with product safety specialists to prove the defect and its causal connection to your injury.
When injuries result in substantial medical expenses, permanent disability, or lost earning capacity, full legal representation becomes essential for maximizing recovery. Insurance adjusters will aggressively minimize payouts for serious claims, requiring skilled negotiation and litigation readiness. Comprehensive representation ensures you receive fair compensation for all current and future damages.
Some cases involve obvious product defects and minor injuries where liability is clear and damages are straightforward to calculate. In these situations, a simpler approach might suffice if the responsible party readily accepts fault. However, even minor cases benefit from legal guidance to ensure fair settlement values.
Occasionally, a manufacturer or distributor promptly acknowledges the defect and cooperates in resolving the claim fairly. When all parties recognize their responsibility and act in good faith, less intensive representation might be needed. Nevertheless, having counsel review any settlement offer protects your interests before accepting.
Smartphones, laptops, and other electronics may have battery defects, overheating issues, or fire hazards that injure users. Our firm pursues claims against manufacturers for injuries caused by these product defects.
Prescription medications and over-the-counter drugs may cause serious side effects that manufacturers failed to adequately warn about. We help injured patients hold pharmaceutical companies responsible for inadequate warnings and defective medications.
Automotive defects involving brakes, accelerators, airbags, and structural integrity cause serious injuries and fatalities. We represent families harmed by these vehicle defects in claims against manufacturers and distributors.
Law Offices of Greene and Lloyd brings extensive experience pursuing product liability claims for injured Town and Country residents. We understand how manufacturers operate, what evidence proves defects, and how to negotiate with their insurance representatives. Our team thoroughly investigates each case, consulting with product safety professionals and engineers to build compelling evidence. We’re not intimidated by large corporations or their legal teams—we stand firm in demanding fair compensation. Your success is measured by the recovery we achieve and your satisfaction with our representation throughout the process.
We work on contingency, meaning you pay no upfront fees and we only get paid if you recover compensation. This aligns our interests with yours and allows anyone injured by a defective product to pursue justice regardless of financial resources. Our attorneys are accessible, responsive, and committed to keeping you informed at every stage. We handle negotiations, discovery, and litigation so you can focus on recovery. Contact us today for a free consultation to discuss your product liability claim and learn how we can help.
Nearly any consumer product can be the subject of a product liability claim if it’s defective and causes injury. This includes automobiles, appliances, electronics, machinery, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toys, furniture, and countless other items. Defects can occur at any stage—design, manufacturing, or in the warnings provided. Our firm has handled claims involving products across virtually every industry, from household items to industrial equipment. We understand the unique challenges each type of product presents and how to prove the defect caused your injury. The key is demonstrating that the product was unreasonably dangerous due to a defect. Whether the manufacturer failed to test the product adequately, used substandard materials, or neglected to warn consumers about known risks, we investigate thoroughly to establish liability. If you’ve been injured by a product and suspect a defect was responsible, contact us to discuss your situation.
Washington has strict time limits called statutes of limitations that restrict when you can file a lawsuit. Generally, you have three years from the date of your injury to file a product liability claim. However, there are exceptions and nuances to this rule depending on your specific circumstances. Some claims may have different deadlines, and certain situations can extend or shorten the time limit. Delaying action may jeopardize your right to pursue compensation, so it’s important to consult with an attorney promptly after your injury. We recommend contacting us as soon as possible after being injured by a defective product. Early involvement allows us to preserve evidence, gather witness statements while memories are fresh, and ensure all legal deadlines are met. Even if some time has passed since your injury, we can evaluate your specific situation and advise whether your claim is still viable. Don’t assume your case is too old—let us assess your rights during a free consultation.
Product liability claims can result in compensation for multiple categories of damages. Medical expenses—both past treatment and future care—are recoverable, including hospital bills, surgeries, therapy, and ongoing medical needs. Lost wages from time missed work due to your injury are compensable, along with reduced earning capacity if your injury affects your ability to work in the future. You can also recover for pain and suffering, emotional distress, and diminished quality of life. In cases of particularly egregious conduct, punitive damages may be available to punish the manufacturer and deter similar behavior. The total value of your claim depends on factors like the severity of your injury, your medical expenses, your income level, and the duration of recovery. Insurance companies often undervalue claims, which is why having experienced legal representation matters. We thoroughly document all damages and present compelling evidence of their value. Our goal is to ensure you receive full and fair compensation for everything you’ve suffered, not just the obvious expenses but also the less quantifiable impacts on your life.
One of the significant advantages in product liability law is that you often don’t need to prove negligence. Washington recognizes the doctrine of strict liability, which holds manufacturers responsible for defective products regardless of how careful they were. This means even if the company exercised reasonable care in manufacturing, testing, and distribution, they can still be liable if the product is defective and unreasonably dangerous. You must prove the product had a defect, the defect existed when it left the manufacturer, and the defect caused your injury—but you don’t have to show negligence or carelessness. Strict liability protects consumers because it encourages manufacturers to prioritize safety and thoroughly test products before release. Companies cannot hide behind claims that they did their best; the standard is whether the product was safe enough for consumers. However, proving what constitutes a defect requires detailed investigation and often expert testimony. Our team knows how to build this evidence and present it persuasively to insurance adjusters and juries.
A design defect exists when the product’s basic design is inherently unsafe, even if manufactured perfectly according to specifications. For example, if a vehicle’s design makes it prone to rolling over in normal driving conditions, that’s a design defect affecting all models of that vehicle. The defect is systemic to how the product was conceived and engineered. A manufacturing defect, by contrast, occurs when something goes wrong during production, causing an individual unit to differ from the intended design. This might include using wrong materials, assembly errors, or quality control failures that allow one particular product to be dangerous while identical versions function safely. Differentiating between these defects matters for your claim because the evidence and strategy vary. Design defect cases often require showing that alternative, safer designs existed and were feasible. Manufacturing defect cases focus on proving what went wrong in production and that the defect directly caused your injury. Some products may have both types of defects. Our investigation determines which defects apply to your situation and develops the strongest possible case.
Following instructions doesn’t guarantee immunity for manufacturers from product liability claims. If a product has a design defect, it may be dangerous even when used correctly. Additionally, if warnings or instructions are unclear, inadequate, or missing, a manufacturer cannot blame consumers for not following instructions they couldn’t understand. The law recognizes that manufacturers have a duty to make products reasonably safe and to provide clear warnings about known dangers. Juries understand that consumers sometimes use products in ways not explicitly warned against, especially if the danger wasn’t obvious. You don’t need to have used a product perfectly to have a valid claim. What matters is whether the product was defective and whether you used it in a reasonably foreseeable way. Manufacturers must anticipate how consumers typically use their products and design accordingly. If you were injured by a defective product, even if you deviated slightly from instructions, you may still have a valid claim. We evaluate your specific actions in the context of the product’s defect and what warnings were provided.
Product liability cases vary significantly in duration depending on complexity, the number of defendants, and whether the case settles or goes to trial. Some straightforward cases with clear liability may resolve through settlement within six months to a year. More complex cases involving multiple defendants, extensive discovery, and expert testimony can take two to five years or longer. Litigation requires investigation, gathering documents, depositions, expert reports, and trial preparation—all of which take time. Insurance companies often prefer to delay in hopes you’ll become desperate and accept lower settlements, but our firm doesn’t allow that pressure to influence our strategy. We pursue cases aggressively while remaining patient enough to build the strongest possible presentation. Settlement discussions often occur during litigation after both sides have invested in developing their cases. Some matters conclude faster than others, and we keep you informed about realistic timelines based on your specific situation. If your case goes to trial, you can expect the timeline to extend further, but we’re prepared to take your case all the way to jury verdict if necessary to achieve fair compensation.
A product recall after your injury actually strengthens your claim significantly. It proves the manufacturer recognized the danger and that the defect was real and serious enough to warrant action. Recalls demonstrate that the company knew about the problem but didn’t adequately warn early consumers like you. Even if the recall happened months or years after your injury, it supports your assertion that the product was defective. Internal communications about the defect prior to the recall become important evidence of what the manufacturer knew and when they knew it. Your injury may have been among the incidents that prompted the recall investigation. We investigate whether any recalls occurred for your product and what the recall notice states. This evidence often accelerates settlement discussions because insurers recognize the strength of your position. We also examine whether the company delayed the recall unnecessarily, kept the recall quiet, or failed to notify consumers who had already purchased the product. Sometimes companies modify the product rather than issue a recall, which still indicates acknowledgment of a defect. Let us investigate your product’s recall history and history of injury complaints.
While you technically have the right to pursue a claim independently, product liability cases are complex and require significant knowledge of law, evidence rules, and investigation techniques. Insurance companies expect to negotiate with attorneys and often take self-represented claimants less seriously. They’ll employ their own sophisticated legal teams to minimize your recovery, and attempting to navigate this alone typically results in substantially lower compensation. An attorney levels the playing field, handles negotiations professionally, and ensures deadlines are met and proper procedures followed. Most importantly, we work on contingency so you pay nothing upfront. Our involvement from the beginning protects your rights and maximizes your recovery. We investigate the product, identify all responsible parties, consult with experts, gather evidence, and negotiate aggressively. Attempting to handle this yourself leaves you vulnerable to insurance company tactics and settlement offers below your claim’s true value. Early attorney involvement allows us to preserve evidence and build your case properly. Contact us today for a free consultation—there’s no downside to learning your options.
The legal doctrine of “assumption of risk” has limited application in product liability cases. Even if you knew about a danger, you didn’t necessarily assume the risk if the product had a defect beyond what a reasonable consumer would expect. Manufacturers cannot escape liability simply by claiming consumers should have anticipated every possible defect. Additionally, many product dangers are not obvious or knowable without being an engineer. For example, you wouldn’t know whether a vehicle’s braking system has a design defect or whether a medication has a hidden side effect just from looking at the product. Defense claims of assumption of risk rarely succeed in defective product cases, particularly when the defect is not obvious or when warnings were inadequate. The law protects consumers from dangers they cannot reasonably detect or appreciate. Even if you acknowledged some level of risk in using a product, that doesn’t excuse a manufacturer from liability for hidden defects or failures to warn about known dangers. We anticipate these defense arguments and prepare evidence to counter them effectively.
Personal injury and criminal defense representation
"*" indicates required fields